• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期动作错误处理归因于一般性的意外,而后期处理则是针对具体错误。

Early Action Error Processing Is Due to Domain-General Surprise, Whereas Later Processing Is Error Specific.

机构信息

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242.

Cognitive Control Collaborative, University of Iowa, Iowa City Iowa, 52242.

出版信息

J Neurosci. 2023 Nov 8;43(45):7678-7689. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1334-23.2023. Epub 2023 Oct 13.

DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1334-23.2023
PMID:37833065
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10634573/
Abstract

The ability to adapt behavior after erroneous actions is one of the key aspects of cognitive control. Error commission typically causes people to slow down their subsequent actions [post-error slowing (PES)]. Recent work has challenged the notion that PES reflects adaptive, controlled processing and instead suggests that it is a side effect of the surprising nature of errors. Indeed, human neuroimaging suggests that the brain networks involved in processing errors overlap with those processing error-unrelated surprise, calling into question whether there is a specific system for error processing in the brain at all. In the current study, we used EEG decoding and a novel behavioral paradigm to test whether there are indeed unique, error-specific processes that contribute to PES beyond domain-general surprise. Across two experiments in male and female humans ( = 76), we found that both errors and error-unrelated surprise were followed by slower responses when response-stimulus intervals were short. Furthermore, the early neural processes following error-specific and domain-general surprise showed significant cross-decoding. However, at longer intervals, which provided additional processing time, only errors were still followed by post-trial slowing. Furthermore, this error-specific PES effect was reflected in sustained neural activity that could be decoded from that associated with domain-general surprise, with the strongest contributions found at lateral frontal, occipital, and sensorimotor scalp sites. These findings suggest that errors and surprise initially share common processes, but that after additional processing time, unique, genuinely error-specific processes take over and contribute to behavioral adaptation. Humans typically slow their actions after errors (PES). Some suggest that PES is a side effect of the unexpected, surprising nature of errors, challenging the notion of a genuine error processing system in the human brain. Here, we used multivariate EEG decoding to identify behavioral and neural processes uniquely related to error processing. Action slowing occurred following both action errors and error-unrelated surprise when time to prepare the next response was short. However, when there was more time to react, only errors were followed by slowing, further reflected in sustained neural activity. This suggests that errors and surprise initially share common processing, but that after additional time, error-specific, adaptive processes take over.

摘要

行为错误后适应行为的能力是认知控制的关键方面之一。错误通常会导致人们减慢后续动作的速度[事后错误减缓(PES)]。最近的工作挑战了 PES 反映适应性、受控处理的观点,而是表明它是错误的意外性质的副作用。事实上,人类神经影像学表明,处理错误所涉及的大脑网络与处理与错误无关的意外的大脑网络重叠,这使得人们质疑大脑中是否存在专门用于处理错误的系统。在当前的研究中,我们使用 EEG 解码和一种新的行为范式来测试 PES 是否确实存在独特的、特定于错误的过程,这些过程除了一般的惊喜之外,还对 PES 做出了贡献。在两个男性和女性人类的实验中(= 76),我们发现当反应-刺激间隔较短时,无论是错误还是与错误无关的惊喜都会导致反应较慢。此外,特定于错误和一般惊喜的早期神经过程显示出显著的交叉解码。然而,在较长的间隔内,即提供额外的处理时间,只有错误仍然会导致试验后减速。此外,这种特定于错误的 PES 效应反映在可以从与一般惊喜相关的活动中解码出来的持续神经活动中,在侧额、枕部和感觉运动头皮部位发现了最强的贡献。这些发现表明,错误和惊喜最初共享共同的过程,但在额外的处理时间后,独特的、真正特定于错误的过程会接管并有助于行为适应。人类通常在犯错后会减慢他们的行动(PES)。一些人认为 PES 是错误的意外、令人惊讶的性质的副作用,这挑战了人类大脑中存在真正的错误处理系统的观点。在这里,我们使用多元 EEG 解码来识别与错误处理唯一相关的行为和神经过程。当准备下一个反应的时间较短时,无论是动作错误还是与错误无关的惊喜都会导致动作减缓。然而,当有更多的时间做出反应时,只有错误会导致减速,这进一步反映在持续的神经活动中。这表明错误和惊喜最初共享共同的处理过程,但在额外的时间后,特定于错误的适应性过程会接管。

