• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The antihypertensive efficacy of losartan and amlodipine assessed with office and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Canadian Cozaar Hyzaar Amlodipine Trial Study Group.通过诊室和动态血压监测评估氯沙坦与氨氯地平的降压疗效。加拿大氯沙坦氢氯噻嗪氨氯地平试验研究组。
CMAJ. 1998 Sep 8;159(5):469-76.
2
An 18-week, prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of amlodipine/ramipril combination versus amlodipine monotherapy in the treatment of hypertension: the assessment of combination therapy of amlodipine/ramipril (ATAR) study.氨氯地平/雷米普利联合用药与氨氯地平单药治疗高血压的18周前瞻性随机双盲多中心研究:氨氯地平/雷米普利联合治疗评估(ATAR)研究
Clin Ther. 2008 Sep;30(9):1618-28. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.09.008.
3
Results of a phase III, 8-week, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial to assess the effects of amlodipine camsylate versus amlodipine besylate in Korean adults with mild to moderate hypertension.一项三期、为期8周、多中心、前瞻性、随机、双盲、平行组临床试验的结果,该试验旨在评估坎地沙坦酯与苯磺酸氨氯地平对韩国轻至中度高血压成年人的疗效。
Clin Ther. 2007 Sep;29(9):1924-36. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.09.018.
4
Efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy with valsartan plus hydrochlorothiazide compared with amlodipine monotherapy in hypertensive patients with other cardiovascular risk factors: the VAST study.缬沙坦联合氢氯噻嗪与氨氯地平单药治疗对伴有其他心血管危险因素的高血压患者的疗效及耐受性比较:VAST研究
Clin Ther. 2005 May;27(5):578-87. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.05.006.
5
Clinic blood pressure responses to two amlodipine salt formulations, adipate and besylate, in adult Korean patients with mild to moderate hypertension: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, 8-week comparison.韩国成年轻至中度高血压患者对两种氨氯地平盐制剂(己二酸盐和苯磺酸盐)的临床血压反应:一项多中心、随机、双盲、平行组、为期8周的比较研究。
Clin Ther. 2005 Jun;27(6):728-39. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.06.011.
6
Ambulatory monitoring of systolic hypertension in the elderly: Eprosartan/hydrochlorothiazide compared with losartan/hydrochlorothiazide (INSIST trial).老年人动态收缩期高血压监测:依普罗沙坦/氢氯噻嗪与氯沙坦/氢氯噻嗪的比较(INSIST 试验)。
Adv Ther. 2010 Jun;27(6):365-80. doi: 10.1007/s12325-010-0032-7. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
7
Comparison of the antihypertensive effects of the fixed dose combination enalapril 10 mg/nitrendipine 20 mg vs losartan 50 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg, assessed by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, in essential hypertensive patients.通过24小时动态血压监测评估依那普利10毫克/尼群地平20毫克固定剂量复方制剂与氯沙坦50毫克/氢氯噻嗪12.5毫克对原发性高血压患者的降压效果比较。
J Hum Hypertens. 2004 Mar;18(3):215-22. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001655.
8
Prospective and randomized study of the antihypertensive effect and tolerability of three antihypertensive agents, losartan, amlodipine, and lisinopril, in hypertensive patients.氯沙坦、氨氯地平和赖诺普利三种抗高血压药物对高血压患者降压效果及耐受性的前瞻性随机研究。
Heart Vessels. 2004 Jan;19(1):13-8. doi: 10.1007/s00380-003-0724-x.
9
Results of a multicenter, 8-week, parallel-group, randomized,double-blind, double-dummy, Phase III clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of amlodipine maleate versus amlodipine besylate in Korean patients with mild to moderate hypertension.一项多中心、为期8周的平行组、随机、双盲、双模拟III期临床试验的结果,该试验旨在评估马来酸氨氯地平与苯磺酸氨氯地平对韩国轻至中度高血压患者的疗效和耐受性。
Clin Ther. 2005 Apr;27(4):441-50. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.04.001.
10
Comparative efficacy and safety profile of amlodipine 5 mg/losartan 50 mg fixed-dose combination and amlodipine 10 mg monotherapy in hypertensive patients who respond poorly to amlodipine 5 mg monotherapy: an 8-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind phase III noninferiority study.在对氨氯地平 5 毫克单药治疗反应不佳的高血压患者中,氨氯地平 5 毫克/洛沙坦 50 毫克固定剂量复方与氨氯地平 10 毫克单药治疗的疗效和安全性比较:一项 8 周、多中心、随机、双盲、III 期非劣效性研究。
Clin Ther. 2011 Dec;33(12):1953-63. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.11.007. Epub 2011 Dec 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative effectiveness of a fixed-dose combination of losartan + HCTZ versus bisoprolol + HCTZ in patients with moderate-to-severe hypertension: results of the 6-month ELIZA trial.氯沙坦+氢氯噻嗪固定剂量复方制剂与比索洛尔+氢氯噻嗪治疗中重度高血压患者的疗效比较:6个月ELIZA试验结果
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2013;9:535-49. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S44568. Epub 2013 Sep 27.
2
Pharmacologic approaches for the management of symptoms and cardiovascular consequences of obstructive sleep apnea in adults.成人阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停症状和心血管后果的药物治疗方法。
Sleep Breath. 2010 Dec;14(4):307-15. doi: 10.1007/s11325-010-0383-y. Epub 2010 Jun 28.
3
Tautomerism in drug discovery.药物研发中的互变异构现象。
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2010 Jun;24(6-7):475-84. doi: 10.1007/s10822-010-9359-z. Epub 2010 May 20.
4
Losartan/Hydrochlorothiazide fixed combination versus amlodipine monotherapy in korean patients with mild to moderate hypertension.氯沙坦/氢氯噻嗪固定复方与氨氯地平单药治疗轻中度高血压韩国患者的比较。
Korean Circ J. 2009 Apr;39(4):151-6. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2009.39.4.151. Epub 2009 Apr 28.
5
Biomarkers related to aging in human populations.与人类群体衰老相关的生物标志物。
Adv Clin Chem. 2008;46:161-216. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2423(08)00405-8.
6
Chronobiologically explored effects of Telmisartan.替米沙坦的生物钟学研究效应
Clin Exp Hypertens. 2005 Feb-Apr;27(2-3):119-28. doi: 10.1081/ceh-200048733.
7
Amlodipine and losartan: reaction to comparison.氨氯地平和氯沙坦:对比反应
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2003 Nov-Dec;5(6):423-4; author reply 424. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2003.tb00003.x.
8
The effects of amlodipine compared to losartan in patients with mild to moderately severe hypertension.氨氯地平与氯沙坦对轻至中度高血压患者的疗效比较。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2003 Jan-Feb;5(1):17-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2003.01416.x.
9
Cost per millimeter of mercury lowering is a measure of economic value for antihypertensive agents.每降低一毫米汞柱的成本是衡量抗高血压药物经济价值的一个指标。
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2000 Dec;2(6):525-9. doi: 10.1007/s11906-996-0036-5.
10
Renal artery stenosis as a cause of renal impairment: implications for treatment of hypertension and congestive heart failure.肾动脉狭窄作为肾功能损害的一个原因:对高血压和充血性心力衰竭治疗的影响。
J R Soc Med. 1999 Oct;92(10):505-10. doi: 10.1177/014107689909201004.

