• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高血压管理中的经济学:成本与质量的权衡。

Economics in hypertension management: cost and quality trade-offs.

作者信息

Stason W B

出版信息

J Hypertens Suppl. 1987 Feb;5(1):S55-9.

PMID:3106602
Abstract

Hypertension is a pervasive public health problem with enormous economic as well as medical consequences. Progress in developing more effective, safer and more convenient medications has been remarkable. Similarly, progress in focusing public and professional attention on hypertension has led to earlier treatment and undoubtedly contributed significantly to reduced stroke and cardiovascular mortality rates. Challenges in the next decade will be to resolve residual uncertainties about the balance of benefits and risk of treatment in mild diastolic hypertension and isolated systolic hypertension, and to develop incentives for maximizing the cost-effectiveness of treatment in those for whom treatment is, on balance, beneficial. Quality-of-life parameters will play prominent roles in clinical and policy decisions with respect to each of these challenges.

摘要

高血压是一个普遍存在的公共卫生问题,会产生巨大的经济和医学后果。在研发更有效、更安全、更便捷药物方面已取得显著进展。同样,在使公众和专业人士关注高血压方面所取得的进展促使了更早治疗,无疑对降低中风和心血管疾病死亡率做出了重大贡献。未来十年的挑战将是解决轻度舒张期高血压和单纯收缩期高血压治疗中效益与风险平衡方面尚存的不确定性,并制定激励措施,以在总体上治疗有益的人群中最大限度地提高治疗的成本效益。生活质量参数将在应对上述每一项挑战的临床和政策决策中发挥重要作用。

相似文献

1
Economics in hypertension management: cost and quality trade-offs.高血压管理中的经济学:成本与质量的权衡。
J Hypertens Suppl. 1987 Feb;5(1):S55-9.
2
Cost-effectiveness of losartan-based therapy in patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy: a UK-based economic evaluation of the Losartan Intervention for Endpoint reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study.氯沙坦治疗高血压合并左心室肥厚患者的成本效益:基于英国的氯沙坦干预降低高血压终点事件(LIFE)研究的经济学评估。
J Hum Hypertens. 2006 Jan;20(1):51-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001939.
3
An economic evaluation of a perindopril-based blood pressure lowering regimen for patients who have suffered a cerebrovascular event.针对发生过脑血管事件的患者,基于培哚普利的降压方案的经济学评估。
Eur J Health Econ. 2009 Feb;10(1):111-9. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0108-3. Epub 2008 Apr 30.
4
[Treatment of severe arterial hypertension: cost of drug prescriptions in accordance with ANAES guidelines].[重度动脉高血压的治疗:符合ANAES指南的药物处方费用]
Therapie. 2001 Mar-Apr;56(2):111-8.
5
Pharmacoeconomic challenges in disease management of hypertension.高血压疾病管理中的药物经济学挑战。
J Hypertens Suppl. 2001 Sep;19(3):S33-40.
6
Is the pharmacological treatment of mild to moderate hypertension cost effective in stroke prevention?轻度至中度高血压的药物治疗在预防中风方面是否具有成本效益?
N Z Med J. 1988 Apr 13;101(843):167-71.
7
Economics of hypertension control. World Hypertension League.高血压控制经济学。世界高血压联盟。
Bull World Health Organ. 1995;73(4):417-24.
8
Hypertension, a health economics perspective.高血压:健康经济学视角
Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2008 Jun;2(3):147-55. doi: 10.1177/1753944708090572.
9
The cost-effectiveness of methadone maintenance.美沙酮维持治疗的成本效益
Mt Sinai J Med. 2000 Oct-Nov;67(5-6):365-74.
10
Considerations regarding the cost and effectiveness of public and patient education programmes.
J Hum Hypertens. 1992 Dec;6(6):463-7.

引用本文的文献

1
The antihypertensive efficacy of losartan and amlodipine assessed with office and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Canadian Cozaar Hyzaar Amlodipine Trial Study Group.通过诊室和动态血压监测评估氯沙坦与氨氯地平的降压疗效。加拿大氯沙坦氢氯噻嗪氨氯地平试验研究组。
CMAJ. 1998 Sep 8;159(5):469-76.