• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氧化锆增强锂硅酸盐全瓷冠:厚度对存活率和失效模式的影响。

Zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate crowns: Effect of thickness on survival and failure mode.

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, University of Campinas - Piracicaba Dental School, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Universus Veritas UNG, Guarulhos, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Dent Mater. 2019 Jul;35(7):1007-1016. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.04.007. Epub 2019 May 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2019.04.007
PMID:31064670
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the reliability and failure mode of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS) molar crowns of different thicknesses.

METHODS

Monolithic ZLS molar crowns (0.5mm, 1.0mm, and 1.5 mm thickness) were modeled and milled using a CAD/CAM system (n = 21/group). Crowns were cemented on dentin-like epoxy resin replicas with a resin cement. The specimens were subjected to single load-to-failure test for step-stress profiles designing. Mouth-motion step-stress accelerated-life test was performed under water by sliding an indenter 0.7 mm lingually down on the distobuccal cusp until specimen fracture or suspension. Use level probability Weibull curves and reliability were calculated and plotted. Polarized-light optical microscope and scanning electron microscope (SEM) were used to characterize fracture patterns.

RESULTS

Irrespective of crown thickness, beta (β) values were higher than 1 and fatigue accelerated failures. While 0.5 mm ZLS crowns exhibited a significant reduction in the probability of survival at 200N, 300N and 400 N mission loads (69%, 41% and 19%, respectively), no significant difference was observed between 1.0 mm and 1.5 mm crowns. Both thicknesses have maintained the survivability at approximately 90%. Failure primarily comprised bulk fracture where radial cracks originated from the cementation surface beneath the indenter loading trail and propagated towards the cervical margin.

SIGNIFICANCE

1.5 mm- and 1.0 mm-thickness monolithic ZLS crowns presented higher probability of survival compared to 0.5 mm crowns. Bulk fracture was the chief failure mode, regardless of thickness.

摘要

目的

评估不同厚度氧化锆增强锂硅(ZLS)嵌体冠的可靠性和失效模式。

方法

使用 CAD/CAM 系统对整体式 ZLS 磨牙冠(0.5mm、1.0mm 和 1.5mm 厚度)进行建模和铣削(每组 n=21)。使用树脂水门汀将冠粘接到类似于牙本质的环氧树脂复制品上。根据步进应力轮廓设计,对试件进行单载荷失效试验。在水下通过将压头向颊侧方向滑动 0.7mm 于远颊尖,对试件进行口腔运动步进应力加速寿命试验,直到试件断裂或停止。使用水平概率威布尔曲线和可靠性进行计算和绘制。使用偏光显微镜和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)来表征断裂模式。

结果

无论冠厚度如何,β值均高于 1,且存在疲劳加速失效。当 0.5mm ZLS 冠在 200N、300N 和 400N 任务载荷下显著降低生存概率(分别为 69%、41%和 19%)时,1.0mm 和 1.5mm 冠之间未观察到显著差异。两种厚度均保持约 90%的生存能力。失效主要由体部断裂组成,其中径向裂纹从压头加载轨迹下方的粘结面开始,并向颈缘方向扩展。