相似文献

1
Early Action Error Processing Is Due to Domain-General Surprise, Whereas Later Processing Is Error Specific.早期动作错误处理归因于一般性的意外,而后期处理则是针对具体错误。
J Neurosci. 2023 Nov 8;43(45):7678-7689. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1334-23.2023. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
2
Two Types of Motor Inhibition after Action Errors in Humans.人类动作错误后的两种运动抑制类型。
J Neurosci. 2022 Sep 21;42(38):7267-7275. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1191-22.2022.
3
Error-induced adaptability: Behavioral and neural dynamics of response-stimulus interval modulations on posterror slowing.错误诱发的适应性:反应-刺激间隔调制在后错误减速中的行为和神经动力学。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 May;150(5):851-863. doi: 10.1037/xge0000978. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
4
Perceptual Surprise Improves Action Stopping by Nonselectively Suppressing Motor Activity via a Neural Mechanism for Motor Inhibition.感知惊喜通过一种用于运动抑制的神经机制非选择性地抑制运动活动,从而提高动作停止能力。
J Neurosci. 2018 Feb 7;38(6):1482-1492. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3091-17.2017. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
5
Timing-dependent differential effects of unexpected events on error processing reveal the interactive dynamics of surprise and error processing.时间依赖的意外事件对错误处理的差异影响揭示了惊讶和错误处理的交互动态。
Psychophysiology. 2021 Dec;58(12):e13922. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13922. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
6
Lesions to the prefrontal performance-monitoring network disrupt neural processing and adaptive behaviors after both errors and novelty.前额叶执行监控网络损伤会干扰神经处理过程,导致个体在犯错和面对新异刺激后,适应性行为出现紊乱。
Cortex. 2014 Jan;50:45-54. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.09.002. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
7
Distinct Modulations in Sensorimotor Postmovement and Foreperiod β-Band Activities Related to Error Salience Processing and Sensorimotor Adaptation.与错误显著性处理和感觉运动适应相关的感觉运动后运动期和前周期β波段活动的不同调制。
J Neurosci. 2015 Sep 16;35(37):12753-65. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1090-15.2015.
8
Slowing after Observed Error Transfers across Tasks.观察到跨任务错误转移后的减速。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 2;11(3):e0149836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149836. eCollection 2016.
9
Decoding the task specificity of post-error adjustments: Features and determinants.解码错误后调整的任务特异性:特征与决定因素。
Neuroimage. 2024 Aug 15;297:120692. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120692. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
10
Decoding the Specificity of Post-Error Adjustments Using EEG-Based Multivariate Pattern Analysis.使用基于脑电图的多变量模式分析解码错误后调整的特异性
J Neurosci. 2022 Aug 31;42(35):6800-6809. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0590-22.2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring neural mechanisms underlying error-related impairments in active working memory suggests an adaptive shielding of contents during cognitive control.探索主动工作记忆中与错误相关的损伤背后的神经机制表明,在认知控制过程中对内容存在适应性屏蔽。
bioRxiv. 2025 Jul 23:2025.07.19.665355. doi: 10.1101/2025.07.19.665355.
2
Lexical inhibition after semantic violations recruits a domain-general inhibitory control mechanism.语义违反后的词汇抑制会激活一种通用领域的抑制控制机制。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Oct 21. doi: 10.1037/xge0001642.
3
Brain-behavior analysis of transcranial direct current stimulation effects on a complex surgical motor task.经颅直流电刺激对复杂外科手术运动任务影响的脑-行为分析
Front Neuroergon. 2024 Jan 9;4:1135729. doi: 10.3389/fnrgo.2023.1135729. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Two Types of Motor Inhibition after Action Errors in Humans.人类动作错误后的两种运动抑制类型。
J Neurosci. 2022 Sep 21;42(38):7267-7275. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1191-22.2022.
2
Post-error slowing in anxiety and obsessive-compulsive disorders.焦虑症和强迫症中的错误后减速。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2022 Jun;22(3):610-624. doi: 10.3758/s13415-021-00976-9. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
3
Post-error recruitment of frontal sensory cortical projections promotes attention in mice.错误后额叶感觉皮层投射的重新募集促进小鼠的注意力。
Neuron. 2021 Apr 7;109(7):1202-1213.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.02.001. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
4
Cognitive Control in Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive and Anxiety Disorders: Brain-Behavioral Targets for Early Intervention.儿童强迫症和焦虑症中的认知控制:早期干预的脑行为靶点。
Biol Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 1;89(7):697-706. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.11.012. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
5
The JASP guidelines for conducting and reporting a Bayesian analysis.JASP 进行和报告贝叶斯分析的指南。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Jun;28(3):813-826. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01798-5.
6
A M/EEG-fMRI Fusion Primer: Resolving Human Brain Responses in Space and Time.M/EEG-fMRI 融合入门:解析人类大脑在空间和时间上的反应。
Neuron. 2020 Sep 9;107(5):772-781. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.07.001. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
7
MVPA-Light: A Classification and Regression Toolbox for Multi-Dimensional Data.MVPA-Light:一个用于多维数据的分类与回归工具箱。
Front Neurosci. 2020 Jun 4;14:289. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00289. eCollection 2020.
8
Assessing and adjusting for publication bias in the relationship between anxiety and the error-related negativity.评估和调整焦虑与错误相关负波之间关系的发表偏倚。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2020 Sep;155:87-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.05.008. Epub 2020 May 30.
9
Optimizing assessments of post-error slowing: A neurobehavioral investigation of a flanker task.优化对错误后减速的评估:一项关于侧抑制任务的神经行为研究。
Psychophysiology. 2020 Feb;57(2):e13473. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13473. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
10
Repetitive TMS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex modulates the error positivity: An ERP study.经颅磁刺激重复刺激左背外侧前额叶皮层可调节错误正波:一项 ERP 研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Oct;133:107153. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107153. Epub 2019 Aug 6.