Department of Surgery/Oncology, St. Pantelimon Hospital, Carol Davila University, Dionisie Lupu Street, no. 37, 020022, Bucharest, Romania.
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2019 May 6;20(6):45. doi: 10.1007/s11864-019-0643-4.
Melanoma is one of the most aggressive forms of cancer, with a high mortality rate in the absence of a safe and curable therapy. As a consequence, several procedures have been tested over time, with the most recent (immunological and targeted) therapies proving to be effective in some patients. Unfortunately, these new treatment options continue to generate debate related to the therapeutic strategy (intended to maximize the long-term results of patients with melanoma), not only about the monotherapy configuration but also regarding association/succession between distinct therapeutic procedures. As an example, targeted therapy with BRAF inhibitors proved to be effective in advanced BRAF-mutant melanoma. However, such treatments with BRAF inhibitors lead to therapy resistance in half of patients after approximately 6 months. Even if most benign nevi incorporate oncogenic BRAF mutations, they rarely become melanoma; therefore, targeted therapy with BRAF inhibitors should be viewed as an incomplete or perfectible therapy. Another example is related to the administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors/ICIs (anti-CTLA-4 antibodies, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies), which are successfully used in metastatic melanoma. It is currently believed that CTLA-4 and PD-1 blockade would favor a strong immune response against cancer cells. The main side effects of ICIs are represented by the development of immune-related adverse events, which in some cases can be lethal. These ICI side effects would thus be not only therapeutically counterproductive but also potentially dangerous. Surprisingly, a subset of immune-related adverse events (especially autoimmune toxicity) seems to be clearly correlated with better therapeutic results, perhaps due to an additional therapeutic effect (currently insufficiently studied/exploited). Contrary to the classical approach of cancer (considered until now an uncontrolled division of cells), a very recent and comprehensive theory describes malignancy as a supracellular disease. Cancerous disease would therefore be a disturbed supracellular process (embryogenesis, growth, development, regeneration, etc.), which imposes/coordinates an increased rhythm of cell division, angiogenesis, immunosuppression, etc. Melanoma is presented from such a supracellular perspective to be able to explain the beneficial role of autoimmunity in cancer (autoimmune abortion/rejection of the melanoma-embryo phenotype) and to create premises to better optimize the newly emerging therapeutic options. Finally, it is suggested that the supracellular evolution of malignancy implies complex supracellular messaging (between the cells and host organism), which would be interfaced especially by the extracellular matrix and noncoding RNA. Therefore, understanding and manipulating supracellular messaging in cancer could open new treatment perspectives in the form of digitized (supracellular) therapy.
黑色素瘤是最具侵袭性的癌症之一,如果没有安全有效的治疗方法,其死亡率很高。因此,随着时间的推移,已经测试了多种方法,最近的(免疫和靶向)疗法已被证明对某些患者有效。不幸的是,这些新的治疗选择继续引发与治疗策略相关的争论(旨在最大限度地提高黑色素瘤患者的长期结果),不仅涉及单药治疗方案,还涉及不同治疗方法的联合/先后顺序。例如,BRAF 抑制剂的靶向治疗已被证明对晚期 BRAF 突变黑色素瘤有效。然而,在大约 6 个月后,接受 BRAF 抑制剂治疗的患者中有一半会产生治疗耐药性。即使大多数良性痣包含致癌 BRAF 突变,但它们很少发展为黑色素瘤;因此,BRAF 抑制剂的靶向治疗应被视为一种不完全或可完善的治疗方法。另一个例子与免疫检查点抑制剂/ICI(抗 CTLA-4 抗体、抗 PD-1/PD-L1 抗体)的使用有关,这些药物已成功用于转移性黑色素瘤。目前认为,CTLA-4 和 PD-1 阻断将有利于针对癌细胞的强烈免疫反应。ICI 的主要副作用表现为免疫相关不良事件的发生,在某些情况下这些不良事件可能是致命的。因此,这些 ICI 副作用不仅在治疗上适得其反,而且可能具有潜在的危险。令人惊讶的是,一部分免疫相关不良事件(特别是自身免疫毒性)似乎与更好的治疗效果明显相关,这可能是由于额外的治疗效果(目前研究/利用不足)。与迄今为止被认为是不受控制的细胞分裂的经典癌症方法相反,一个非常新的全面理论将恶性肿瘤描述为一种超细胞疾病。因此,癌症疾病将是一种受干扰的超细胞过程(胚胎发生、生长、发育、再生等),它强加/协调细胞分裂、血管生成、免疫抑制等的增加节奏。从这种超细胞的角度来看,黑色素瘤可以解释自身免疫在癌症中的有益作用(自身免疫流产/排斥黑色素瘤胚胎表型),并为更好地优化新出现的治疗选择创造前提。最后,有人提出,恶性肿瘤的超细胞进化意味着复杂的超细胞信息传递(细胞之间和宿主生物体之间),这主要通过细胞外基质和非编码 RNA 进行接口。因此,理解和操纵癌症中的超细胞信息传递可以为数字化(超细胞)治疗形式开辟新的治疗前景。