Jacobs J, Wyant S
Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1987 Apr;21(4):373-9. doi: 10.1177/106002808702100415.
Medical records of 1137 patients from 35 hospitals were reviewed to examine the total cost of care for patients receiving cefoperazone as initial therapy compared to a control group receiving alternative agents. The direct costs of care measurable through a retrospective review of patient records were examined, including the cost of antibiotic acquisition, drug administration, laboratory testing, and room and board. Results of a regression analysis show that cefoperazone as initial therapy is associated with lower costs for all factors studied except acquisition cost. Antibiotic acquisition averaged $24 per patient more for the cefoperazone group (p less than 0.01). However, for cefoperazone patients drug administration was $63 less (p less than 0.0001), laboratory testing costs averaged $9 less (p = 0.22), and costs associated with room and board charges were $80 less (p = 0.40). Total costs averaged $3073 per cefoperazone patient and $3228 per control patient (p = 0.20). These data suggest that the previously accepted definitions of antimicrobial costs (i.e., cost per gram, cost per dose, cost per day) may no longer be adequate in this era of cost containment. In order to make sound clinical decisions with lowest total costs, practitioners should identify how and where costs are incurred.
研究人员回顾了35家医院1137名患者的病历,以检查接受头孢哌酮作为初始治疗的患者与接受替代药物的对照组相比的总护理成本。通过回顾患者病历可衡量的直接护理成本进行了检查,包括抗生素采购、药物给药、实验室检测以及食宿费用。回归分析结果表明,除采购成本外,头孢哌酮作为初始治疗与所有研究因素的较低成本相关。头孢哌酮组患者的抗生素采购平均每位患者多24美元(p<0.01)。然而,对于使用头孢哌酮的患者,药物给药费用少63美元(p<0.0001),实验室检测成本平均少9美元(p = 0.22),食宿费用少80美元(p = 0.40)。头孢哌酮组患者的总费用平均为每位3073美元,对照组患者为每位3228美元(p = 0.20)。这些数据表明,在这个成本控制时代,先前公认的抗菌药物成本定义(即每克成本、每剂成本、每天成本)可能不再适用。为了以最低的总成本做出合理的临床决策,从业者应确定成本产生的方式和地点。