本文引用的文献

1
Randomised trial of losartan versus captopril in patients over 65 with heart failure (Evaluation of Losartan in the Elderly Study, ELITE).氯沙坦与卡托普利治疗65岁以上心力衰竭患者的随机试验(老年氯沙坦评估研究,ELITE)
Lancet. 1997 Mar 15;349(9054):747-52. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)01187-2.
2
Efficacy, tolerability, and effects on quality of life of losartan, alone or with hydrochlorothiazide, versus amlodipine, alone or with hydrochlorothiazide, in patients with essential hypertension.氯沙坦单独或与氢氯噻嗪联用,与氨氯地平单独或与氢氯噻嗪联用相比,对原发性高血压患者的疗效、耐受性及生活质量的影响。
Clin Ther. 1996 Jul-Aug;18(4):608-25. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(96)80212-8.
3
Effect of amlodipine on morbidity and mortality in severe chronic heart failure. Prospective Randomized Amlodipine Survival Evaluation Study Group.氨氯地平对严重慢性心力衰竭患者发病率和死亡率的影响。前瞻性随机氨氯地平生存评估研究组。
N Engl J Med. 1996 Oct 10;335(15):1107-14. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199610103351504.
4
Losartan and low-dose hydrochlorothiazide in patients with essential hypertension. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of concomitant administration compared with individual components.氯沙坦与小剂量氢氯噻嗪治疗原发性高血压患者。一项比较联合用药与单一成分用药的双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Arch Intern Med. 1996 Feb 12;156(3):278-85.
5
Randomised, double-blind, parallel study of the anti-hypertensive efficacy and safety of losartan potassium compared with felodipine ER in elderly patients with mild to moderate hypertension.氯沙坦钾与非洛地平缓释片治疗老年轻、中度高血压的疗效及安全性对比的随机双盲平行研究
J Hum Hypertens. 1995 Sep;9(9):765-71.
6
Pharmacokinetics of losartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, and its active metabolite EXP3174 in humans.氯沙坦(一种血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂)及其活性代谢物EXP3174在人体内的药代动力学。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1995 Dec;58(6):641-9. doi: 10.1016/0009-9236(95)90020-9.
7
Report of the Canadian Hypertension Society Consensus Conference: 2. Diagnosis of hypertension in adults.加拿大高血压协会共识会议报告:2. 成人高血压的诊断
CMAJ. 1993 Aug 15;149(4):409-18.
8
Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study. Final results. Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study Research Group.轻度高血压治疗研究。最终结果。轻度高血压治疗研究组
JAMA. 1993 Aug 11;270(6):713-24.
9
An overview of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of amlodipine in elderly persons with systemic hypertension.氨氯地平在老年系统性高血压患者中的药代动力学和药效学概述。
Am J Cardiol. 1994 Jan 27;73(3):10A-17A. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(94)90269-0.
10
Blood pressure, antihypertensive drug treatment and the risks of stroke and of coronary heart disease.血压、抗高血压药物治疗与中风及冠心病风险
Br Med Bull. 1994 Apr;50(2):272-98. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a072892.

