University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado (J.K.C.).
University of Rochester, Rochester, New York (S.F., M.S.).
Ann Intern Med. 2019 May 7;170(9_Suppl):S46-S53. doi: 10.7326/M18-2011.
Medications contribute to patients' out-of-pocket costs, yet most clinicians do not routinely screen for patients' cost-of-medication (COM) concerns.
To assess whether a single training session improves COM conversations.
Before-after cross-sectional surveys of patients and qualitative interviews with clinicians and staff.
7 primary care practices in 3 U.S. states.
In total, 700 patients were surveyed from May 2017 to January 2018: 50 patients per practice before the intervention and another 50 patients per practice after the intervention. Eligibility criteria included age 18 years or older and taking 1 or more long-term medications. Qualitative interviews with 45 staff members were conducted.
A single 60-minute training session for clinicians and staff from each practice on COM importance, team-based screening, and cost-saving strategies.
Patient data (demographics, number of long-term medications, total monthly out-of-pocket medication costs, and history of cost-related medication nonadherence) were obtained immediately before and 3 months after the intervention. Practice staff were interviewed 3 months after the intervention.
A total of 700 patient surveys were completed. Frequency of COM discussion improved in 6 of the 7 practices and remained unchanged in 1 practice. Overall, COM conversations with patients increased from 17% at baseline to 32% postintervention (P = 0.00). There was substantial heterogeneity among sites in before-after differences in patient-reported out-of-pocket COM. Qualitative analyses from key informant interviews showed wide variation in implementation of screening approaches, workflow, adoption of a team-based approach, and strategies for addressing COM.
It is not known whether improvements in COM conversations were sustained beyond 3 months.
A single team training to screen and address patients' medication cost concerns improved COM discussions over the short term. Further research is needed to assess sustained effects and impact on patient costs and medication adherence and to determine whether more intensive, scalable interventions are needed.
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
药物会增加患者的自付费用,但大多数临床医生并没有常规筛查患者的药物费用(COM)问题。
评估单次培训是否能改善 COM 对话。
在三个美国州的 7 个初级保健实践中,对患者进行前后横断面调查,并对临床医生和工作人员进行定性访谈。
共有 700 名患者参与了 2017 年 5 月至 2018 年 1 月的调查:干预前每个实践 50 名患者,干预后每个实践 50 名患者。入选标准包括年龄 18 岁或以上,服用 1 种或多种长期药物。对 45 名工作人员进行了定性访谈。
对每个实践的临床医生和工作人员进行一次 60 分钟的培训,内容包括 COM 的重要性、基于团队的筛查以及节省成本的策略。
在干预前后立即获得患者数据(人口统计学、长期药物数量、每月总自付药物费用和与费用相关的药物不依从史)。在干预后 3 个月对实践工作人员进行了访谈。
共完成 700 份患者调查。7 个实践中有 6 个实践的 COM 讨论频率有所提高,1 个实践没有变化。总体而言,与患者的 COM 对话从基线时的 17%增加到干预后的 32%(P=0.00)。在患者报告的自付 COM 前后差异方面,各站点之间存在很大的异质性。来自主要知情人访谈的定性分析显示,筛查方法、工作流程、采用团队方法以及解决 COM 的策略存在广泛差异。
尚不清楚 COM 对话的改善是否能持续 3 个月以上。
单次团队培训以筛查和解决患者的药物费用问题,可在短期内改善 COM 对话。需要进一步研究以评估持续效果以及对患者费用和药物依从性的影响,并确定是否需要更密集、可扩展的干预措施。
罗伯特伍德约翰逊基金会。