• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
An International Collaborative Standardizing Patient-Centered Outcome Measures in Pediatric Facial Palsy.国际协作标准化小儿面神经麻痹患者中心结局测量。
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2019 Sep 1;21(5):351-358. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0224.
2
An International Collaborative Standardizing a Comprehensive Patient-Centered Outcomes Measurement Set for Colorectal Cancer.国际协作标准化全面以患者为中心的结直肠癌结局测量集。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 May 1;3(5):686-694. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0417.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Development of an international standard set of patient-centred outcome measures for overall paediatric health: a consensus process.制定一套以患者为中心的国际通用儿童健康结局指标集:共识过程。
Arch Dis Child. 2021 Sep;106(9):868-876. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-320345. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
5
International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM): Standardized Patient-Centered Outcomes Measurement Set for Heart Failure Patients.国际健康结果测量联合会(ICHOM):心力衰竭患者以患者为中心的标准化结局测量集。
JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Mar;8(3):212-222. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.09.007. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
6
Photographic Standards for Patients With Facial Palsy and Recommendations by Members of the Sir Charles Bell Society.面部麻痹患者的摄影标准及查尔斯·贝尔爵士协会成员的建议
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017 Jul 1;19(4):275-281. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2016.1883.
7
Development of an International Standard Set of Value-Based Outcome Measures for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Report of the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) CKD Working Group.开发一套基于价值的国际慢性肾脏病患者结局测量标准集:国际健康结局测量联盟(ICHOM)慢性肾脏病工作组的报告。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2019 Mar;73(3):372-384. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.10.007. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
8
Development of an international standard set of clinical and patient-reported outcomes for children and adults with congenital heart disease: a report from the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement Congenital Heart Disease Working Group.先天性心脏病儿童和成人临床及患者报告结局国际标准集的制定:国际健康结局测量联盟先天性心脏病工作组报告
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2021 Jul 21;7(4):354-365. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab009.
9
A Standard Set of Value-Based Patient-Centered Outcomes for Breast Cancer: The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) Initiative.基于价值的乳腺癌患者为中心的结局标准集:国际健康结果测量联合会(ICHOM)倡议。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 May 1;3(5):677-685. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.4851.
10
Development of an updated, standardized, patient-centered outcome set for lung cancer.开发一个更新的、标准化的、以患者为中心的肺癌结局集。
Lung Cancer. 2022 Nov;173:5-13. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.08.021. Epub 2022 Sep 5.

引用本文的文献

1
[The assessment of facial nerve function].[面神经功能评估]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 May;38(5):359-363. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2024.05.001.
2
Introducing standard patient-reported measures (PRMs) into routine maternity care: A pre-implementation qualitative study on women's perspectives in Finland.将标准化患者报告结局(PROs)引入常规产科护理:芬兰妇女视角的实施前定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug 10;23(1):845. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09818-5.
3
Identifying common health indicators from paediatric core outcome sets: a systematic review with narrative synthesis using the WHO International Classification of Functioning, Health and Disability.从儿科核心结局集合中识别常见健康指标:使用世界卫生组织国际功能、残疾和健康分类进行系统评价和叙述性综合。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2022 Oct;6(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2022-001537.
4
Physical therapy for facial nerve paralysis (Bell's palsy): An updated and extended systematic review of the evidence for facial exercise therapy.物理疗法治疗面神经麻痹(贝尔麻痹):面部运动疗法证据的更新和扩展系统评价。
Clin Rehabil. 2022 Nov;36(11):1424-1449. doi: 10.1177/02692155221110727. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
5
Common patient-reported outcomes across ICHOM Standard Sets: the potential contribution of PROMIS®.ICHOM 标准集中常见的患者报告结局: PROMIS® 的潜在贡献。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Sep 6;21(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01624-5.
6
Systematic review of international Delphi surveys for core outcome set development: representation of international patients.系统评价国际德尔菲调查在核心结局集制定中的应用:国际患者的代表性。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 23;10(11):e040223. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040223.
7
Raising the Digital Profile of Facial Palsy: National Surveys of Patients' and Clinicians' Experiences of Changing UK Treatment Pathways and Views on the Future Role of Digital Technology.提升面瘫的数字形象:关于英国患者和临床医生对治疗途径变化的体验以及对数字技术未来作用看法的全国性调查
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 5;22(10):e20406. doi: 10.2196/20406.
8
Infectious causes of peripheral facial nerve palsy in children-a retrospective cohort study with long-term follow-up.儿童周围性面神经麻痹的感染性病因:一项具有长期随访的回顾性队列研究。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Nov;38(11):2177-2184. doi: 10.1007/s10096-019-03660-6. Epub 2019 Aug 1.

