• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国内科医生与患者讨论医疗费用的观点:结构访谈和调查。

U.S. Internists' Perspectives on Discussing Cost of Care With Patients: Structured Interviews and a Survey.

机构信息

California State University, Sacramento, California (S.L.P.).

American College of Physicians, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (A.W., S.R., C.D.S., W.N.).

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2019 May 7;170(9_Suppl):S39-S45. doi: 10.7326/M18-2136.

DOI:10.7326/M18-2136
PMID:31060057
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rising out-of-pocket costs are creating a need for cost conversations between patients and physicians.

OBJECTIVE

To understand the factors that influence physicians to discuss and consider cost during a patient encounter.

DESIGN

Mixed-methods study using semistructured interviews and a survey.

SETTING

United States.

PARTICIPANTS

20 internal medicine physicians were interviewed; 621 internal medicine physician members of the American College of Physicians completed the survey.

MEASUREMENTS

Interviews were analyzed by using thematic analysis, and surveys were analyzed by using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

From the interviews, 4 themes were identified: Physicians are 1) aware that patients are struggling to afford medical care; 2) relying on clues from patients that hint at their cost sensitivity; 3) relying on experience to anticipate potentially high-cost treatments; and 4) aware that patients are making financial trade-offs to afford their care. Three quarters (n = 466) of survey respondents stated that they consider out-of-pocket costs when making most clinical decisions. For 31% (n = 191) of participants, there were times in the past year that they wanted to discuss out-of-pocket prescription drug costs with patients but did not. The most influential factors for ordering a test are the desire to be as thorough as possible (71% [n = 422]) and insurance coverage for the test (68% [n = 422]).

LIMITATION

Findings are self-reported, the sample is limited to a single specialty, the survey response rate was low, information on the patient population was limited, and the survey instrument is not validated.

CONCLUSION

Physicians are attuned to the burden of health care costs and are willing to consider alternative options based on a patient's cost sensitivity.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

摘要

背景

不断上涨的自付费用使得患者和医生之间需要进行成本对话。

目的

了解影响医生在患者就诊时讨论和考虑成本的因素。

设计

采用半结构式访谈和调查的混合方法研究。

地点

美国。

参与者

对 20 名内科医生进行了访谈;美国内科医师学会的 621 名内科医生成员完成了调查。

测量

通过主题分析对访谈进行分析,通过描述性统计对调查进行分析。

结果

从访谈中确定了 4 个主题:医生 1)意识到患者在努力负担医疗保健费用;2)依赖患者提供的线索来暗示他们的成本敏感性;3)依靠经验来预测潜在的高成本治疗方法;4)意识到患者为了负担他们的护理费用正在做出财务权衡。四分之三(n=466)的调查受访者表示,他们在做出大多数临床决策时会考虑自付费用。对于 31%(n=191)的参与者来说,在过去的一年中,他们有时想与患者讨论自付处方药费用,但没有这样做。开检验的最具影响力的因素是尽可能彻底的愿望(71%[n=422])和检验的保险覆盖范围(68%[n=422])。

