Suppr超能文献

一项关于英国(UK)整形外科医生在社交媒体上存在情况的横断面研究。

A cross-sectional study of the presence of United Kingdom (UK) plastic surgeons on social media.

机构信息

Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Castle Street, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014 Mar;67(3):362-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.12.015. Epub 2013 Dec 27.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS

To determine the uptake and usage of websites and social media (SM) by UK consultant (attending) plastic surgeons.

METHODS

Professional profiles of full BAPRAS members were searched on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, RealSelf, YouTube, ResearchGate in May 2013. Additional surgeons were identified from the follower lists of @BAPRASvoice and @BAAPSMedia. Website ownership was determined on Google. Searches were repeated three times. Dual BAAPS-BAPRAS members were identified from www.baaps.org.uk.

RESULTS

There were 156 (48.3%) dual BAAPS-BAPRAS members and 36 BAPRAS-only members. Fifty seven (18%) surgeons had no account on any platform whereas 266 (82%) were on at least one platform. One hundred and sixty four (51%) had personal websites whilst 37 (11%) had profiles on partnership websites. One hundred and sixteen (36%) had no website presence whilst 2% had websites under construction. The platform most surgeons use is LinkedIn (52%) whilst smaller proportions used Facebook (4%) and Twitter (22%). Surgeons had a mean of 126 (range: 0-3270) Twitter followers and 368 (range: 7-3786) fans/'likes' of their Facebook profiles. Time spent in postgraduate practice was not predictive of website ownership or SM use. However, dual BAAPS-BAPRAS members were significantly more likely to own a personal website, Twitter, RealSelf and YouTube accounts.

CONCLUSIONS

There has been an increase in the uptake of social media by UK plastic surgeons, especially in those with aesthetic surgery interests. However, very few surgeons have optimised their web presence. Continued education and appropriate usage guidance may promote uptake, particularly by reconstructive surgeons.

摘要

简介与目的

确定英国顾问(主治)整形外科医生对网站和社交媒体(SM)的使用情况。

方法

于 2013 年 5 月在 Facebook、Twitter、LinkedIn、RealSelf、YouTube、ResearchGate 上搜索英国整形外科医师协会(BAPRAS)的专业个人资料。从@BAPRASvoice 和 @BAAPSMedia 的关注者列表中,还确定了其他外科医生。通过谷歌确定网站的所有者。搜索重复了三次。从 www.baaps.org.uk 确定双重 BAAPS-BAPRAS 成员。

结果

有 156 名(48.3%)双重 BAAPS-BAPRAS 成员和 36 名仅 BAPRAS 成员。57 名(18%)外科医生在任何平台上均无账户,而 266 名(82%)至少在一个平台上有账户。164 名(51%)有个人网站,而 37 名(11%)有合作网站的个人资料。116 名(36%)没有网站存在,而 2%的网站正在建设中。外科医生使用最多的平台是 LinkedIn(52%),而 Facebook(4%)和 Twitter(22%)的使用比例较小。外科医生的平均 Twitter 关注者为 126 人(范围:0-3270),其 Facebook 个人资料的平均粉丝/点赞数为 368 人(范围:7-3786)。研究生实践时间的长短并不能预测网站所有权或社交媒体的使用情况。但是,双重 BAAPS-BAPRAS 成员更有可能拥有个人网站、Twitter、RealSelf 和 YouTube 账户。

结论

英国整形外科医生越来越多地使用社交媒体,特别是对美容手术感兴趣的外科医生。然而,很少有外科医生优化了他们的网络存在。继续教育和适当的使用指南可能会促进使用率的提高,特别是对重建外科医生而言。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验