Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
J Rehabil Med. 2022 Mar 29;54:jrm00266. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v54.2032.
Knee osteoarthritis is a leading cause of disability and medical costs. The effect of whole-body vibration in knee osteoarthritis is controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the effects and safety of whole-body vibration on pain, stiffness, physical function, and muscle strength in patients with knee osteoarthritis.
PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) and EMBASE databases were searched (date last accessed 1 April 2021) using the key words "vibration" and "knee osteoarthritis", to identify all randomized controlled trials related to whole-body vibration and knee osteoarthritis. Outcomes related to pain, stiffness, physical function, muscle strength, adverse events were included. The risk of bias and quality were assessed by the Cochrane Collaboration tool and PEDro scale. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. Subgroup analysis was performed for low- and high-frequency interventions.
A total of 14 randomized controlled trials involving 559 patients with knee osteoarthritis met the inclusion criteria. Nine studies were good-quality trials (PEDro score=6-8), and 5 studies were fairquality trials (PEDro score=4-5). Ten studies were included in the meta-analysis. One study showed negative effects of whole-body vibration on knee osteoarthritis. The duration of whole-body vibration ranged from 4 to 24 weeks. Meta-analysis revealed that whole-body vibration with strengthening exercises has a significant treatment effect on pain score (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.46 points, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 0.20-0.71, p = 0.0004), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC-function) (SMD = 0.51 points, 95% CI = 0.27-0.75, p < 0.0001), Timed Up and Go (TUG) test (SMD = 0.82 points, 95% CI = 0.46-1.18, p < 0.00001), extensor isokinetic peak torque (SMD = 0.65 points, 95% CI = 0.00-1.29, p = 0.05), peak power (SMD = 0.68 points, 95% CI = 0.26-1.10, p = 0.001), and extensor isometric strength (SMD = 0.44 points, 95% CI = 0.13-0.75, p = 0.006). Both low-frequency (10-30 Hz) and highfrequency (30-40 Hz) whole-body vibration were associated with significant changes in pain, physical function, and knee extensor strength (p < 0.05). WBV was not associated with significant changes in stiffness, balance ability, quality of life, and knee flexor strength. No adverse events were reported.
Meta-analysis showed that low-frequency and high-frequency whole-body vibration had additional positive effects compared with strengthening exercises alone on pain, knee extensor muscle strength, and physical function in individuals with knee OA. Whole-body vibration with strengthening exercises can be incorporated into treatment protocols.
膝骨关节炎是导致残疾和医疗费用的主要原因。全身振动对膝骨关节炎的影响仍存在争议。本研究旨在评估全身振动对膝骨关节炎患者疼痛、僵硬、身体功能和肌肉力量的影响和安全性。
检索 PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、Physiotherapy Evidence Database(PEDro)和 EMBASE 数据库(最后检索日期为 2021 年 4 月 1 日),使用“振动”和“膝骨关节炎”关键词,以确定所有与全身振动和膝骨关节炎相关的随机对照试验。纳入与疼痛、僵硬、身体功能、肌肉力量和不良事件相关的结局。使用 Cochrane 协作工具和 PEDro 量表评估偏倚和质量。进行系统评价和荟萃分析。对低频率和高频率干预进行亚组分析。
共纳入 14 项符合纳入标准的涉及 559 例膝骨关节炎患者的随机对照试验。9 项研究为高质量试验(PEDro 评分=6-8),5 项研究为中等质量试验(PEDro 评分=4-5)。10 项研究纳入荟萃分析。一项研究显示全身振动对膝骨关节炎有负面影响。全身振动的持续时间为 4 至 24 周。荟萃分析显示,全身振动联合强化运动对疼痛评分(标准化均数差(SMD)=0.46 分,95%置信区间(95%CI)=0.20-0.71,p=0.0004)、西部安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC 功能)(SMD=0.51 分,95%CI=0.27-0.75,p<0.0001)、计时起立行走测试(TUG)(SMD=0.82 分,95%CI=0.46-1.18,p<0.00001)、伸肌等速峰值扭矩(SMD=0.65 分,95%CI=0.00-1.29,p=0.05)、峰值功率(SMD=0.68 分,95%CI=0.26-1.10,p=0.001)和伸肌等长力量(SMD=0.44 分,95%CI=0.13-0.75,p=0.006)有显著改善。低频(10-30 Hz)和高频(30-40 Hz)全身振动均与疼痛、身体功能和伸膝肌力的显著变化相关(p<0.05)。全身振动与僵硬、平衡能力、生活质量和伸膝肌力的显著变化无关。未报告不良事件。
荟萃分析显示,与单独强化运动相比,低频和高频全身振动对膝骨关节炎患者的疼痛、伸膝肌力量和身体功能具有额外的积极影响。全身振动联合强化运动可纳入治疗方案。