Wilson T W, Lacourcière Y, Barnes C C
Department of Pharmacology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon.
CMAJ. 1998 Sep 8;159(5):469-76.
Losartan potassium is a recently marketed angiotensin II receptor antagonist. Previous studies have suggested that its full antihypertensive efficacy may be delayed for up to 12 weeks. The authors compared the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of losartan at 6 and 12 weeks with those of amlodipine besylate, a commonly used calcium antagonist.
This multicentre, randomized, double-blind clinical trial studied 302 patients with mild or moderate hypertension in 1995. Of the 302, 97 also underwent ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). After a 4-week placebo run-in period, the patients were randomly assigned to group A, B or C for 12 weeks. Those in groups A and B began treatment with losartan at 50mg/d, and those in group C began with amlodipine at 5 mg/d. If the blood pressure remained uncontrolled after 6 weeks, subjects in group A had their losartan dose doubled (to 100 mg/d), those in group B were given hydrochlorothiazide (12.5 mg/d) in addition to the losartan, which remained at 50 mg/d, and patients in group C had their amlodipine dose doubled (to 10 mg/d).
At 12 weeks all 3 regimens reduced office-recorded diastolic blood pressure (DBP) with the patient sitting. The mean reduction in group A was 8.7 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.3 to 10.1) (p < 0.001), in group B 12.5 mm Hg (95% CI 11.0 to 14.0) (p < 0.001) and in group C 12.9 mm Hg (95% CI 11.4 to 14.5) (p < 0.001). Losartan alone lowered sitting DBP to a lesser degree than the other 2 treatments (p < 0.01). In contrast, ABPM readings, whether 24-hour, daytime or nighttime, were not different among the regimens. Comparison of the results at 6 weeks yielded similar findings. Adverse effects were uncommon and were not different among the groups, with the exception of ankle edema, which was more frequent in group C.
Losartan alone reduces both office and ABPM readings. The observed changes in office-recorded sitting DBP suggest that losartan is less effective than amlodipine or the combination of losartan and hydrochlorothiazide, but ABPM did not confirm this difference. Perhaps changes in office readings measure different attributes of a drug than does ABPM.
氯沙坦钾是一种最近上市的血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂。先前的研究表明,其完全降压疗效可能会延迟长达12周。作者比较了氯沙坦在6周和12周时与常用钙拮抗剂苯磺酸氨氯地平的降压疗效和耐受性。
这项多中心、随机、双盲临床试验在1995年研究了302例轻度或中度高血压患者。在这302例患者中,97例还进行了动态血压监测(ABPM)。经过4周的安慰剂导入期后,患者被随机分为A、B或C组,为期12周。A组和B组患者开始以50mg/d的剂量服用氯沙坦,C组患者开始以5mg/d的剂量服用氨氯地平。如果6周后血压仍未得到控制,A组患者的氯沙坦剂量加倍(至100mg/d),B组患者除继续服用50mg/d的氯沙坦外,加用氢氯噻嗪(12.5mg/d),C组患者的氨氯地平剂量加倍(至10mg/d)。
在12周时,所有3种治疗方案均降低了患者坐位时的诊室记录舒张压(DBP)。A组的平均降低值为8.7mmHg(95%置信区间[CI]7.3至10.1)(p<0.001),B组为12.5mmHg(95%CI 11.0至14.0)(p<0.001),C组为12.9mmHg(95%CI 11.4至14.5)(p<0.001)。单独使用氯沙坦降低坐位DBP的程度低于其他两种治疗方法(p<0.01)。相比之下,各治疗方案的ABPM读数,无论是24小时、白天还是夜间,均无差异。6周时的结果比较也得出了类似的发现。不良反应不常见,各组之间无差异,但C组的踝部水肿更为常见。
单独使用氯沙坦可降低诊室和ABPM读数。诊室记录的坐位DBP的观察变化表明,氯沙坦的疗效不如氨氯地平或氯沙坦与氢氯噻嗪的联合用药,但ABPM未证实这种差异。也许诊室读数的变化所衡量的药物属性与ABPM不同。