Carthon J Margo Brooks, Lasater Karen B, Sloane Douglas M, Kutney-Lee Ann
Center for Health Outcomes & Policy Research, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Apr;24(4):255-63. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003346. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
Threats to quality and patient safety may exist when necessary nursing care is omitted. Empirical research is needed to determine how missed nursing care is associated with patient outcomes.
The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between missed nursing care and hospital readmissions.
Cross-sectional examination, using three linked data sources-(1) nurse survey, (2) patient discharge data from three states (California, New Jersey and Pennsylvania) and (3) administrative hospital data- from 2005 to 2006. We explored the incidence of 30-day readmission for 160 930 patients with heart failure in 419 acute care hospitals in the USA. Logistic regression was used to assess the effect of missed care on the odds of readmission, adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics.
The most frequently missed nursing care activities across all hospitals in our sample included talking to and comforting patients (42.0%), developing and updating care plans (35.8%) and educating patients and families (31.5%). For 4 of the 10 studied care activities, each 10 percentage-point increase in the number of nurses reporting having missed the activity was associated with an increase in the odds of readmission by 2-8% after adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics. However, missed nursing care was no longer a significant predictor of readmission once adjusting for the nurse work environment, except in the case of the delivery of treatments and procedures (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.14).
Missed care is an independent predictor of heart failure readmissions. However, once adjusting for the quality of the nurse work environment, this relationship is attenuated. Improvements in nurses' working conditions may be one strategy to reduce care omissions and improve patient outcomes.
当必要的护理缺失时,可能会对护理质量和患者安全构成威胁。需要进行实证研究来确定漏护与患者预后之间的关联。
本研究旨在探讨漏护与医院再入院之间的关系。
采用横断面研究方法,使用三个相互关联的数据源——(1)护士调查,(2)来自三个州(加利福尼亚州、新泽西州和宾夕法尼亚州)的患者出院数据,以及(3)2005年至2006年的医院行政数据。我们在美国419家急性护理医院中,对160930例心力衰竭患者的30天再入院发生率进行了探究。采用逻辑回归分析来评估漏护对再入院几率的影响,并对患者和医院特征进行了校正。
在我们样本中的所有医院里,最常被漏做的护理活动包括与患者交谈和安慰患者(42.0%)、制定和更新护理计划(35.8%)以及对患者及其家属进行教育(31.5%)。在所研究的10项护理活动中,有4项活动,在对患者和医院特征进行校正后,报告漏做该活动的护士人数每增加10个百分点,再入院几率就会增加2%至8%。然而,在校正护士工作环境后,漏护不再是再入院的显著预测因素,但提供治疗和操作除外(比值比1.08,95%置信区间1.02至1.14)。
漏护是心力衰竭再入院的独立预测因素。然而,在校正护士工作环境质量后,这种关系会减弱。改善护士的工作条件可能是减少护理疏漏和改善患者预后的一种策略。