Suppr超能文献

系统联合去污剂和核酸酶法脱细胞神经移植物的比较:体外特征分析和体内评价。

Comparison of systematically combined detergent and nuclease-based decellularization methods for acellular nerve graft: An ex vivo characterization and in vivo evaluation.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2019 Jul;13(7):1241-1252. doi: 10.1002/term.2874. Epub 2019 Jun 14.

Abstract

Little consensus exists regarding which decellularization technique best removes the cellular components while maintaining structural integrity. We aimed to identify the most efficient and safest decellularization method by combining previously established chemical (detergent based) and biological (nuclease based) methods in a systematic manner. Sixty sciatic nerves were harvested from Sprague-Dawley rats and prepared in 120 nerve fragments with 1-cm length. Nerve fragments were randomly divided into six groups and decellularized with six different methods: A, nonionic detergent + amphoteric detergent; B, nonionic detergent + anionic detergent; C, anionic detergent + amphoteric detergent; D, nonionic detergent + nuclease; E, amphoteric detergent + nuclease; and F, anionic detergent + nuclease. The remaining cellular components were evaluated with H&E, DAPI, and S-100 immunohistochemical staining, and DNA content was measured in each sample. The remaining extracellular matrix (ECM) integrity was evaluated with H&E, Masson's trichrome, periodic acid-Schiff, Luxol fast blue, and laminin immunohistochemical staining, and collagen content was measured in each sample. The amphoteric detergent + nuclease method was the best protocol for both cell removal and ECM preservation. In the in vivo study, the nerve allograft that was decellularized with amphoteric detergent + nuclease showed an inferior recovery rate based on the tibialis anterior muscle weight to autograft, but considerable recovery was observed. In conclusion, among the possible systematic combinations of detergent- and nuclease-based methods, the combination of amphoteric detergent and nuclease is currently the most suitable for nerve decellularization in terms of adequate cell removal and sufficient preservation of the ECM.

摘要

对于哪种去细胞化技术能在保持结构完整性的同时更好地去除细胞成分,目前尚未达成共识。我们旨在通过系统地结合先前建立的化学(基于去污剂)和生物学(基于核酸酶)方法,确定最有效和最安全的去细胞化方法。我们从 Sprague-Dawley 大鼠中采集了 60 根坐骨神经,并制备了 120 个 1cm 长的神经段。神经段随机分为六组,采用六种不同的方法进行去细胞化:A 组,非离子型去污剂+两性离子型去污剂;B 组,非离子型去污剂+阴离子型去污剂;C 组,阴离子型去污剂+两性离子型去污剂;D 组,非离子型去污剂+核酸酶;E 组,两性离子型去污剂+核酸酶;F 组,阴离子型去污剂+核酸酶。用 H&E、DAPI 和 S-100 免疫组织化学染色评估剩余的细胞成分,测量每个样本的 DNA 含量。用 H&E、Masson 三色染色、过碘酸雪夫染色、卢索快速蓝染色和层粘连蛋白免疫组织化学染色评估剩余细胞外基质(ECM)的完整性,测量每个样本的胶原含量。两性离子型去污剂+核酸酶法在去除细胞和保留 ECM 方面效果最佳。在体内研究中,用两性离子型去污剂+核酸酶去细胞化的同种异体神经移植物的前胫骨肌肉重量恢复率低于自体移植物,但观察到了相当程度的恢复。总之,在所研究的基于去污剂和核酸酶的方法的可能系统组合中,两性离子型去污剂和核酸酶的组合在充分去除细胞和充分保留 ECM 方面是目前最适合神经去细胞化的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验