Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands; Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.
Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.
J Crit Care. 2019 Aug;52:258-264. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.02.029. Epub 2019 May 1.
To describe the characteristics and procedural outcomes of source control interventions among Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients with severe intra-abdominal-infection (IAI).
We identified consecutive patients with suspected IAI in whom a source control intervention had been performed in two tertiary ICUs in the Netherlands, and performed retrospective in-depth case reviews to evaluate procedure type, diagnostic yield, and adequacy of source control after 14 days.
A total of 785 procedures were observed among 353 patients, with initial interventions involving 266 (75%) surgical versus 87 (25%) percutaneous approaches. Surgical index procedures typically involved IAI of (presumed) gastrointestinal origin (72%), whereas percutaneous index procedures were mostly performed for infections of the biliary tract/pancreas (50%) or peritoneal cavity (33%). Overall, 178 (50%) patients required multiple interventions (median 3 (IQR 2-4)). In a subgroup of 236 patients having their first procedure upon ICU admission, effective source control was ultimately achieved for 159 (67%) subjects. Persistence of organ failure was associated with inadequacy of source control at day 14, whereas trends in inflammatory markers were non-predictive.
Approximately half of ICU patients with IAI require more than one intervention, yet successful source control is eventually achieved in a majority of cases.
描述重症腹腔内感染(IAI)患者中 ICU 患者的源头控制干预措施的特点和程序结果。
我们在荷兰的两家三级 ICU 中确定了连续疑似 IAI 的患者,并对其进行了回顾性深入病例复查,以评估 14 天后的程序类型、诊断效果和源头控制的充分性。
共观察到 353 名患者的 785 次操作,初始干预包括 266 次(75%)外科手术与 87 次(25%)经皮途径。外科手术的索引程序通常涉及(假定的)胃肠道来源的 IAI(72%),而经皮索引程序主要用于胆道/胰腺(50%)或腹膜腔(33%)感染。总体而言,178 名(50%)患者需要多次干预(中位数 3(IQR 2-4))。在 236 名在 ICU 入院时接受首次手术的患者亚组中,最终有 159 名(67%)患者实现了有效的源头控制。第 14 天的器官衰竭持续存在与源头控制不足有关,而炎症标志物的趋势没有预测性。
约一半的 IAI 重症患者需要不止一次干预,但大多数情况下最终都能实现有效的源头控制。