Poghosyan Lusine, Norful Allison A, Liu Jianfang, Shaffer Jonathan
Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY.
University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO.
J Nurs Meas. 2019 Apr 1;27(1):16-32. doi: 10.1891/1061-3749.27.1.16.
Most patient safety studies focus on errors of commission rather than on errors of omission. No tools measure errors of omission in primary care. We developed the Errors of Care Omission Survey (ECOS) and present its cognitive and psychometric testing.
Twenty-six primary care providers (PCPs) participated in cognitive interviews, which were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed. ECOS was also pilot tested with 37 PCPs. Item analysis and reliability testing w conducted.
Interviewees agreed that ECOS measures errors of omission and items were clear. The response categories were revised. All items were correlated and subscales had high internal consistency reliability.
ECOS can measure errors of omission in primary care.
大多数患者安全研究关注的是作为错误而非不作为错误。在初级保健中，尚无工具用于衡量不作为错误。我们开发了护理不作为错误调查（ECOS）并展示了其认知和心理测量测试。
26名初级保健提供者（PCP）参与了认知访谈，访谈进行了录音、转录和分析。ECOS还在37名PCP中进行了预试验。进行了项目分析和信度测试。
受访者一致认为ECOS可衡量不作为错误且项目清晰。对回答类别进行了修订。所有项目均具有相关性，且分量表具有较高的内部一致性信度。
ECOS可测量初级保健中的不作为错误。