通过诊室和动态血压监测评估氯沙坦与氨氯地平的降压疗效。加拿大氯沙坦氢氯噻嗪氨氯地平试验研究组。

The antihypertensive efficacy of losartan and amlodipine assessed with office and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Canadian Cozaar Hyzaar Amlodipine Trial Study Group.

作者信息

Wilson T W, Lacourcière Y, Barnes C C

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon.

出版信息

CMAJ. 1998 Sep 8;159(5):469-76.

PMID:9757170
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1229641/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Losartan potassium is a recently marketed angiotensin II receptor antagonist. Previous studies have suggested that its full antihypertensive efficacy may be delayed for up to 12 weeks. The authors compared the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of losartan at 6 and 12 weeks with those of amlodipine besylate, a commonly used calcium antagonist.

METHODS

This multicentre, randomized, double-blind clinical trial studied 302 patients with mild or moderate hypertension in 1995. Of the 302, 97 also underwent ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). After a 4-week placebo run-in period, the patients were randomly assigned to group A, B or C for 12 weeks. Those in groups A and B began treatment with losartan at 50mg/d, and those in group C began with amlodipine at 5 mg/d. If the blood pressure remained uncontrolled after 6 weeks, subjects in group A had their losartan dose doubled (to 100 mg/d), those in group B were given hydrochlorothiazide (12.5 mg/d) in addition to the losartan, which remained at 50 mg/d, and patients in group C had their amlodipine dose doubled (to 10 mg/d).

RESULTS

At 12 weeks all 3 regimens reduced office-recorded diastolic blood pressure (DBP) with the patient sitting. The mean reduction in group A was 8.7 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.3 to 10.1) (p < 0.001), in group B 12.5 mm Hg (95% CI 11.0 to 14.0) (p < 0.001) and in group C 12.9 mm Hg (95% CI 11.4 to 14.5) (p < 0.001). Losartan alone lowered sitting DBP to a lesser degree than the other 2 treatments (p < 0.01). In contrast, ABPM readings, whether 24-hour, daytime or nighttime, were not different among the regimens. Comparison of the results at 6 weeks yielded similar findings. Adverse effects were uncommon and were not different among the groups, with the exception of ankle edema, which was more frequent in group C.

INTERPRETATION

Losartan alone reduces both office and ABPM readings. The observed changes in office-recorded sitting DBP suggest that losartan is less effective than amlodipine or the combination of losartan and hydrochlorothiazide, but ABPM did not confirm this difference. Perhaps changes in office readings measure different attributes of a drug than does ABPM.

摘要

背景

氯沙坦钾是一种最近上市的血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂。先前的研究表明,其完全降压疗效可能会延迟长达12周。作者比较了氯沙坦在6周和12周时与常用钙拮抗剂苯磺酸氨氯地平的降压疗效和耐受性。

方法

这项多中心、随机、双盲临床试验在1995年研究了302例轻度或中度高血压患者。在这302例患者中,97例还进行了动态血压监测(ABPM)。经过4周的安慰剂导入期后,患者被随机分为A、B或C组,为期12周。A组和B组患者开始以50mg/d的剂量服用氯沙坦,C组患者开始以5mg/d的剂量服用氨氯地平。如果6周后血压仍未得到控制,A组患者的氯沙坦剂量加倍(至100mg/d),B组患者除继续服用50mg/d的氯沙坦外,加用氢氯噻嗪(12.5mg/d),C组患者的氨氯地平剂量加倍(至10mg/d)。

结果

在12周时,所有3种治疗方案均降低了患者坐位时的诊室记录舒张压(DBP)。A组的平均降低值为8.7mmHg(95%置信区间[CI]7.3至10.1)(p<0.001),B组为12.5mmHg(95%CI 11.0至14.0)(p<0.001),C组为12.9mmHg(95%CI 11.4至14.5)(p<0.001)。单独使用氯沙坦降低坐位DBP的程度低于其他两种治疗方法(p<0.01)。相比之下,各治疗方案的ABPM读数,无论是24小时、白天还是夜间,均无差异。6周时的结果比较也得出了类似的发现。不良反应不常见,各组之间无差异,但C组的踝部水肿更为常见。

解读

单独使用氯沙坦可降低诊室和ABPM读数。诊室记录的坐位DBP的观察变化表明,氯沙坦的疗效不如氨氯地平或氯沙坦与氢氯噻嗪的联合用药,但ABPM未证实这种差异。也许诊室读数的变化所衡量的药物属性与ABPM不同。