1 School and Graduate Institute of Physical Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei.
2 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei.
Clin Rehabil. 2019 Sep;33(9):1419-1430. doi: 10.1177/0269215519846942. Epub 2019 May 8.
This study determined the clinical efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy and the predictors of its efficacy for knee osteoarthritis.
Electronic databases and search engines, namely MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library Database, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), China Academic Journals Full-text Database, and Google Scholar, were searched until 5 March 2019, for randomized controlled trials without restrictions on language and publication year.
Eligible trials and extracted data were identified by two independent investigators. The included articles were subjected to a meta-analysis and risk of bias assessment. Outcomes of interest included treatment success rate, pain, and physical function outcomes. A meta-regression analysis was performed to determine the predictors of treatment outcomes following shockwave therapy.
We included 50 trials (4844 patients) with a median (range) PEDro score of 6 (5-9). Meta-analyses results revealed an overall significant effect favoring shockwave therapy on the treatment success rate (odds ratio 3.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.21-4.69, < 0.00001; heterogeneity () = 62%), pain reduction (standardized mean difference (SMD) -2.02, 95% CI -2.38 to -1.67, < 0.00001; = 95%), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index function outcome (SMD -2.71, 95% CI -3.50 to -1.92, < 0.00001; = 97%). Follow-up duration and energy flux density were independent significant predictors of shockwave efficacy.
Shockwave therapy is beneficial for knee osteoarthritis. Shockwave dosage, particularly the energy level and intervention duration, may have different contributions to treatment efficacy.
本研究旨在确定体外冲击波治疗膝骨关节炎的临床疗效及其疗效的预测因素。
电子数据库和搜索引擎,即 MEDLINE、PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆数据库、物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro)、中国学术期刊全文数据库和 Google Scholar,截至 2019 年 3 月 5 日,对无语言和出版年限限制的随机对照试验进行了检索。
两名独立的调查人员确定了合格的试验和提取的数据。对纳入的文章进行了荟萃分析和偏倚风险评估。感兴趣的结局包括治疗成功率、疼痛和身体功能结局。进行了元回归分析,以确定冲击波治疗后治疗结局的预测因素。
我们纳入了 50 项试验(4844 例患者),PEDro 评分中位数(范围)为 6(5-9)。荟萃分析结果显示,冲击波治疗在总体治疗成功率方面具有显著优势(优势比 3.22,95%置信区间(CI)2.21-4.69,<0.00001;异质性()=62%))、疼痛减轻(标准化均数差值(SMD)-2.02,95%CI-2.38 至-1.67,<0.00001;=95%)和西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数功能结局(SMD-2.71,95%CI-3.50 至-1.92,<0.00001;=97%)。随访时间和能量通量密度是冲击波疗效的独立显著预测因素。
冲击波治疗对膝骨关节炎有益。冲击波剂量,特别是能量水平和干预持续时间,可能对治疗效果有不同的贡献。