Soylu Tulay G, Cuellar Alison E, Goldberg Debora G, Kuzel Anton J
Department of Health Administration and Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.
Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Oct;35(10):2882-2888. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05978-w. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
Little is known about what determines strategy implementation around quality improvement (QI) in small- and medium-sized practices. Key questions are whether QI strategies are associated with practice readiness and practice characteristics.
Grounded in organizational readiness theory, we examined how readiness and practice characteristics affect QI strategy implementation. The study was a component of a larger practice-level intervention, Heart of Virginia Healthcare, which sought to transform primary care while improving cardiovascular care.
This observational study analyzed practice correlates of QI strategy implementation in primary care at 3 and 12 months. Data were derived from surveys completed by clinicians and staff and from assessments by practice coaches.
A total of 175 small- and medium-sized primary care practices were included.
Outcome was QI strategy implementation in three domains: (1) aspirin, blood pressure, cholesterol, and smoking cessation (ABCS); (2) care coordination; and (3) organizational-level improvement. Coaches assessed implementation at 3 and 12 months. Readiness was measured by baseline member surveys, 1831 responses from 175 practices, a response rate of 73%. Practice survey assessed practice characteristics, a response rate of 93%. We used multivariate regression.
QI strategy implementation increased from 3 to 12 months: the mean for ABCS from 1.20 to 1.59, care coordination from 2.15 to 2.75, organizational improvement from 1.37 to 1.78 (95% CI). There was no statistically significant association between readiness and QI strategy implementation across domains. Independent practice implementation was statistically significantly higher than hospital-owned practices at 3 months for ABCS (95% CI, P = 0.01) and care coordination (95% CI, P = 0.03), and at 12 months for care coordination (95% CI, P = 0.04).
QI strategy implementation varies by practice ownership. Independent practices focus on patient care-related activities. FQHCs may need additional time to adopt and implement QI activities. Practice readiness may require more structural and organizational changes before starting a QI effort.
关于中小型医疗机构中质量改进(QI)策略实施的决定因素知之甚少。关键问题在于QI策略是否与机构准备情况及机构特征相关。
基于组织准备理论,我们研究了准备情况和机构特征如何影响QI策略的实施。该研究是规模更大的机构层面干预项目“弗吉尼亚医疗之心”的一部分,该项目旨在改善心血管护理的同时转变初级护理。
这项观察性研究分析了初级护理中QI策略实施在3个月和12个月时与机构的相关性。数据来源于临床医生和工作人员完成的调查以及机构教练的评估。
共纳入175家中小型初级护理机构。
结果是QI策略在三个领域的实施情况:(1)阿司匹林、血压、胆固醇和戒烟(ABCS);(2)护理协调;(3)机构层面的改进。教练在3个月和12个月时评估实施情况。准备情况通过基线成员调查进行测量,175家机构有1831份回复,回复率为73%。机构调查评估机构特征,回复率为93%。我们使用了多元回归分析。
QI策略的实施从3个月到12个月有所增加:ABCS的均值从1.20提高到1.59,护理协调从2.15提高到2.75,机构改进从1.37提高到1.78(95%置信区间)。各领域的准备情况与QI策略实施之间没有统计学上的显著关联。在3个月时,独立机构在ABCS(95%置信区间,P = 0.01)和护理协调(95%置信区间,P = 0.03)方面的实施情况在统计学上显著高于医院所属机构,在12个月时,护理协调方面(95%置信区间,P = 0.04)也是如此。
QI策略的实施因机构所有权而异。独立机构专注于与患者护理相关的活动。联邦合格健康中心(FQHCs)可能需要更多时间来采用和实施QI活动。在启动QI工作之前,机构准备可能需要更多的结构和组织变革。