Suppr超能文献

[脊髓狭窄的微创减压技术]

[Minimally invasive decompression techniques for spinal cord stenosis].

作者信息

Korge A, Mehren C, Ruetten S

机构信息

Wirbelsäulenzentrum, Schön Klinik München Harlaching, Harlachinger Str. 51, 81547, München, Deutschland.

Lehrkrankenhaus und Institut für Wirbelsäulenforschung der Paracelsus Universität Salzburg, PMU, Salzburg, Österreich.

出版信息

Orthopade. 2019 Oct;48(10):824-830. doi: 10.1007/s00132-019-03732-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lumbar spinal canal stenosis is frequently found among elderly patients and significantly limits their quality of life. Non-surgical therapy is an initial treatment option; however, it does not eliminate the underlying pathology. Surgical decompression of the spinal canal has now become the treatment of choice.

OBJECTIVE

Minimalization of surgical approach strategies with maintaining sufficient decompression of the spinal canal and avoiding disadvantages of macrosurgical techniques, monolateral paravertebral approach with bilateral intraspinal decompression, specific surgical techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Minimally invasive decompression techniques using a microscope or an endoscope are presented and different surgical strategies depending on both the extent (mono-, bi-, and multisegmental) and the location of the stenosis (intraspinal central, lateral recess, foraminal) are described.

RESULTS

Minimally invasive microscopic or endoscopic decompression procedures enable sufficient widening of the spinal canal. Disadvantages of macrosurgical procedures (e. g., postoperative instability) can be avoided. The complication spectrum overlaps partially with that of macrosurgical interventions, albeit with significantly less marked severity. Subjective patient outcome is clearly improved.

CONCLUSIONS

Referring to modern minimally invasive decompression procedures, surgery of lumbar spinal canal stenosis represents a rational and logical treatment alternative, since causal treatment of the pathology is only possible with surgery.

摘要

背景

腰椎管狭窄症在老年患者中很常见,严重限制了他们的生活质量。非手术治疗是初始治疗选择;然而,它并不能消除潜在的病理状况。椎管手术减压现已成为首选治疗方法。

目的

在维持椎管充分减压并避免大手术技术缺点的情况下,使手术入路策略最小化,采用单侧椎旁入路双侧椎管内减压及特定手术技术。

材料与方法

介绍了使用显微镜或内窥镜的微创减压技术,并描述了根据狭窄程度(单节段、双节段和多节段)和部位(椎管中央、侧隐窝、椎间孔)的不同手术策略。

结果

微创显微镜或内窥镜减压手术能使椎管充分扩大。可避免大手术的缺点(如术后不稳定)。并发症谱与大手术干预部分重叠,尽管严重程度明显较轻。患者主观预后明显改善。

结论

鉴于现代微创减压手术,腰椎管狭窄症的手术是一种合理且符合逻辑的治疗选择,因为只有通过手术才能对病理状况进行病因治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验