Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e193466. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3466.
Although the prevalence of untreated dental caries among Indigenous Australian children greatly exceeds the prevalence observed among non-Indigenous children, the associations of dental caries with risk factors is considered to be the same.
To estimate the association of modifiable risk factors with area-based inequalities in untreated dental caries among Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian children using decomposition analysis.
DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional study using data from Australia's National Child Oral Health Study 2012-2014, a nationally representative sample of both Indigenous and non-Indigenous children aged 5 to 14 years. Data analyses were completed in November 2018.
Outcomes were the mean number of decayed tooth surfaces in the primary dentition for children aged 5 to 10 years and mean number of decayed tooth surfaces in the permanent dentition for children aged 8 to 14 years. The area-based measure was the school-based Index of Community Socio-Educational Advantage, with individual-level variables including sex, equivalized household income, tooth-brushing frequency, sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption, time from last dental visit, and residing in an area with water fluoridation.
There were 720 Indigenous children aged 5 to 10 years, 14 769 non-Indigenous children aged 5 to 10 years, 738 Indigenous children aged 8 to 14 years, and 15 631 non-Indigenous children aged 8 to 14 years. For area-based inequalities in primary dentition among Indigenous children, two-thirds of the contribution was associated with SSB consumption (65.9%; 95% CI, 65.5%-66.3%), followed by irregular tooth brushing (15.0%; 95% CI, 14.6%-15.5%) and low household income (14.5%; 95% CI, 14.1%-14.8%). Among non-Indigenous children, almost half the contribution was associated with low household income (47.6%; 95% CI, 47.6%-47.7%), followed by SSB consumption (31.0%; 95% CI, 30.9%-31.0%) and residing in an area with nonfluoridated water (9.5%; 95% CI, 9.5%-9.6%). For area-based inequalities in permanent dentition among Indigenous children, 40.0% (95% CI, 39.9%-40.1%) of the contribution was associated with residing in an area with nonfluoridated water, followed by low household income (20.0%; 95% CI, 19.7%-20.0%) and consumption of SSBs (20.0%; 95% CI, 19.9%-20.1%). Among non-Indigenous children, the contribution associated with low household income, SSB consumption, and last dental visit more than a year ago were each 28.6%.
The association of modifiable risk factors with area-based inequalities in untreated dental caries among Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian children differed substantially. Targets to reduce SSB consumption may reduce oral health inequalities for both groups; however, Indigenous children require additional focus on oral hygiene.
尽管澳大利亚原住民儿童未治疗的龋齿患病率大大超过非原住民儿童,但龋齿与风险因素的关联被认为是相同的。
使用分解分析估计可改变的风险因素与澳大利亚土著和非土著儿童未治疗龋齿的基于区域的不平等之间的关联。
设计、设置、参与者:使用澳大利亚国家儿童口腔健康研究 2012-2014 年的数据进行的横断面研究,该研究是对 5 至 14 岁的土著和非土著儿童进行的全国代表性样本。数据分析于 2018 年 11 月完成。
结果是 5 至 10 岁儿童乳牙的平均龋齿数和 8 至 14 岁儿童恒牙的平均龋齿数。基于区域的衡量标准是基于学校的社区社会教育优势指数,个体水平变量包括性别、均等家庭收入、刷牙频率、含糖饮料(SSB)消费、上次看牙医的时间以及居住在氟化水区域。
有 720 名 5 至 10 岁的土著儿童、14769 名 5 至 10 岁的非土著儿童、738 名 8 至 14 岁的土著儿童和 15631 名 8 至 14 岁的非土著儿童。对于土著儿童的乳牙基于区域的不平等,三分之二的贡献与 SSB 消费有关(65.9%;95%CI,65.5%-66.3%),其次是不规则刷牙(15.0%;95%CI,14.6%-15.5%)和低家庭收入(14.5%;95%CI,14.1%-14.8%)。对于非土著儿童,近一半的贡献与低家庭收入有关(47.6%;95%CI,47.6%-47.7%),其次是 SSB 消费(31.0%;95%CI,30.9%-31.0%)和居住在非氟化水区(9.5%;95%CI,9.5%-9.6%)。对于土著儿童恒牙基于区域的不平等,40.0%(95%CI,39.9%-40.1%)的贡献与居住在非氟化水区有关,其次是低家庭收入(20.0%;95%CI,19.7%-20.0%)和 SSB 消费(20.0%;95%CI,19.9%-20.1%)。对于非土著儿童,与低家庭收入、SSB 消费和一年多前最后一次看牙医有关的贡献均为 28.6%。
可改变的风险因素与澳大利亚土著和非土著儿童未治疗龋齿的基于区域的不平等之间的关联差异很大。减少 SSB 消费的目标可能会减少两个群体的口腔健康不平等;然而,土著儿童需要更加注重口腔卫生。