Suppr超能文献

采用双边 8 字形线圈或 H1 线圈重复经颅磁刺激治疗重性抑郁障碍的疗效:一项随机临床试验。

Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation using a figure-8-coil or an H1-Coil in treatment of major depressive disorder; A randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Psychiatric Hospital "Sveti Ivan", Zagreb, Croatia; Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.

Department of Psychological Medicine, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.

出版信息

J Psychiatr Res. 2019 Jul;114:113-119. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.04.020. Epub 2019 Apr 26.

Abstract

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an evidence-based treatment option for major depressive disorder (MDD). However, comparisons of efficacy between the two FDA-approved protocols of rTMS modalities are lacking. The aim of this industry-independent, randomized-controlled, single-blind trial was to evaluate clinical outcome of the two FDA-approved rTMS protocols delivered by H1-coil and the figure-8-coil, in MDD patients. A total of 228 MDD patients were randomized to 20 sessions of H1-coil or 8-coil as an adjunct to standard-of-care pharmacotherapy, or standard-of-care pharmacotherapy alone. Baseline MDD symptom severity was almost the same in the three groups. Hamilton depression rating scale (HAM-D17) mean score was 17 (5.3) in H1-coil, 17 (5.4) in 8-coil, and 19 (6.1) in control group. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving remission defined as HAM-D17 score ≤7 at end-of-treatment at week-4. In the intention-to-treat analysis odds ratio for remission was 1.74 (CI95% 0.79-3.83) in H1-coil compared to the 8-coil group. The difference between two rTMS protocols was not significant. Remission rate was significantly greater in both HF-rTMS groups compared to the control: 60% (CI95% 48-71%), 43% (CI95% 31-55%) and 11% (CI95% 5-20%) respectively. The response was significantly better in H1-coil, than in 8-coil group OR = 2.33; CI95% 1.04-5.21 (P = 0.040). The HAM-D17 was lowered by 59% in the H1-coil, 41% in the 8-coil (P = 0.048), and 17% in the control group (P < 0.001 vs H1-coil; P = 0.003 vs 8-coil). Safety, tolerability, and the changes in quality of life were comparable. We confirmed the safety and efficacy of both FDA-approved protocols as adjunctive treatments of MDD. Better response rate and greater reduction of depression severity were observed in the H1-coil group, but without a significant difference in the remission rate between the two rTMS modalities. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.govNCT02917499.

摘要

重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)是一种治疗重度抑郁症(MDD)的循证治疗选择。然而,缺乏两种经 FDA 批准的 rTMS 模式疗效的比较。本行业独立、随机对照、单盲试验的目的是评估 H1 线圈和 8 线圈在 MDD 患者中的两种经 FDA 批准的 rTMS 方案的临床疗效。共有 228 名 MDD 患者被随机分配到 20 次 H1 线圈或 8 线圈治疗,作为标准药物治疗的辅助治疗,或单独接受标准药物治疗。三组患者的基线 MDD 症状严重程度几乎相同。Hamilton 抑郁量表(HAM-D17)评分在 H1 线圈组为 17(5.3),在 8 线圈组为 17(5.4),在对照组为 19(6.1)。主要结局是在第 4 周结束时达到缓解定义为 HAM-D17 评分≤7 的患者比例。在意向治疗分析中,与 8 线圈组相比,H1 线圈组的缓解比值比为 1.74(95%CI95%0.79-3.83)。两种 rTMS 方案之间的差异无统计学意义。HF-rTMS 组的缓解率均显著高于对照组:60%(95%CI95%48-71%)、43%(95%CI95%31-55%)和 11%(95%CI95%5-20%)。与 8 线圈组相比,H1 线圈组的反应明显更好,OR=2.33;95%CI95%1.04-5.21(P=0.040)。H1 线圈组 HAM-D17 降低 59%,8 线圈组降低 41%(P=0.048),对照组降低 17%(P<0.001 与 H1 线圈相比;P=0.003 与 8 线圈相比)。安全性、耐受性和生活质量的变化相当。我们证实了两种经 FDA 批准的方案作为 MDD 的辅助治疗的安全性和有效性。H1 线圈组的反应率更高,抑郁严重程度的降低更大,但两种 rTMS 模式的缓解率无显著差异。临床试验注册:Clinicaltrials.govNCT02917499。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验