France C P, Woods J H
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1987;91(2):213-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00217065.
Antagonistic actions of the irreversible, mu-selective antagonist beta-funaltrexamine (beta-FNA) were evaluated in pigeons trained to discriminate among intramuscular injections of morphine (5.6 mg/kg), saline, and naltrexone (10.0 mg/kg). Beta-FNA administered alone (1.0 or 10.0 mg/kg) failed to mimic the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine or naltrexone. Beta-FNA attenuated the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine. A three-fold larger dose of morphine was required for complete generalization when pigeons were pretreated with a dose of 1.0 mg/kg beta-FNA. A dose of 10.0 mg/kg beta-FNA completely antagonized the morphine discriminative stimulus, so that pigeons responded predominantly on the saline key up to doses of morphine that suppressed responding. Doses of beta-FNA that attenuated the effects of morphine had no effect on the discriminative stimulus effects of naltrexone. These results demonstrate that, like naltrexone, beta-FNA attenuates the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine in pigeons and, at sufficiently large doses, antagonizes morphine in an unsurmountable manner. Beta-FNA does not, however, share discriminative stimulus properties with naltrexone in these pigeons, and fails to attenuate the discriminative stimulus effects of naltrexone, lending support to the suggestion that naltrexone exerts discriminative stimulus effects under these experimental conditions predominantly by a non-mu opioid mechanism.
在经训练可区分肌肉注射吗啡(5.6毫克/千克)、生理盐水和纳曲酮(10.0毫克/千克)的鸽子中,评估了不可逆的μ-选择性拮抗剂β-芬太尼环丙基甲基酮(β-FNA)的拮抗作用。单独给予β-FNA(1.0或10.0毫克/千克)未能模拟吗啡或纳曲酮的辨别刺激效应。β-FNA减弱了吗啡的辨别刺激效应。当鸽子用1.0毫克/千克的β-FNA预处理时,需要大三倍剂量的吗啡才能实现完全泛化。10.0毫克/千克的β-FNA完全拮抗了吗啡的辨别刺激,因此在抑制反应的吗啡剂量范围内,鸽子主要在生理盐水按键上做出反应。减弱吗啡效应的β-FNA剂量对纳曲酮的辨别刺激效应没有影响。这些结果表明,与纳曲酮一样,β-FNA减弱了鸽子中吗啡的辨别刺激效应,并且在足够大的剂量下,以不可克服的方式拮抗吗啡。然而,在这些鸽子中,β-FNA与纳曲酮不具有共同的辨别刺激特性,并且未能减弱纳曲酮的辨别刺激效应,这支持了纳曲酮在这些实验条件下主要通过非μ阿片类机制发挥辨别刺激效应的观点。