• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

蒙特利尔认知评估测验在少数族裔群体中的辨别能力。

Discriminative Ability of Montreal Cognitive Assessment Subtests and Items in Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups.

机构信息

Sealy Center on Aging, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX.

Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, College of Public Health and Health Professions.

出版信息

Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2019 Jul-Sep;33(3):226-232. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000310.

DOI:10.1097/WAD.0000000000000310
PMID:31058685
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6710139/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a popular screening tool for Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). The psychometric properties of the MoCA have not been widely examined in minority groups. We aimed to analyze the discriminate ability of subtests and items by race and ethnicity given gold-standard clinical diagnosis of cognitive status.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the National Alzheimer Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set March 2018 data freeze. Stepwise regression was used to determine which subtests predicted cognitive status (normal cognition, MCI, or dementia), by race/ethnicity. Item discrimination and difficulty was calculated by race/ethnicity and cognitive status.

RESULTS

In our sample (n=3895), with an average age of 69.7, 80.7% were non-Hispanic white, 15.0% were non-Hispanic black, and 4.2% were Hispanic. Among non-Hispanic whites all subtests, education, and age predicted clinician diagnosis, while visuospatial/executive, attention, language, delayed recall, and orientation subtests were predictive among non-Hispanic blacks and visuospatial/executive, delayed recall, and orientation subtests and education were predictive among Hispanics. Item discrimination and difficulty varied by race/ethnicity and cognitive status.

CONCLUSIONS

By understanding the psychometric properties of MoCA subtests, we can focus on subtests that have higher discrimination and more diagnostic utility. Subtests should be further evaluated for use in screening of minority individuals.

摘要

简介

蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)是一种常用于轻度认知障碍(MCI)的筛查工具。MoCA 的心理测量特性在少数群体中尚未得到广泛研究。我们旨在根据认知状态的金标准临床诊断,分析种族和民族群体中各亚测试和项目的区分能力。

方法

我们分析了 2018 年 3 月国家阿尔茨海默病协调中心统一数据集冻结的数据。逐步回归用于根据种族/民族确定哪些亚测试预测认知状态(正常认知、MCI 或痴呆)。按种族/民族和认知状态计算项目的区分度和难度。

结果

在我们的样本(n=3895)中,平均年龄为 69.7 岁,80.7%为非西班牙裔白人,15.0%为非西班牙裔黑人,4.2%为西班牙裔。在非西班牙裔白人群体中,所有亚测试、教育和年龄均预测了临床医生的诊断,而在非西班牙裔黑人和西班牙裔中,视空间/执行、注意力、语言、延迟回忆和定向亚测试具有预测性,而视空间/执行、延迟回忆和定向亚测试和教育具有预测性。项目的区分度和难度因种族/民族和认知状态而异。

