Akademikliniken, Storängsvägen 10, 11541, Stockholm, Sweden.
University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019 Oct;43(5):1400-1405. doi: 10.1007/s00266-019-01392-8. Epub 2019 May 7.
The visual nature of the Internet and its newer technologies makes it naturally aligned to plastic and aesthetic surgery. While many studies have looked at the use of social media ('SoMe'), they have been limited by either low response rate or limited scope. Our aim was to analyse a whole community of aesthetic plastic surgeons and their use of the Internet and social media platforms over a period of many years.
All active members of the Swedish national aesthetic plastic surgery society were identified. Webpages, professional (LinkedIn), social media (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram) and video-sharing (YouTube) accounts as well as online patient forum (Plastikoperationsforum) mentions of the surgeons and their clinics were identified, and corresponding platform-specific metrics were analysed.
Of the 85 active members, 67 (78.9%) had a webpage on one of the 34 different clinic websites. The websites of older established clinics had a significantly better Alexa ranking than newer ones. Surgeons with a profile on Facebook or Instagram were significantly younger than those without an account. Twitter was the least preferred social media platform. Each surgeon had a mean 12.8 threads per year as compared to a mean 34.3 threads per clinic per year.
Most of the new practices established by Swedish aesthetic plastic surgeons in the last 10 years are single-surgeon ones. Instagram and Facebook accounts of their clinics seem to be the most popular SoMe platforms. Younger surgeons were more likely to have a Facebook or Instagram account and to be using two or more social media platforms. These data provide information about all aesthetic plastic surgeons registered with the Swedish national body and their increasing use of SoMe.
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
互联网及其更新技术的视觉性质使其自然与整形和美容外科相关联。虽然有许多研究探讨了社交媒体(SoMe)的使用,但这些研究受到低回应率或有限范围的限制。我们的目的是分析一个完整的美容整形外科医生社区及其多年来对互联网和社交媒体平台的使用情况。
确定所有瑞典国家美容整形外科学会的活跃成员。识别外科医生及其诊所的网页、专业(LinkedIn)、社交媒体(Facebook、Twitter、Instagram)和视频共享(YouTube)账户以及在线患者论坛(Plastikoperationsforum)提及,并分析相应的平台特定指标。
在 85 名活跃成员中,有 67 名(78.9%)在 34 个不同诊所网站中的一个网站上拥有个人网页。历史更悠久的诊所网站的 Alexa 排名明显优于较新的网站。在 Facebook 或 Instagram 上有个人资料的外科医生比没有账户的外科医生更年轻。Twitter 是最不受欢迎的社交媒体平台。每位外科医生每年平均有 12.8 个帖子,而每个诊所每年平均有 34.3 个帖子。
在过去 10 年中,瑞典美容整形外科医生中建立的大多数新诊所都是单人诊所。他们诊所的 Instagram 和 Facebook 账户似乎是最受欢迎的社交媒体平台。更年轻的外科医生更有可能拥有 Facebook 或 Instagram 账户,并且更有可能使用两个或更多社交媒体平台。这些数据提供了有关瑞典国家机构注册的所有美容整形外科医生及其日益增加的社交媒体使用情况的信息。
证据等级 V:本杂志要求作者为每篇文章分配一个证据等级。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参考目录或在线作者指南 www.springer.com/00266 。