意义

与 0.5mm 冠相比,1.5mm 和 1.0mm 厚的整体式 ZLS 冠具有更高的生存概率。无论厚度如何,体部断裂均为主要失效模式。

相似文献

1
Zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate crowns: Effect of thickness on survival and failure mode.氧化锆增强锂硅酸盐全瓷冠:厚度对存活率和失效模式的影响。
Dent Mater. 2019 Jul;35(7):1007-1016. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.04.007. Epub 2019 May 4.
2
Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Glass-Ceramics Versus Bilayered Zirconia-Based Restorations.整体式玻璃陶瓷与双层氧化锆基修复体的抗折裂性能比较。
J Prosthodont. 2019 Jan;28(1):e259-e264. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12684. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
3
Fracture load of ceramic restorations after fatigue loading.疲劳加载后陶瓷修复体的断裂载荷
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Aug;114(2):266-71. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.03.006. Epub 2015 May 16.
4
Fatigue resistance of CAD/CAM resin composite molar crowns.CAD/CAM树脂复合树脂磨牙冠的抗疲劳性能
Dent Mater. 2016 Apr;32(4):499-509. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.12.005. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
5
Fracture strength of lithium disilicate crowns compared to polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network and zirconia reinforced lithium silicate crowns.与聚合物渗透陶瓷网络冠和氧化锆增强硅酸锂冠相比,二硅酸锂冠的断裂强度。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017 Oct;74:342-348. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.06.025. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
6
Fracture analysis of monolithic CAD-CAM crowns.整体式 CAD-CAM 牙冠的断裂分析。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019 Jul;31(4):346-352. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12462. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
7
Ultrathin lithium disilicate and translucent zirconia crowns for posterior teeth: Survival and failure modes.用于后牙的超薄锂硅玻璃陶瓷和半透明氧化锆全瓷冠:存活率和失败模式。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2024 Feb;36(2):381-390. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13127. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
8
Load-bearing capacity and the recommended thickness of dental monolithic zirconia single crowns.牙科全瓷氧化锆单冠的承载能力及推荐厚度
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014 Jul;35:93-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.03.014. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
9
Fracture resistance of glazed, full-contour ZLS incisor crowns.全瓷贴面的ZLS前牙全冠的抗折性。
J Prosthodont Res. 2017 Jul;61(3):344-349. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2016.12.008. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
10
Probability of survival of implant-supported metal ceramic and CAD/CAM resin nanoceramic crowns.种植体支持的金属陶瓷和CAD/CAM树脂纳米陶瓷冠的存活概率。
Dent Mater. 2015 Aug;31(8):e168-77. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.05.006. Epub 2015 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Ceramic in Digital Dentistry: A Comprehensive Literature Review of Our Current Understanding.氧化锆增强锂硅陶瓷在数字化牙科中的应用:我们当前理解的综合文献回顾。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Dec 8;59(12):2135. doi: 10.3390/medicina59122135.
2
Reliability and Failure Mode of Ti-Base Abutments Supported by Narrow/Wide Implant Systems.窄/宽种植体系统支持的钛基基台的可靠性和失效模式。
Dent J (Basel). 2023 Aug 29;11(9):207. doi: 10.3390/dj11090207.
3
Fatigue behavior, failure mode, and stress distribution of occlusal veneers: influence of the prosthetic preparation cusp inclinations and the type of restorative material.
咬合贴面的疲劳行为、失效模式及应力分布:修复体预备牙尖倾斜度和修复材料类型的影响
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Sep;27(9):5539-5548. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05173-1. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
4
Reliability and lifetime of lithium disilicate, 3Y-TZP, and 5Y-TZP zirconia crowns with different occlusal thicknesses.不同咬合厚度的二硅酸锂、3Y-TZP和5Y-TZP氧化锆全冠的可靠性和使用寿命
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Jul;27(7):3827-3838. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05001-6. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
5
Silica infiltration on translucent zirconia restorations: Effects on the antagonist wear and survivability.透明氧化锆修复体表面的硅渗透:对(牙合)面磨损和存活率的影响。
Dent Mater. 2022 Dec;38(12):2084-2095. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2022.11.015. Epub 2022 Nov 26.
6
Flexural Strength of Vitreous Ceramics Based on Lithium Disilicate and Lithium Silicate Reinforced with Zirconia for CAD/CAM.基于二硅酸锂和硅酸锂并用氧化锆增强的用于计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造的玻璃陶瓷的抗弯强度
Int J Biomater. 2022 Feb 2;2022:5896511. doi: 10.1155/2022/5896511. eCollection 2022.
7
Does Resin Cement Type and Cement Preheating Influence the Marginal and Internal Fit of Lithium Disilicate Single Crowns?树脂水门汀类型和水门汀预热会影响二硅酸锂单冠的边缘适合性和内部适合性吗?
Materials (Basel). 2022 Jan 6;15(2):424. doi: 10.3390/ma15020424.
8
Biaxial Flexural Strength of High-Translucence Monolithic Ceramics upon Various Thicknesses.不同厚度下高透光性整体陶瓷的双轴弯曲强度。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2021 Oct 6;2021:4323914. doi: 10.1155/2021/4323914. eCollection 2021.
9
Does Preheating Resin Cements Affect Fracture Resistance of Lithium Disilicate and Zirconia Restorations?预热树脂水门汀会影响二硅酸锂和氧化锆修复体的抗折性吗?
Materials (Basel). 2021 Sep 27;14(19):5603. doi: 10.3390/ma14195603.
10
Prospective clinical evaluation of chairside-fabricated zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic partial crowns-5-year results.椅旁制作的氧化锆增强硅酸锂陶瓷部分冠的前瞻性临床评估——5年结果
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Feb;26(2):1593-1603. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04132-y. Epub 2021 Aug 20.