HIV Prevention Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Durban, South Africa.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Clinical Medicine, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu Natal, 719 Umbilo Road, Durban, 4051, South Africa.
BMC Womens Health. 2019 May 8;19(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12905-019-0761-y.
A high endogenous progesterone luteal state in the menstrual cycle has been independently associated with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) incidence in epidemiological studies. Hormonal contraception particularly high dose Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate (DMPA) is also thought to increase the risk of HIV acquisition. Inconsistent reports of this association have led us to hypothesize that unsuppressed endogenous progesterone level in women who reported hormonal contraception (HC) use may be an explanation for increased vulnerability to HIV.
This pilot study was a secondary cross-sectional analysis of data and laboratory testing of stored specimens collected from women who participated in the SAMRC HIV prevention MDP 301 trial during 2005-2009 in South Africa. Serum progesterone levels were measured in 39 women at the point of first positive HIV diagnosis during study follow-up and 36 women who remained HIV uninfected at the 52-week study exit visit.
Overall, the median (IQR) progesterone level in 49 women using hormonal contraception was 0.39 ng/ml (IQR 0.13-0.45) and 48 (97.9%) women had a progesterone level < 3.0 ng/ml suggestive of adequate progesterone suppression for contraceptive efficacy. After excluding the one woman with a progesterone level of > 3.0 ng/ml, the median progesterone level in women using DMPA remained marginally higher at 0.42 ng/ml (IQR 0.27-0.45) than women using Norethisterone Enanthate (NET-EN) (0.31 ng/ml; IQR 0.13-0.41, p = 0.061). For women using hormonal contraception, the median progesterone level did not differ between women with recent HIV infection or women who remained HIV negative (0.39 vs 0.38 ng/ml, p = 0.959). Similarly, the median progesterone level in women using DMPA or NET-EN did not differ by HIV status (0.43 vs 0.41 ng/ml, p = 0.905; 0.24 vs 0.31 ng/ml, p = 0.889).
Among women using hormonal contraception, DMPA or NET-EN we did not observe a significant difference in progesterone levels between women with recently acquired HIV infection and women who remained HIV negative. Our findings suggest that endogenous progesterone levels remain suppressed in the presence of hormonal contraception and are not likely to be associated with HIV acquisition.
在流行病学研究中,月经周期中高水平的内源性孕激素黄体状态与人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)的发病率独立相关。激素避孕,特别是高剂量的醋酸甲羟孕酮(DMPA),也被认为会增加 HIV 感染的风险。由于对这种关联的报告不一致,我们假设报告使用激素避孕的女性中未被抑制的内源性孕激素水平可能是 HIV 易感性增加的一个解释。
本研究是对 2005 年至 2009 年期间参加南非 SAMRC HIV 预防 MDP 301 试验的女性的储存标本进行数据和实验室检测的二次横断面分析。在研究随访期间首次 HIV 阳性诊断时,对 39 名女性进行了血清孕激素水平检测,在第 52 周研究结束时对 36 名仍未感染 HIV 的女性进行了检测。
总体而言,49 名使用激素避孕的女性的中位(IQR)孕激素水平为 0.39ng/ml(IQR 0.13-0.45),48 名(97.9%)女性的孕激素水平<3.0ng/ml,提示孕激素抑制水平足以达到避孕效果。排除一名孕激素水平>3.0ng/ml 的女性后,使用 DMPA 的女性的孕激素中位水平仍略高,为 0.42ng/ml(IQR 0.27-0.45),而使用炔诺孕酮庚酸酯(NET-EN)的女性为 0.31ng/ml(IQR 0.13-0.41,p=0.061)。对于使用激素避孕的女性,近期感染 HIV 的女性与仍为 HIV 阴性的女性的孕激素中位水平无差异(0.39 vs 0.38ng/ml,p=0.959)。同样,使用 DMPA 或 NET-EN 的女性的孕激素中位水平在 HIV 状态上无差异(0.43 vs 0.41ng/ml,p=0.905;0.24 vs 0.31ng/ml,p=0.889)。
在使用激素避孕的女性中,我们没有观察到近期感染 HIV 的女性与仍为 HIV 阴性的女性之间孕激素水平有显著差异。我们的研究结果表明,在使用激素避孕的情况下,内源性孕激素水平仍被抑制,与 HIV 感染无关。