护理疏忽调查的认知与初始心理测量测试：一种用于初级保健的新型患者安全工具。
Cognitive and Initial Psychometric Testing of the Errors of Care Omission Survey: A New Patient Safety Tool for Primary Care.
作者信息
Poghosyan Lusine, Norful Allison A, Liu Jianfang, Shaffer Jonathan
机构信息
Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY.
University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO.
出版信息
J Nurs Meas. 2019 Apr 1;27(1):16-32. doi: 10.1891/1061-3749.27.1.16.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Most patient safety studies focus on errors of commission rather than on errors of omission. No tools measure errors of omission in primary care. We developed the Errors of Care Omission Survey (ECOS) and present its cognitive and psychometric testing.
METHODS
Twenty-six primary care providers (PCPs) participated in cognitive interviews, which were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed. ECOS was also pilot tested with 37 PCPs. Item analysis and reliability testing w conducted.
RESULTS
Interviewees agreed that ECOS measures errors of omission and items were clear. The response categories were revised. All items were correlated and subscales had high internal consistency reliability.
CONCLUSIONS
ECOS can measure errors of omission in primary care.
摘要
背景与目的
大多数患者安全研究关注的是作为错误而非不作为错误。在初级保健中，尚无工具用于衡量不作为错误。我们开发了护理不作为错误调查（ECOS）并展示了其认知和心理测量测试。
方法
26名初级保健提供者（PCP）参与了认知访谈，访谈进行了录音、转录和分析。ECOS还在37名PCP中进行了预试验。进行了项目分析和信度测试。
结果
受访者一致认为ECOS可衡量不作为错误且项目清晰。对回答类别进行了修订。所有项目均具有相关性，且分量表具有较高的内部一致性信度。
结论
ECOS可测量初级保健中的不作为错误。
相似文献
1
Cognitive and Initial Psychometric Testing of the Errors of Care Omission Survey: A New Patient Safety Tool for Primary Care.护理疏忽调查的认知与初始心理测量测试：一种用于初级保健的新型患者安全工具。
J Nurs Meas. 2019 Apr 1;27(1):16-32. doi: 10.1891/1061-3749.27.1.16.
2
Psychometric Testing of Errors of Care Omission Survey: A New Tool on Patient Safety in Primary Care.疏忽错误关怀调查的心理测试：初级保健中患者安全的新工具。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Mar 1;17(2):e107-e114. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000575.
3
Primary Care Providers' Perspectives on Errors of Omission.初级医疗服务提供者对漏诊失误的看法。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2017 Nov-Dec;30(6):733-742. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.06.170161.
4
A revised MISSCARE survey: Results from pilot testing.改良的 MISSCARE 调查：初步测试结果。
Appl Nurs Res. 2019 Dec;50:151202. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2019.151202. Epub 2019 Oct 20.
5
Measuring nursing error: psychometrics of MISSCARE and practice and professional issues items.
J Nurs Meas. 2014;22(3):421-37. doi: 10.1891/1061-3749.22.3.421.
6
Measuring Patient Safety in Primary Care: The Development and Validation of the "Patient Reported Experiences and Outcomes of Safety in Primary Care" (PREOS-PC).初级保健中患者安全的测量：“初级保健患者报告的安全体验与结果”（PREOS-PC）的开发与验证
Ann Fam Med. 2016 May;14(3):253-61. doi: 10.1370/afm.1935.
7
The assessment of safe nursing care: development and psychometric evaluation.安全护理评估：开发与心理测量学评价
J Nurs Manag. 2017 Jan;25(1):22-36. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12424. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
8
Psychometric analysis of the scale for the predisposition to the occurrence of adverse events in nursing care provided in ICUs.
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2013 Feb;21(1):396-403. doi: 10.1590/s0104-11692013000100015.
9
Scale of adverse events associated to nursing practices: a psychometric study in Portuguese hospital context.与护理实践相关的不良事件量表：葡萄牙医院背景下的一项心理测量学研究。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2018 Nov 29;26:e3093. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.2595.3093.
10
Measuring safety culture in Dutch primary care: psychometric characteristics of the SCOPE-PC questionnaire.测量荷兰初级保健中的安全文化：SCOPE-PC 问卷的心理测量学特征。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Sep 17;13:354. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-354.
引用本文的文献
1
Protocol for evaluating quality and safety for the public through home care nursing in Italy: a multicentre cross-sectional descriptive observational study (AIDOMUS-IT).意大利通过家庭护理评估公众质量和安全的方案：一项多中心横断面描述性观察研究（AIDOMUS-IT）。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 18;13(5):e071155. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071155.
2
Psychometric Testing of Errors of Care Omission Survey: A New Tool on Patient Safety in Primary Care.疏忽错误关怀调查的心理测试：初级保健中患者安全的新工具。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Mar 1;17(2):e107-e114. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000575.
本文引用的文献
1
Primary Care Providers' Perspectives on Errors of Omission.初级医疗服务提供者对漏诊失误的看法。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2017 Nov-Dec;30(6):733-742. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.06.170161.
2
A Systematic Review of Patient Safety Measures in Adult Primary Care.成人初级保健中患者安全措施的系统评价
Am J Med Qual. 2017 May/Jun;32(3):237-245. doi: 10.1177/1062860616644328. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
3
How safe is primary care? A systematic review.初级保健有多安全？一项系统评价。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Jul;25(7):544-53. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004178. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
4
Missed nursing care is linked to patient satisfaction: a cross-sectional study of US hospitals.护理缺失与患者满意度相关：一项美国医院的横断面研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Jul;25(7):535-43. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-003961. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
5
Unfinished nursing care, missed care, and implicitly rationed care: State of the science review.未完护、遗漏护理和隐性配给护理：科学综述。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Jun;52(6):1121-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.02.012. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
6
The quality of hospital work environments and missed nursing care is linked to heart failure readmissions: a cross-sectional study of US hospitals.医院工作环境质量与护理缺失与心力衰竭再入院相关：一项美国医院的横断面研究
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Apr;24(4):255-63. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003346. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
7
Relationship between missed care and urinary tract infections in nursing homes.
Geriatr Nurs. 2015 Mar-Apr;36(2):126-30. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2014.12.009. Epub 2015 Jan 3.
8
The emerging primary care workforce: preliminary observations from the primary care team: learning from effective ambulatory practices project.新兴的初级保健劳动力：初级保健团队的初步观察：从有效的门诊实践项目中学习。
Acad Med. 2013 Dec;88(12):1830-4. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000027.
9
Organisational targets of patient safety improvement programs in primary care; an international web-based survey.基层医疗患者安全改善计划的组织目标；一项国际网络调查。
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Oct 1;14:145. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-145.
10
25-Year summary of US malpractice claims for diagnostic errors 1986-2010: an analysis from the National Practitioner Data Bank.1986-2010 年美国医疗事故索赔中诊断错误的 25 年总结：国家从业者数据库分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Aug;22(8):672-80. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001550. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
Zotero 插件