Validity of Natural Language Processing for Ascertainment of and Test Results in SEER Cases of Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE

SEER registries do not report results of epidermal growth factor receptor () and anaplastic lymphoma kinase () mutation tests. To facilitate population-based research in molecularly defined subgroups of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we assessed the validity of natural language processing (NLP) for the ascertainment of EGFR and ALK testing from electronic pathology (e-path) reports of NSCLC cases included in two SEER registries: the Cancer Surveillance System (CSS) and the Kentucky Cancer Registry (KCR).

METHODS

We obtained 4,278 e-path reports from 1,634 patients who were diagnosed with stage IV nonsquamous NSCLC from September 1, 2011, to December 31, 2013, included in CSS. We used 855 CSS reports to train NLP systems for the ascertainment of and test status (reported not reported) and test results (positive negative). We assessed sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values in an internal validation sample of 3,423 CSS e-path reports and repeated the analysis in an external sample of 1,041 e-path reports from 565 KCR patients. Two oncologists manually reviewed all e-path reports to generate gold-standard data sets.

RESULTS

NLP systems yielded internal validity metrics that ranged from 0.95 to 1.00 for and test status and results in CSS e-path reports. NLP showed high internal accuracy for the ascertainment of and in CSS patients-F scores of 0.95 and 0.96, respectively. In the external validation analysis, NLP yielded metrics that ranged from 0.02 to 0.96 in KCR reports and F scores of 0.70 and 0.72, respectively, in KCR patients.

CONCLUSION

NLP is an internally valid method for the ascertainment of and test information from e-path reports available in SEER registries, but future work is necessary to increase NLP external validity.