Texas A&M University, College Station, USA.
Hampton University, VA, USA.
Behav Modif. 2020 Sep;44(5):773-794. doi: 10.1177/0145445519846817. Epub 2019 May 7.
Social skills interventions are critical for promoting social, emotional, and behavioral competence for students with or at risk of emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD) and autism spectrum disorders (ASD). This single-case meta-analysis examined the effects of social skills interventions (SSIs) for students with EBD and ASD. Effect sizes were calculated for 78 cases across 25 included studies using a nonparametric effect size, Baseline Corrected Tau. The overall weighted mean effect size of 0.54 suggested a moderate effect across the 25 studies. The overall weighted mean effects for studies reporting maintenance and generalization data were 0.68 and 0.37, respectively. Potential moderators examined (disability, intervention design, intervention delivery, methodological quality) were not significant. As such, they did not moderate the outcomes for participants. We conducted a post hoc analysis and hypothesized that between-study differences may be more meaningful than the similarities shared by participants in the same moderator groups. Implications are discussed on using SSIs to address the social, emotional, and behavioral challenges of students with or at risk of EBD and ASD.
社交技能干预对于促进有或有情绪和行为障碍(EBD)和自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)风险的学生的社交、情感和行为能力至关重要。本单案例元分析考察了社交技能干预(SSI)对 EBD 和 ASD 学生的影响。使用非参数效应量 Baseline Corrected Tau,对 25 项纳入研究中的 78 个案例计算了效应量。25 项研究的综合加权平均效应量为 0.54,表明整体效应中等。报告维持和泛化数据的研究的综合加权平均效应量分别为 0.68 和 0.37。所检查的潜在调节因素(残疾、干预设计、干预提供、方法学质量)并不显著。因此,它们并没有调节参与者的结果。我们进行了事后分析,并假设研究之间的差异可能比同一调节组中参与者之间的相似性更有意义。讨论了使用 SSI 来解决有或有 EBD 和 ASD 风险的学生的社交、情感和行为挑战的问题。