Department of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Clinic of Surgical Oncology, St. Elizabeth Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Neoplasma. 2019 Jul 23;66(4):647-651. doi: 10.4149/neo_2018_181130N909. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
The standard approach in the management of cutaneous malignant melanoma is considered to be a complete excision of the primary lesion with an appropriate margin of the normal tissue according to Breslow thickness. Usually sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) can help to determine the nodal status, and thus improve the accuracy of staging of the disease. However, the role of SLNB in melanoma treatment remains controversial. NCCN guidelines strongly support routine performance of therapeutic lymphadenectomy in all melanoma patients with clinically positive nodes without radiographic evidence of distant metastases. Patients with positive SLNB should have had completion lymph node dissection (CLND) for regional disease control. Between 2012 and 2016, 168 consecutive patients underwent surgery for primary cutaneous malignant melanoma at St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute in Bratislava. The indication for SLNB and the procedure was made according to international guidelines. In this retrospective study, a cohort of 78 patients was analyzed (35 women and 43 men). Inclusion criteria comprised patients with cutaneous melanoma with no evidence of distant metastases or clinical lymphadenopathy. SLNB comprised a dual labelling method (Tc-99m Nanocolloid / blue dye) in a one-day protocol. Median follow-up was 657 days. The primary composite outcome was the time to the first disease-related event (death, reintervention, worsening of symptoms). Primary outcome measures were overall (disease-specific) and disease-free survival. The overall identification rate of SLN in melanoma patients by dual labelling method was 98.5%. All patients with positive SLNB on frozen section underwent complete regional lymphadenectomy. Using multivariable analysis Breslow thickness of the lesion (p=0.00004, HR 4.03 on logarithmic scale) was identified as the strongest independent predictor of the disease-free survival (DFS) and male gender was significant predictor of DFS. An increase in tumor thickness was associated with significantly higher risk of an event. Neither SLN positivity nor initial S-100 level proved to be significant predictors of the event at the 0.05 level of probability. Multidisciplinary approach represents the gold standard of care for melanoma patients and surgery remains the best option for most localized cases. Although the usefulness of SLNB procedure has been questioned, it provides an excellent staging method, moreover, it can identify high-risk patients. The routine use of completion lymphadenectomy after a positive SLNB is still controversial. It is not clear whether CLND following a positive SLN biopsy improves survival but it could provide regional disease control.
在皮肤恶性黑色素瘤的治疗中,标准方法被认为是根据 Breslow 厚度对原发性病变进行完整切除,并切除适当的正常组织边缘。通常,前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)有助于确定淋巴结状态,从而提高疾病分期的准确性。然而,SLNB 在黑色素瘤治疗中的作用仍存在争议。NCCN 指南强烈支持对所有临床淋巴结阳性且无远处转移影像学证据的黑色素瘤患者常规进行治疗性淋巴结清扫。SLNB 阳性的患者应进行区域疾病控制的完全淋巴结清扫(CLND)。2012 年至 2016 年,168 例连续皮肤恶性黑色素瘤患者在布拉迪斯拉发的圣伊丽莎白癌症研究所接受手术治疗。SLNB 的适应证和程序均根据国际指南进行。在这项回顾性研究中,对 78 例患者(35 名女性和 43 名男性)进行了分析。纳入标准包括无远处转移或临床淋巴结病的皮肤黑色素瘤患者。SLNB 采用 Tc-99m 纳米胶体/蓝色染料的双重标记法,在一天的方案中进行。中位随访时间为 657 天。主要复合结局是首次疾病相关事件(死亡、再干预、症状恶化)的时间。主要的结局测量指标是总生存率(疾病特异性)和无病生存率。采用双重标记法,黑色素瘤患者 SLN 的总体识别率为 98.5%。所有冷冻切片阳性的 SLNB 患者均行完全区域淋巴结清扫术。多变量分析显示,病变 Breslow 厚度(p=0.00004,对数刻度上的 HR 为 4.03)是无病生存率(DFS)的最强独立预测因子,男性是 DFS 的显著预测因子。肿瘤厚度增加与事件发生的风险显著相关。SLN 阳性或初始 S-100 水平均未证明在概率水平 0.05 时是事件的显著预测因子。多学科方法是黑色素瘤患者护理的金标准,手术仍然是大多数局限性病例的最佳选择。尽管 SLNB 手术的有用性受到质疑,但它提供了一种极好的分期方法,此外,它还可以识别高危患者。在 SLNB 阳性后常规行完全淋巴结清扫术仍存在争议。尚不清楚 SLN 活检阳性后行 CLND 是否能提高生存率,但它可以提供区域疾病控制。