Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Germany.
Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Germany.
Neuroimage. 2019 Aug 15;197:344-353. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.04.072. Epub 2019 May 3.
Balancing stability and flexibility is required to facilitate successful task selection in situations with competing stimuli. Research suggests a set of counteracting control processes that maintains this balance. In the present study, we investigate how two neural correlates of task preparation in event-related potentials (ERPs), the mixing positivity and the switch positivity, can be linked to stability and flexibility in task selection. In a cued task switching paradigm, we analyzed deviations of these ERPs when task confusions occurred, that is, when participants erroneously executed the currently irrelevant task. We found a reduced mixing positivity to be a main source of task confusions in a task environment that required ongoing switches between competing tasks, whereas the switch positivity was uninvolved here. However, an overabundance of this latter component was a source of task confusions in a task environment that required the repetitive execution of the same task, although task switches were not required at all in this condition. These results not only highlight the distinct functional significance of the two preparatory ERPs and show that control processes can be maladaptive in certain contexts. They can also be utilized to locate the mixing positivity and the switch positivity on the stability-flexibility spectrum. Our results are in line with accounts that suggest that a balance between stability and flexibility is facilitated by the concurrent involvement of two control processes. One that manages the top-down bias of the relevant task set and one that increases or decreases competition between alternatively available stimuli.
在存在竞争刺激的情况下,需要平衡稳定性和灵活性,以促进任务的成功选择。研究表明,有一组相互抵消的控制过程可以维持这种平衡。在本研究中,我们调查了事件相关电位 (ERP) 中两种与任务准备相关的神经相关物,即混合正性和转换正性,如何与任务选择的稳定性和灵活性相关联。在提示任务转换范式中,我们分析了当任务混淆发生时这些 ERP 的偏差,即当参与者错误地执行当前不相关的任务时。我们发现,在需要持续在竞争任务之间进行转换的任务环境中,混合正性的减少是任务混淆的主要原因,而转换正性在此处没有参与。然而,在需要重复执行相同任务的任务环境中,这种后一种成分的过多是任务混淆的原因,尽管在这种情况下根本不需要进行任务转换。这些结果不仅突出了两种预备性 ERP 的独特功能意义,并表明控制过程在某些情况下可能是适应性不良的。它们还可以用于在稳定性-灵活性谱上定位混合正性和转换正性。我们的结果与那些认为稳定性和灵活性之间的平衡是通过两个控制过程的并发参与来促进的观点一致。一个是管理相关任务集的自上而下的偏向,另一个是增加或减少替代可用刺激之间的竞争。