• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会经济地位与老年癌症患者生存结局:基于全民健康保险服务-老年样本队列研究

Socioeconomic status and survival outcomes in elderly cancer patients: A national health insurance service-elderly sample cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.

Department of Radiation Oncology, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2019 Jul;8(7):3604-3613. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2231. Epub 2019 May 8.

DOI:10.1002/cam4.2231
PMID:31066516
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6601595/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We hypothesized that lower socioeconomic status (SES) was associated with higher all-cause mortality in patients newly diagnosed with cancer, particularly in the elderly population.

METHODS

We collected study patients from the stratified random sample of Korean National Health Insurance Elderly Cohort (2002-2015). The Cox's proportional hazards model was used to investigate the risk factors for mortality. Income level and composite deprivation index (CDI) 2010 were used to define the SES: low, intermediate, and high SES groups. The comorbidities were measured using Charlson Comorbidity Index score. After a wash-out period (2002), the final study population was 108 626 (2003-2015).

RESULTS

In multivariate analysis, low SES was associated with poor overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.05-1.12, P < 0.001) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.06-1.16, P < 0.001) particularly for patients aged 70-79 years. High SES was favorable prognostic factor of OS in patients aged 60-69 years (HR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.81-0.89, P < 0.001), 70-79 years (HR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.87-0.93, P < 0.001), and ≥80 years (HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.87-0.96, P < 0.001). However, SES was not associated with CSS in advanced age patients (≥80 years). Patients with low SES manifesting colorectal, urinary, liver, gastric, melanoma, and esophageal cancers demonstrated worse OS, compared to patients with intermediate SES. Also, low SES patients with urinary, liver, or colorectal cancers or melanoma demonstrated worse CSS compared to those with intermediate SES.

CONCLUSION

Low SES at the time of cancer diagnosis is associated with increased risk of OS and CSS in elderly patients. Depending on cancer sites, different patterns of OS and CSS were observed according to SES. Further elucidation of the causes underlying these phenomena is needed along with appropriate support for elderly cancer patients with low SES.

摘要

背景

我们假设较低的社会经济地位(SES)与新诊断癌症患者的全因死亡率相关,尤其是在老年人群中。

方法

我们从韩国国民健康保险老年队列的分层随机样本中收集研究患者(2002-2015 年)。使用 Cox 比例风险模型来研究死亡率的危险因素。收入水平和综合贫困指数(CDI)2010 用于定义 SES:低 SES、中 SES 和高 SES 组。使用 Charlson 合并症指数评分来测量合并症。在洗脱期(2002 年)后,最终研究人群为 108626 人(2003-2015 年)。

结果

在多变量分析中,低 SES 与较差的总生存(OS)(HR=1.08,95%CI:1.05-1.12,P<0.001)和癌症特异性生存(CSS)(HR=1.11,95%CI:1.06-1.16,P<0.001)相关,特别是对于 70-79 岁的患者。高 SES 是 60-69 岁(HR=0.85,95%CI:0.81-0.89,P<0.001)、70-79 岁(HR=0.90,95%CI:0.87-0.93,P<0.001)和≥80 岁(HR=0.91,95%CI:0.87-0.96,P<0.001)患者 OS 的有利预后因素。然而,SES 与高龄患者(≥80 岁)的 CSS 无关。与中 SES 患者相比,表现为结直肠癌、泌尿系统、肝脏、胃癌、黑色素瘤和食管癌的低 SES 患者 OS 更差。此外,与中 SES 患者相比,患有泌尿系统、肝脏或结直肠癌或黑色素瘤的低 SES 患者 CSS 更差。

