Suppr超能文献

出院诊断与病历审查在社区获得性脓毒症识别中的比较

Discharge diagnoses versus medical record review in the identification of community-acquired sepsis.

作者信息

Wang Henry E, Addis Dylan R, Donnelly John P, Shapiro Nathan I, Griffin Russell L, Safford Monika M, Baddley John W

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alabama School of Medicine, 619 19th Street South, OHB 251, Birmingham, AL, 35249, USA.

University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2015 Feb 16;19(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0771-6.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We evaluated the accuracy of hospital discharge diagnoses in the identification of community-acquired sepsis and severe sepsis.

METHODS

We reviewed 379 serious infection hospitalizations from 2003 to 2012 from the national population-based reasons for geographic and racial differences in stroke (REGARDS) cohort. Through manual review of medical records, we defined criterion-standard community-acquired sepsis events as the presence of a serious infection on hospital presentation with ≥2 systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria. We also defined criterion-standard community-acquired severe sepsis events as sepsis with >1 sequential organ failure assessment organ dysfunction. For the same hospitalizations, we identified sepsis and severe sepsis events indicated by Martin et al. and Angus et al. International Classifications of Diseases 9th edition discharge diagnoses. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the Martin and Angus criteria for detecting criterion-standard community-acquired sepsis and severe sepsis events.

RESULTS

Among the 379 hospitalizations, there were 156 community-acquired sepsis and 122 community-acquired severe sepsis events. Discharge diagnoses identified 55 Martin-sepsis and 89 Angus-severe sepsis events. The accuracy of Martin-sepsis criteria for detecting community-acquired sepsis were: sensitivity 27.6%; specificity 94.6%; positive predictive value (PPV) 78.2%; negative predictive value (NPV) 65.1%. The accuracy of the Angus-severe sepsis criteria for detecting community-acquired severe sepsis were: sensitivity 42.6%; specificity 86.0%; PPV 58.4%; NPV 75.9%. Mortality was higher for Martin-sepsis than community-acquired sepsis (25.5% versus 10.3%, P = 0.006), as well as for Angus-severe sepsis than community-acquired severe sepsis (25.5 versus 11.5%, P = 0.002). Other baseline characteristics were similar between sepsis groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital discharge diagnoses show good specificity but poor sensitivity for detecting community-acquired sepsis and severe sepsis. While sharing similar baseline subject characteristics as cases identified by hospital record review, discharge diagnoses selected for higher mortality sepsis and severe sepsis cohorts. The epidemiology of a sepsis population may vary with the methods used for sepsis event identification.

摘要

引言

我们评估了医院出院诊断在识别社区获得性脓毒症和严重脓毒症方面的准确性。

方法

我们回顾了基于全国人群的中风地理和种族差异原因(REGARDS)队列中2003年至2012年的379例严重感染住院病例。通过人工查阅病历,我们将标准的社区获得性脓毒症事件定义为入院时存在严重感染且符合≥2条全身炎症反应综合征标准。我们还将标准的社区获得性严重脓毒症事件定义为脓毒症合并>1个序贯器官衰竭评估器官功能障碍。对于相同的住院病例,我们确定了马丁等人和安格斯等人根据国际疾病分类第9版出院诊断所指出的脓毒症和严重脓毒症事件。我们评估了马丁和安格斯标准在检测标准的社区获得性脓毒症和严重脓毒症事件方面的诊断准确性。

结果

在379例住院病例中,有156例社区获得性脓毒症和122例社区获得性严重脓毒症事件。出院诊断确定了55例马丁脓毒症和89例安格斯严重脓毒症事件。马丁脓毒症标准检测社区获得性脓毒症的准确性为:敏感性27.6%;特异性94.6%;阳性预测值(PPV)78.2%;阴性预测值(NPV)65.1%。安格斯严重脓毒症标准检测社区获得性严重脓毒症的准确性为:敏感性42.6%;特异性86.0%;PPV 58.4%;NPV 75.9%。马丁脓毒症的死亡率高于社区获得性脓毒症(25.5%对10.3%,P = 0.),安格斯严重脓毒症的死亡率也高于社区获得性严重脓毒症(25.5%对11.5%,P = 0.002)。脓毒症组之间的其他基线特征相似。

结论

医院出院诊断在检测社区获得性脓毒症和严重脓毒症方面显示出良好的特异性,但敏感性较差。虽然与通过医院记录审查确定的病例具有相似的基线受试者特征,但出院诊断选择的是死亡率较高的脓毒症和严重脓毒症队列。脓毒症人群的流行病学可能因用于识别脓毒症事件的方法而异。

相似文献

7
Updated estimates of sepsis hospitalizations at United States academic medical centers.美国学术医疗中心脓毒症住院情况的最新估计。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2022 Jul 16;3(4):e12782. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12782. eCollection 2022 Aug.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Hospital variations in severe sepsis mortality.医院间严重脓毒症死亡率的差异。
Am J Med Qual. 2015 Jul-Aug;30(4):328-36. doi: 10.1177/1062860614534461. Epub 2014 May 9.
8
A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate.一种估算肾小球滤过率的新公式。
Ann Intern Med. 2009 May 5;150(9):604-12. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验