结论

通过了解 MoCA 亚测试的心理测量特性,我们可以专注于具有更高区分度和更多诊断效用的亚测试。应进一步评估亚测试用于筛查少数群体个体。

相似文献

1
Discriminative Ability of Montreal Cognitive Assessment Subtests and Items in Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups.蒙特利尔认知评估测验在少数族裔群体中的辨别能力。
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2019 Jul-Sep;33(3):226-232. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000310.
2
Validation of Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Discriminant Power of Montreal Cognitive Assessment Subtests in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer Dementia in Turkish Population.蒙特利尔认知评估量表在土耳其轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病痴呆患者中的效度验证及蒙特利尔认知评估量表各子测验的鉴别力研究
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2014 Jun;27(2):103-9. doi: 10.1177/0891988714522701. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
3
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment After Omission of Hearing-Dependent Subtests: Psychometrics and Clinical Recommendations.省略听力依赖测试后的蒙特利尔认知评估:心理计量学和临床建议。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Aug;67(8):1689-1694. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15940. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
4
A subtest analysis of the Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA): which subtests can best discriminate between healthy controls, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease?蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)的子测验分析:哪些子测验能最佳区分健康对照、轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病?
Int Psychogeriatr. 2016 May;28(5):825-32. doi: 10.1017/S1041610215001982. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
5
Optimal cutoffs for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment vary by race and ethnicity.蒙特利尔认知评估量表的最佳临界值因种族和民族而异。
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2018 Nov 3;10:773-781. doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2018.09.003. eCollection 2018.
6
An Abbreviated Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) for Dementia Screening.用于痴呆筛查的简化蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)
Clin Neuropsychol. 2015;29(4):413-25. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2015.1043349. Epub 2015 May 15.
7
Accuracy and Psychometric Properties of the Brazilian Version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment as a Brief Screening Tool for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease in the Initial Stages in the Elderly.《蒙特利尔认知评估巴西版作为老年人轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病初始阶段简易筛查工具的准确性和心理测量学特性》
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2019;47(4-6):366-374. doi: 10.1159/000501308. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
8
Limitations for interpreting failure on individual subtests of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment.蒙特利尔认知评估的个别子测试失败的解释限制。
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2013 Mar;26(1):19-28. doi: 10.1177/0891988712473802. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
9
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Performance and Domain-Specific Index Scores in Amnestic Aphasic Dementia.遗忘型失语性痴呆的蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)表现和特定领域指数评分。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2020 Oct;26(9):927-931. doi: 10.1017/S135561772000048X. Epub 2020 May 19.
10
Effects of Normative Adjustments to the Montreal Cognitive Assessment.蒙特利尔认知评估量表的常模调整效应。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 Dec;26(12):1258-1267. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2018.09.009. Epub 2018 Sep 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of racialization on neuroimaging and plasma biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease.种族化对阿尔茨海默病神经影像学和血浆生物标志物的影响。
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Jul;21(7):e70463. doi: 10.1002/alz.70463.
2
The East London Parkinson's disease project - a case-control study of Parkinson's Disease in a diverse population.东伦敦帕金森病项目——一项针对多样化人群的帕金森病病例对照研究。
NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2025 Jun 17;11(1):172. doi: 10.1038/s41531-025-01031-x.
3
Integrating the Memory Support Intervention into the Transdiagnostic Intervention for Sleep and Circadian Dysfunction (TranS-C): can improving memory for treatment in midlife and older adults improve patient outcomes? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.将记忆支持干预纳入睡眠和昼夜节律功能障碍的跨诊断干预(TranS-C)中:改善中年和老年人的治疗记忆是否能改善患者的结局?一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Oct 3;25(1):650. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08468-0.
4
Improving diagnostic accuracy of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment to identify post-stroke cognitive impairment.提高蒙特利尔认知评估对识别中风后认知障碍的诊断准确性。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 29;14(1):20125. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71184-x.
5
Psychometric Reliability, Validity, and Generalizability of MoCA in American Indian Adults: The Strong Heart Study.美国印第安成年人中蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)的心理测量学可靠性、有效性及可推广性:强心研究
Assessment. 2025 Jun;32(4):608-621. doi: 10.1177/10731911241261436. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
6
Dementia among Minority Populations: A Scoping Review of Meaning, Language, and Translation.少数民族人群中的痴呆症:意义、语言和翻译的范围综述。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2024;53(4):217-228. doi: 10.1159/000539446. Epub 2024 May 22.
7
Evaluating Cognitive Impairment in a Large Health Care System: The Cognition in Primary Care Program.在大型医疗保健系统中评估认知障碍:初级保健计划中的认知。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2024;99(2):493-501. doi: 10.3233/JAD-231200.
8
Prevalence, Demographic, and Clinical Factors Associated With Cognitive Dysfunction in Patients With Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder.视神经脊髓炎谱系疾病患者认知功能障碍的流行率、人口统计学和临床相关因素。
Neurology. 2024 Jan 9;102(1):e207965. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207965. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
9
Implementation of the telephone montreal cognitive assessment in a telemedicine based pre-admission testing clinic during COVID-19.在 COVID-19 期间,在一家基于远程医疗的入院前检测诊所实施电话版蒙特利尔认知评估。
Perioper Care Oper Room Manag. 2021 Sep;24:100191. doi: 10.1016/j.pcorm.2021.100191. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
10
Severity of functional impairments by race and sex in older patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure.老年急性失代偿性心力衰竭住院患者的种族和性别功能障碍严重程度。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Dec;70(12):3447-3457. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18006. Epub 2022 Aug 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimal cutoffs for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment vary by race and ethnicity.蒙特利尔认知评估量表的最佳临界值因种族和民族而异。
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2018 Nov 3;10:773-781. doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2018.09.003. eCollection 2018.
2
A re-examination of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) cutoff scores.蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)临界值的重新审视。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;33(2):379-388. doi: 10.1002/gps.4756. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
3
Montreal Cognitive Assessment Performance among Community-Dwelling African Americans.社区居住的非裔美国人的蒙特利尔认知评估表现
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2017 Mar 1;32(2):238-244. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acw095.
4
A Comparison of the Prevalence of Dementia in the United States in 2000 and 2012.2000年与2012年美国痴呆症患病率比较
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jan 1;177(1):51-58. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6807.
5
Defining and validating a short form Montreal Cognitive Assessment (s-MoCA) for use in neurodegenerative disease.定义并验证一种用于神经退行性疾病的简易蒙特利尔认知评估量表(s-MoCA)。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016 Dec;87(12):1303-1310. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2015-312723. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
6
Inequalities in dementia incidence between six racial and ethnic groups over 14 years.14年间六个种族和民族群体在痴呆症发病率上的不平等。
Alzheimers Dement. 2016 Mar;12(3):216-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2015.12.007. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
7
A subtest analysis of the Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA): which subtests can best discriminate between healthy controls, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease?蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)的子测验分析:哪些子测验能最佳区分健康对照、轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病?
Int Psychogeriatr. 2016 May;28(5):825-32. doi: 10.1017/S1041610215001982. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
8
Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Modified Mini Mental State Examination in African Americans.非裔美国人的蒙特利尔认知评估和改良简易精神状态检查表
J Aging Res. 2015;2015:872018. doi: 10.1155/2015/872018. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
9
An Abbreviated Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) for Dementia Screening.用于痴呆筛查的简化蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)
Clin Neuropsychol. 2015;29(4):413-25. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2015.1043349. Epub 2015 May 15.
10
Validity of the montreal cognitive assessment as a screen for mild cognitive impairment and dementia in African Americans.蒙特利尔认知评估作为非裔美国人轻度认知障碍和痴呆筛查工具的有效性。
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2014 Sep;27(3):199-203. doi: 10.1177/0891988714524630. Epub 2014 Mar 10.