结论

癌症诊断时的低 SES 与老年患者 OS 和 CSS 风险增加相关。根据癌症部位,SES 会导致不同的 OS 和 CSS 模式。需要进一步阐明这些现象的原因,并为 SES 较低的老年癌症患者提供适当的支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6b5/6601595/b8b7a40a22bd/CAM4-8-3604-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6b5/6601595/c8cd39c47198/CAM4-8-3604-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6b5/6601595/d78bed3bda64/CAM4-8-3604-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6b5/6601595/b8b7a40a22bd/CAM4-8-3604-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6b5/6601595/c8cd39c47198/CAM4-8-3604-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6b5/6601595/d78bed3bda64/CAM4-8-3604-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6b5/6601595/b8b7a40a22bd/CAM4-8-3604-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic status and survival outcomes in elderly cancer patients: A national health insurance service-elderly sample cohort study.社会经济地位与老年癌症患者生存结局:基于全民健康保险服务-老年样本队列研究
Cancer Med. 2019 Jul;8(7):3604-3613. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2231. Epub 2019 May 8.
2
Neighborhood and Individual Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Survival Among Patients With Nonmetastatic Common Cancers.社区和个体社会经济劣势与非转移性常见癌症患者的生存。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2139593. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.39593.
3
Disparities in socioeconomic status and neighborhood characteristics affect all-cause mortality in patients with newly diagnosed hypertension in Korea: a nationwide cohort study, 2002-2013.社会经济地位和社区特征差异对韩国新诊断高血压患者的全因死亡率有影响:一项2002 - 2013年的全国队列研究
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Jan 8;15:3. doi: 10.1186/s12939-015-0288-2.
4
The combined effect of individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status on cancer survival rates.个体和社区社会经济地位对癌症存活率的综合影响。
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e44325. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044325. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
5
Effects of individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status on the risk of all-cause mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A nationwide population-based cohort study, 2002-2013.个体及邻里社会经济地位对慢性阻塞性肺疾病全因死亡风险的影响:一项基于全国人口的队列研究,2002 - 2013年
Respir Med. 2016 May;114:9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2016.03.003. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
6
The impact of socioeconomic status on survival after cancer in the United States : findings from the National Program of Cancer Registries Patterns of Care Study.美国社会经济地位对癌症患者生存的影响:国家癌症登记项目照护模式研究的结果
Cancer. 2008 Aug 1;113(3):582-91. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23567.
7
Influence of low socioeconomic status on mortality in granulomatosis with polyangiitis.低社会经济地位对肉芽肿性多血管炎死亡率的影响。
Scand J Rheumatol. 2020 May;49(3):221-224. doi: 10.1080/03009742.2019.1707280. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
8
Patterns of overall mortality by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status in insured cancer patients in Southern California.南加州参保癌症患者的总体死亡率按种族/民族和社会经济地位的分布模式。
Cancer Causes Control. 2021 Jun;32(6):609-616. doi: 10.1007/s10552-021-01414-4. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
9
Disparities in cancer incidence and mortality by area-level socioeconomic status: a multilevel analysis.地区层面社会经济地位与癌症发病率和死亡率的差异:一项多层次分析
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015 Feb;69(2):168-76. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-204417. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
10
Impact of socioeconomic status on presentation, treatment and outcomes of patients with pancreatic cancer.社会经济地位对胰腺癌患者的临床表现、治疗和结局的影响。
J Comp Eff Res. 2020 Dec;9(17):1233-1241. doi: 10.2217/cer-2020-0079. Epub 2020 Dec 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Disparities in Survival Across Multiple Cancer Sites at Low-Income-Serving Hospitals.低收入服务医院多种癌症部位的生存差异。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 May 31. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17555-8.
2
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Multiple Myeloma: A Call to Action.多发性骨髓瘤中的多样性、公平性与包容性:行动呼吁。
J Adv Pract Oncol. 2024 Jul 22:1-14. doi: 10.6004/jadpro.2024.15.8.10.
3
Identifying predictors of COVID-related delays in cancer-specific medical care.识别与 COVID 相关的癌症特定医疗保健延迟的预测因素。