局限性

研究结果是自我报告的,样本仅限于单一专业,调查的回复率很低,患者人群的信息有限,调查工具未经过验证。

结论

医生对医疗保健费用的负担很敏感,并愿意根据患者的成本敏感性考虑替代方案。

主要资金来源

罗伯特伍德约翰逊基金会。

相似文献

1
U.S. Internists' Perspectives on Discussing Cost of Care With Patients: Structured Interviews and a Survey.美国内科医生与患者讨论医疗费用的观点:结构访谈和调查。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 May 7;170(9_Suppl):S39-S45. doi: 10.7326/M18-2136.
2
Workflow Requirements for Cost-of-Care Conversations in Outpatient Settings Providing Oncology or Primary Care: A Qualitative, Human-Centered Design Study.在提供肿瘤学或初级保健的门诊环境中进行成本效益对话的工作流程要求:一项定性、以用户为中心的设计研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 May 7;170(9_Suppl):S70-S78. doi: 10.7326/M18-2227.
3
Understanding patients' attitudes toward communication about the cost of cancer care.了解患者对癌症护理费用沟通的态度。
J Oncol Pract. 2012 Jul;8(4):e50-8. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000418. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
4
Perspectives on Conversations About Costs of Cancer Care of Breast Cancer Survivors and Cancer Center Staff: A Qualitative Study.关于乳腺癌幸存者和癌症中心工作人员讨论癌症治疗费用的观点:一项定性研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 May 7;170(9_Suppl):S54-S61. doi: 10.7326/M18-2117.
5
Using Public Cost Information During Low Back Pain Visits: A Qualitative Study.在腰痛就诊时使用公共成本信息:一项定性研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 May 7;170(9_Suppl):S93-S102. doi: 10.7326/M18-2223.
6
Addressing Medication Costs During Primary Care Visits: A Before-After Study of Team-Based Training.解决初级保健就诊中的药物费用问题:基于团队的培训前后研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 May 7;170(9_Suppl):S46-S53. doi: 10.7326/M18-2011.
7
Cost-of-Care Conversations During Clinical Visits in Federally Qualified Health Centers: An Observational Study.临床访视中医疗保健成本的讨论:一项观察性研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 May 7;170(9_Suppl):S87-S92. doi: 10.7326/M18-1608.
8
Patient-physician communication about out-of-pocket costs.医患之间关于自付费用的沟通。
JAMA. 2003 Aug 20;290(7):953-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.7.953.
9
Cost in Hand Surgery: The Patient Perspective.手外科治疗费用:患者视角
J Hand Surg Am. 2019 Nov;44(11):992.e1-992.e26. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.01.009. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
10
Community-Designed Messaging Interventions to Improve Cost-of-Care Conversations in Settings Serving Low-Income, Latino Populations.面向服务低收入拉美裔人群的社区设计信息干预措施,以改善医疗成本相关的沟通。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 May 7;170(9_Suppl):S79-S86. doi: 10.7326/M18-2140.

引用本文的文献

1
A Financial Toxicity Screening and Care Coordination Quality Improvement Program in a Gynecology Oncology Urban Practice.一项针对城市妇科肿瘤实践的财务毒性筛查与护理协调质量改进计划。
J Adv Pract Oncol. 2024 Jan;15(1):16-27. doi: 10.6004/jadpro.2024.15.1.2. Epub 2024 Jan 1.
2
Impact of a Standardized, Pharmacist-Initiated "Test-Claim" Workflow for Anticipating Barriers to Accessing Discharge Antimicrobials.标准化的、由药剂师发起的“检测-申请”工作流程对预测出院抗菌药物获取障碍的影响。
J Pharm Technol. 2023 Oct;39(5):218-223. doi: 10.1177/87551225231196047. Epub 2023 Sep 2.
3
The potential impact of introducing a cost tool to facilitate cost-of-care conversations in routine OB care: Lessons from the CONTINUE pilot study.
引入成本工具以促进常规产科护理中护理成本对话的潜在影响:来自CONTINUE试点研究的经验教训。
PEC Innov. 2023 Feb 15;2:100136. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100136. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Where Do Real-Time Prescription Benefit Tools Fit in the Landscape of High US Prescription Medication Costs? A Narrative Review.美国高处方药费用背景下,实时处方效益工具的定位如何?一篇叙述性综述。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Mar;38(4):1038-1045. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07945-z. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
5
Understanding the role of financial health literacy in midlife and old age: A scoping review.理解金融健康素养在中年和老年中的作用:范围综述。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e3921-e3933. doi: 10.1111/hsc.14101. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
6
Physician Perspectives on Implementation of Real-Time Benefit Tools: A Qualitative Study.医生视角下实时获益工具的实施情况:一项定性研究。
Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Oct;13(5):1070-1078. doi: 10.1055/a-1947-2674. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
7
A survey of internists' recommendations for aspirin in older adults and barriers to evidence-based use.内科医生对老年人使用阿司匹林的建议调查及基于证据的使用障碍。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2022 Nov;54(4):639-646. doi: 10.1007/s11239-022-02669-7. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
8
Oncologists' Attitudes Toward Cancer Care Affordability.肿瘤学家对癌症护理负担能力的态度。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e227863. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.7863.
9
Development and pilot testing of a conversation aid to support the evaluation of patients with thyroid nodules.甲状腺结节患者评估辅助会话工具的开发和初步测试。
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2022 Apr;96(4):627-636. doi: 10.1111/cen.14599. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
10
Pharmacologic, Dietary, and Psychological Treatments for Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation: Cost Utility Analysis.便秘型肠易激综合征的药物、饮食及心理治疗:成本效用分析
MDM Policy Pract. 2021 Jan 18;6(1):2381468320978417. doi: 10.1177/2381468320978417. eCollection 2021 Jan-Jun.