• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Response to Editor letter "Admission characteristics predictive of in-hospital death from hospital-acquired sepsis: A comparison to community-acquired sepsis".

作者信息

Guirgis Faheem W, Padro Teresa, Smotherman Carmen, Gautam Shiva, Gerdik Cynthia, Gray-Eurom Kelly

机构信息

University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Department of Emergency Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, United States.

University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Department of Neurosurgery, Jacksonville, FL, United States.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2020 Apr;56:319-320. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.04.024. Epub 2019 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.04.024
PMID:31056223
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6815677/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Response to Editor letter "Admission characteristics predictive of in-hospital death from hospital-acquired sepsis: A comparison to community-acquired sepsis".对编辑来信《预测医院获得性脓毒症院内死亡的入院特征：与社区获得性脓毒症的比较》的回复
J Crit Care. 2020 Apr;56:319-320. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.04.024. Epub 2019 Apr 27.
2
Letter to the editor: Admission characteristics predictive of in-hospital death from hospital-acquired sepsis: A comparison to community-acquired sepsis.致编辑的信：预测医院获得性脓毒症院内死亡的入院特征：与社区获得性脓毒症的比较。
J Crit Care. 2020 Apr;56:318. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.04.026. Epub 2019 May 11.
3
Letter to the editor: Bias estimation of predictors and internal validity of the study "Admission characteristics predictive of in-hospital death from hospital-acquired sepsis: A comparison to community-acquired sepsis".致编辑的信：“预测医院获得性脓毒症院内死亡的入院特征：与社区获得性脓毒症的比较”研究中预测因素的偏倚估计及研究的内部效度
J Crit Care. 2020 Apr;56:321. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.04.025. Epub 2019 May 3.
4
Response to the Letter: "Bias estimation of predictors and internal validity of the study 'Admission characteristics predictive of in-hospital death from hospital-acquired sepsis: A comparison to community-acquired sepsis'".对信件的回复：“预测因素的偏倚估计与‘入院特征对医院获得性脓毒症院内死亡的预测作用：与社区获得性脓毒症的比较’研究的内部效度”
J Crit Care. 2020 Apr;56:322. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.04.023. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
5
Admission characteristics predictive of in-hospital death from hospital-acquired sepsis: A comparison to community-acquired sepsis.医院获得性败血症住院死亡的入院特征预测：与社区获得性败血症的比较。
J Crit Care. 2019 Jun;51:145-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.02.023. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
6
Clinical and microbiological characteristics and outcomes of community-acquired sepsis among adults: a single center, 1-year retrospective observational cohort study from Hungary.成人社区获得性败血症的临床和微生物学特征及转归：来自匈牙利的一项为期 1 年的单中心回顾性观察队列研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Jul 26;19(1):584. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4219-5.
7
Intermediate-term and long-term mortality among acute medical patients hospitalized with community-acquired sepsis: a population-based study.社区获得性脓毒症住院急性内科患者的中期和长期死亡率：一项基于人群的研究。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2017 Dec;24(6):404-410. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000379.
8
Discharge diagnoses versus medical record review in the identification of community-acquired sepsis.出院诊断与病历审查在社区获得性脓毒症识别中的比较
Crit Care. 2015 Feb 16;19(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0771-6.
9
Community- versus nosocomial-acquired severe sepsis and septic shock in patients admitted to a tertiary intensive care in Saudi Arabia, etiology and outcome.在沙特阿拉伯一家三级重症监护病房住院的患者中，社区获得性与医院获得性严重脓毒症和感染性休克的病因和结局。
J Infect Public Health. 2015 Sep-Oct;8(5):418-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2014.12.003. Epub 2015 May 4.
10
[Epidemiology of infection and sepsis in intensive care unit patients].[重症监护病房患者感染与脓毒症的流行病学]
Bull Acad Natl Med. 2004;188(7):1115-25; discussion 1125-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Admission characteristics predictive of in-hospital death from hospital-acquired sepsis: A comparison to community-acquired sepsis.医院获得性败血症住院死亡的入院特征预测：与社区获得性败血症的比较。
J Crit Care. 2019 Jun;51:145-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.02.023. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
2
Effect of a Resuscitation Strategy Targeting Peripheral Perfusion Status vs Serum Lactate Levels on 28-Day Mortality Among Patients With Septic Shock: The ANDROMEDA-SHOCK Randomized Clinical Trial.以外周灌注状态为目标的复苏策略与血清乳酸水平对感染性休克患者 28 天死亡率的影响：ANDROMEDA-SHOCK 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Feb 19;321(7):654-664. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.0071.
3
Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).脓毒症临床标准评估：针对《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义》（Sepsis-3）。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):762-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288.
4
Community-, Healthcare-, and Hospital-Acquired Severe Sepsis Hospitalizations in the University HealthSystem Consortium.大学卫生系统联盟中社区获得性、医疗保健相关性和医院获得性严重脓毒症住院情况
Crit Care Med. 2015 Sep;43(9):1945-51. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001164.
5
A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock.一项基于方案的早期脓毒性休克护理的随机试验。
N Engl J Med. 2014 May 1;370(18):1683-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1401602. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
6
Explicitly targeting explicit sepsis: fair metrics for quality assessment*.明确针对明确的脓毒症：质量评估的合理指标*
Crit Care Med. 2014 Mar;42(3):729-31. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000070.