本文引用的文献

1
Charlson comorbidity index as a predictor of periodontal disease in elderly participants.Charlson合并症指数作为老年参与者牙周疾病的预测指标。
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2018 Apr 30;48(2):92-102. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2018.48.2.92. eCollection 2018 Apr.
2
Impact of socioeconomic status on survival for patients with anal cancer.社会经济地位对肛门癌患者生存的影响。
Cancer. 2018 Apr 15;124(8):1791-1797. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31186. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
3
Advancing the Science of Cancer Health Disparities Research.推动癌症健康差异研究的科学发展。
Cancer Med. 2024 Apr;13(8):e7183. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7183.
4
Racial disparities in the management and outcomes of primary osseous neoplasms of the spine: a SEER analysis.脊柱原发性骨肿瘤的管理和结果中的种族差异:SEER 分析。
J Neurooncol. 2024 Jan;166(2):293-301. doi: 10.1007/s11060-023-04557-3. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
5
Evaluation of the association of area-level socioeconomic deprivation and breast cancer recurrence by oestrogen receptor subtypes in Scotland.评估苏格兰地区社会经济剥夺程度与雌激素受体亚型乳腺癌复发之间的关联。
Breast Cancer Res. 2023 Oct 3;25(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s13058-023-01704-6.
6
Temporal Change in the Use of Laboratory and Imaging Tests in One Week Before Death, 2006-2015.2006-2015 年死亡前一周内实验室和影像学检查的使用时间变化。
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Mar 27;38(12):e98. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e98.
7
Socioeconomic and demographic determinants of radiation treatment and outcomes in glioblastoma patients.胶质母细胞瘤患者放疗及预后的社会经济和人口统计学决定因素
Front Neurol. 2022 Nov 11;13:1024138. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1024138. eCollection 2022.
8
Socioeconomic status-based survival disparities and nomogram prediction for patients with multiple myeloma: Results from American and Chinese populations.基于社会经济地位的多发性骨髓瘤患者生存差异及列线图预测:来自美国和中国人群的结果
Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 26;12:941714. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.941714. eCollection 2022.
9
Breast cancer incidence and survival in Scotland by socio-economic deprivation and tumour subtype.按社会经济剥夺程度和肿瘤亚型划分的苏格兰乳腺癌发病率和生存情况。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Jul;194(2):463-473. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06632-1. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
10
Living experiences of patients with advanced cancer with low socioeconomic status: protocol for a systematic review of qualitative evidence.低社会经济地位的晚期癌症患者的生活体验:系统评价定性证据的方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 1;12(2):e054606. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054606.
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jan 1;36(1):1-3. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.0496. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
4
Sociodemographic, socioeconomic, and clinical determinants of survival in patients with cancer: A systematic review of the literature focused on the elderly.癌症患者生存的社会人口学、社会经济学和临床决定因素:侧重于老年人的文献系统综述。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2018 Jan;9(1):6-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2017.07.007. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
5
Socioeconomic and Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Cancer Mortality, Incidence, and Survival in the United States, 1950-2014: Over Six Decades of Changing Patterns and Widening Inequalities.1950 - 2014年美国癌症死亡率、发病率及生存率的社会经济和种族/民族差异:六十多年来不断变化的模式与日益扩大的不平等
J Environ Public Health. 2017;2017:2819372. doi: 10.1155/2017/2819372. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
6
Relationships between social isolation, neighborhood poverty, and cancer mortality in a population-based study of US adults.一项基于美国成年人的人群研究中社会隔离、邻里贫困与癌症死亡率之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 8;12(3):e0173370. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173370. eCollection 2017.
7
Disparities in socioeconomic status and neighborhood characteristics affect all-cause mortality in patients with newly diagnosed hypertension in Korea: a nationwide cohort study, 2002-2013.社会经济地位和社区特征差异对韩国新诊断高血压患者的全因死亡率有影响:一项2002 - 2013年的全国队列研究
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Jan 8;15:3. doi: 10.1186/s12939-015-0288-2.
8
Prediction of cancer incidence and mortality in Korea, 2015.2015年韩国癌症发病率和死亡率预测
Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Apr;47(2):142-8. doi: 10.4143/crt.2015.066. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
9
Economic Burden of Cancer in Korea during 2000-2010.2000 - 2010年韩国癌症的经济负担
Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Jul;47(3):387-98. doi: 10.4143/crt.2014.001. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
10
International Society of Geriatric Oncology consensus on geriatric assessment in older patients with cancer.国际老年肿瘤学会关于老年癌症患者老年评估的共识
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Aug 20;32(24):2595-603. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.8347.