• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[聚乙二醇与乳糖酶:寻求更安全的长期肠内营养技术]

[PEG versus LAP: towards a safer technique for long-term enteral nutrition].

作者信息

González Ruiz Y, Corona Bellostas C, Fernández Atuán R, Bragagnini Rodríguez P, Siles Hinojosa A, Ruiz de Temiño Bravo M, Elías Pollina J

机构信息

Servicio de Cirugía Pediátrica. Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet. Zaragoza.

出版信息

Cir Pediatr. 2019 Apr 22;32(2):69-73.

PMID:31056866
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes and complications between laparoscopic gastrostomies (LG) and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies (PEG).

METHODS

Retrospective review of 79 patients who had their gastrostomies inserted in our hospital (2010-2017). We compared surgical techniques, minor and major complications.

RESULTS

A total of 24 LG (14 males) and 55 PEG (29 males) were performed. The mean age was 4.77 [0.15-15.56] years for LG and 5.37 [0.12-16.58] years for PEG. The median time of presentation of complications was 59 [2-975] days. No statistical differences were found in minor complications between both techniques; however, minor complications were more frequent in LG (54.16% in LG versus 34.55% in PEG), mainly, overgranulation and peristomal leakage. A statistically significant association was found between patients with oncological comorbidity and minor complications (p<0.05).A statistically significant association was found between major complications and PEG (4.17% in LG versus 21.82% in PEG), p=0.045. The major complications were one tube dislodgement in the LG group, and 9 Buried-Bumper syndrome, one colon interposition without perforation, one colon perforation, one omentum interposition, two tube dislodgements and one small bowel perforation in PEG group.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the statistically significant association between major complications and the PEG group, being the higher frequency and severity of these complications with this technique evident; we consider the LG a safer technique. However, studies with larger number of patients and multicentric are necessary.

摘要

目的

比较腹腔镜胃造口术(LG)和经皮内镜胃造口术(PEG)的治疗效果及并发症。

方法

回顾性分析2010年至2017年在我院接受胃造口术的79例患者。比较手术技术、轻微和严重并发症。

结果

共进行了24例LG(14例男性)和55例PEG(29例男性)。LG组的平均年龄为4.77[0.15 - 15.56]岁,PEG组为5.37[0.12 - 16.58]岁。并发症出现的中位时间为59[2 - 975]天。两种技术在轻微并发症方面未发现统计学差异;然而,LG的轻微并发症更常见(LG为54.16%,PEG为34.55%),主要是过度肉芽组织形成和造口周围渗漏。肿瘤合并症患者与轻微并发症之间存在统计学显著关联(p<0.05)。严重并发症与PEG之间存在统计学显著关联(LG为4.17%,PEG为21.82%),p = 0.045。严重并发症在LG组为1例导管移位,PEG组为9例埋入式撞针综合征、1例无穿孔的结肠置入、1例结肠穿孔、1例大网膜置入、2例导管移位和1例小肠穿孔。

结论

鉴于严重并发症与PEG组之间存在统计学显著关联,且该技术的这些并发症频率和严重程度更高;我们认为LG是一种更安全的技术。然而,需要进行更多患者数量和多中心的研究。

相似文献

1
[PEG versus LAP: towards a safer technique for long-term enteral nutrition].[聚乙二醇与乳糖酶:寻求更安全的长期肠内营养技术]
Cir Pediatr. 2019 Apr 22;32(2):69-73.
2
Infant gastrostomy outcomes: The cost of complications.婴儿胃造口术的结果:并发症的代价。
J Pediatr Surg. 2016 Dec;51(12):1976-1982. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.09.025. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
3
Laparoscopic Gastrostomy Is Superior to Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement in Children Less Than 5 years of Age.对于5岁以下儿童,腹腔镜胃造口术优于经皮内镜下胃造口管置入术。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016 Jul;26(7):570-3. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0099. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
4
Comparison of Complications Following Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Gastrostomy Placements.腹腔镜和内镜胃造口术并发症的比较。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Sep;21(9):1396-1403. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3475-1. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
5
Gastrostomy Placement in Children: Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy or Laparoscopic Gastrostomy?儿童胃造口术:经皮内镜下胃造口术还是腹腔镜胃造口术?
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016 Oct;26(5):381-384. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000310.
6
New laparoscopic assisted percutaneous gastrostomy. Description and comparison with others gastrostomy types.新型腹腔镜辅助经皮胃造口术。描述及其与其他类型胃造口术的比较。
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2016 Dec;16:24-29. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Sep 18.
7
A Retrospective Review of Primary Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy and Laparoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement.经皮内镜胃造口术和腹腔镜胃造口术置管的回顾性研究。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2021 Nov 1;73(5):586-591. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003236.
8
Pediatric Gastrostomy Tube Placement: Less Complications Associated with Laparoscopic Approach.小儿胃造口管放置术:腹腔镜入路相关并发症较少。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021 Dec;31(12):1376-1383. doi: 10.1089/lap.2021.0347. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
9
Gastrostomy tube placement outcomes: comparison of surgical, endoscopic, and laparoscopic methods.胃造口管置入结果:手术、内镜和腹腔镜方法的比较。
Nutr Clin Pract. 2005 Dec;20(6):607-12. doi: 10.1177/0115426505020006607.
10
Complications in children with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement.儿童经皮内镜胃造瘘术(PEG)置管的并发症。
World J Pediatr. 2019 Feb;15(1):12-16. doi: 10.1007/s12519-018-0206-y. Epub 2018 Nov 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Pediatric laparoscopic versus percutaneous gastrostomy tube placement: a single-center review.小儿腹腔镜与经皮胃造口管置入术:单中心回顾
Pediatr Surg Int. 2024 Dec 12;41(1):25. doi: 10.1007/s00383-024-05888-6.