• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢哌酮治疗的经济学考察

Economic examination of cefoperazone therapy.

作者信息

Jacobs J, Wyant S

出版信息

Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1987 Apr;21(4):373-9. doi: 10.1177/106002808702100415.

DOI:10.1177/106002808702100415
PMID:3105992
Abstract

Medical records of 1137 patients from 35 hospitals were reviewed to examine the total cost of care for patients receiving cefoperazone as initial therapy compared to a control group receiving alternative agents. The direct costs of care measurable through a retrospective review of patient records were examined, including the cost of antibiotic acquisition, drug administration, laboratory testing, and room and board. Results of a regression analysis show that cefoperazone as initial therapy is associated with lower costs for all factors studied except acquisition cost. Antibiotic acquisition averaged $24 per patient more for the cefoperazone group (p less than 0.01). However, for cefoperazone patients drug administration was $63 less (p less than 0.0001), laboratory testing costs averaged $9 less (p = 0.22), and costs associated with room and board charges were $80 less (p = 0.40). Total costs averaged $3073 per cefoperazone patient and $3228 per control patient (p = 0.20). These data suggest that the previously accepted definitions of antimicrobial costs (i.e., cost per gram, cost per dose, cost per day) may no longer be adequate in this era of cost containment. In order to make sound clinical decisions with lowest total costs, practitioners should identify how and where costs are incurred.

摘要

研究人员回顾了35家医院1137名患者的病历,以检查接受头孢哌酮作为初始治疗的患者与接受替代药物的对照组相比的总护理成本。通过回顾患者病历可衡量的直接护理成本进行了检查,包括抗生素采购、药物给药、实验室检测以及食宿费用。回归分析结果表明,除采购成本外,头孢哌酮作为初始治疗与所有研究因素的较低成本相关。头孢哌酮组患者的抗生素采购平均每位患者多24美元(p<0.01)。然而,对于使用头孢哌酮的患者,药物给药费用少63美元(p<0.0001),实验室检测成本平均少9美元(p = 0.22),食宿费用少80美元(p = 0.40)。头孢哌酮组患者的总费用平均为每位3073美元,对照组患者为每位3228美元(p = 0.20)。这些数据表明,在这个成本控制时代,先前公认的抗菌药物成本定义(即每克成本、每剂成本、每天成本)可能不再适用。为了以最低的总成本做出合理的临床决策,从业者应确定成本产生的方式和地点。

相似文献

1
Economic examination of cefoperazone therapy.头孢哌酮治疗的经济学考察
Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1987 Apr;21(4):373-9. doi: 10.1177/106002808702100415.
2
Cefoperazone versus ceftazidime monotherapy of nosocomial pneumonia.头孢哌酮与头孢他啶单药治疗医院获得性肺炎的比较
Am J Med. 1988 Jul 25;85(1A):44-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(88)90174-x.
3
[Comparative clinical and epidemiological evaluation of beta-lactam antibiotics in the treatment of intraabdominal infections].β-内酰胺类抗生素治疗腹腔内感染的比较临床和流行病学评估
Antibiot Khimioter. 2003;48(3):34-41.
4
Cost-effectiveness study comparing cefoperazone-sulbactam to a three-drug combination for treating intraabdominal infections in an Indian health-care setting.在印度医疗环境中比较头孢哌酮-舒巴坦与三联药物组合治疗腹腔内感染的成本效益研究。
Value Health. 2008 Mar;11 Suppl 1:S33-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00364.x.
5
Cefoperazone versus combination antibiotic therapy of hospital-acquired pneumonia.头孢哌酮与联合抗生素治疗医院获得性肺炎的对比
Am J Med. 1988 Jan;84(1):68-74. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(88)90010-1.
6
[Evidence-based medicine, health costs and treatment of intra-abdominal infection].[循证医学、医疗成本与腹腔内感染的治疗]
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 1999;17 Suppl 2:86-94.
7
Cost-effectiveness of prospective and continuous parenteral antibiotic control: experience at the Palo Alto Veterans Affairs Medical Center from 1987 to 1989.前瞻性和持续性肠外抗生素控制的成本效益:1987年至1989年帕洛阿尔托退伍军人事务医疗中心的经验。
Am J Med. 1991 Apr;90(4):439-44.
8
Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of antibiotic monitoring at a Veterans Administration hospital.
Chemotherapy. 1991;37 Suppl 3:22-5. doi: 10.1159/000238929.
9
Effectiveness and Safety of Generic Formulation of Cefoperazone/Sulbactam (Bacticep®) in Treatment of Infections at Siriraj Hospital.头孢哌酮/舒巴坦(Bacticep®)通用制剂在诗里拉吉医院治疗感染的有效性和安全性
J Med Assoc Thai. 2016 Jan;99(1):8-14.
10
Hospital and societal costs of antimicrobial-resistant infections in a Chicago teaching hospital: implications for antibiotic stewardship.芝加哥一家教学医院中耐抗菌药物感染的医院及社会成本:对抗生素管理的启示
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Oct 15;49(8):1175-84. doi: 10.1086/605630.