本文引用的文献

1
An International Collaborative Standardizing a Comprehensive Patient-Centered Outcomes Measurement Set for Colorectal Cancer.国际协作标准化全面以患者为中心的结直肠癌结局测量集。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 May 1;3(5):686-694. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0417.
2
Worldwide Testing of the eFACE Facial Nerve Clinician-Graded Scale.eFACE面神经临床医生分级量表的全球测试。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Feb;139(2):491e-498e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002954.
3
A Standard Set of Value-Based Patient-Centered Outcomes for Breast Cancer: The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) Initiative.基于价值的乳腺癌患者为中心的结局标准集:国际健康结果测量联合会(ICHOM)倡议。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 May 1;3(5):677-685. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.4851.
4
Test-Retest Reliability and Agreement Between In-Person and Video Assessment of Facial Mimetic Function Using the eFACE Facial Grading System.使用eFACE面部评分系统对面部表情功能进行面对面评估与视频评估之间的重测信度及一致性
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017 May 1;19(3):206-211. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2016.1620.
5
Content Validity of Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments used with Pediatric Patients with Facial Differences: A Systematic Review.用于面部差异儿科患者的患者报告结局工具的内容效度:一项系统评价。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018 Aug;55(7):989-998. doi: 10.1597/16-148. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
6
How to Pay for Health Care.如何支付医疗费用。
Harv Bus Rev. 2016 Jul-Aug;94(7-8):88-98, 100, 134.
7
Symptom Monitoring With Patient-Reported Outcomes During Routine Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.常规癌症治疗期间通过患者报告结局进行症状监测:一项随机对照试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb 20;34(6):557-65. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.0830. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
8
An International Standard Set of Patient-Centered Outcome Measures After Stroke.一套国际标准的卒中后以患者为中心的结局指标
Stroke. 2016 Jan;47(1):180-6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010898. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
9
Longitudinal evaluation of patient-reported outcomes measurement information systems measures in pediatric chronic pain.儿科慢性疼痛患者报告结局测量信息系统指标的纵向评估
Pain. 2016 Feb;157(2):339-347. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000378.
10
Concurrent validity of the PROMIS® pediatric global health measure.患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS®)儿科总体健康指标的同时效度
Qual Life Res. 2016 Mar;25(3):739-51. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1111-7. Epub 2015 Aug 27.

国际协作标准化小儿面神经麻痹患者中心结局测量。

An International Collaborative Standardizing Patient-Centered Outcome Measures in Pediatric Facial Palsy.

机构信息

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

Director of Standardisation and Latin America, International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement, Mexico City, Mexico.

出版信息

JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2019 Sep 1;21(5):351-358. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0224.

DOI:10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0224
PMID:
31070677
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6512270/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Standardization of outcome measurement using a patient-centered approach in pediatric facial palsy may help aid the advancement of clinical care in this population.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a standardized outcome measurement set for pediatric patients with facial palsy through an international multidisciplinary group of health care professionals, researchers, and patients and patient representatives.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A working group of health care experts and patient representatives (n = 21), along with external reviewers, participated in the study. Seven teleconferences were conducted over a 9-month period between December 3, 2016, and September 23, 2017, under the guidance of the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement, each followed with a 2-round Delphi process to develop consensus. This process defined the scope, outcome domains, measurement tools, time points for measurements, and case-mix variables deemed essential to a standardized outcome measurement set. Each teleconference was informed by a comprehensive review of literature and through communication with patient advisory groups. Literature review of PubMed was conducted for research published between January 1, 1981, and November 30, 2016.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The study aim was to develop the outcomes and measures relevant to children with facial palsy as opposed to studying the effect of a particular intervention.

RESULTS

The 21 members of the working group included pediatric facial palsy experts from 9 countries. The literature review identified 1628 papers, of which 395 (24.3%) were screened and 83 (5.1%) were included for qualitative evaluation. A standard set of outcome measurements was designed by the working group to allow the recording of outcomes after all forms of surgical and nonsurgical facial palsy treatments among pediatric patients of all ages. Unilateral or bilateral, congenital or acquired, permanent or temporary, and single-territory or multiterritory facial palsy can be evaluated using this standard set. Functional, appearance, psychosocial, and administrative outcomes were selected for inclusion. Clinimetric and psychometric outcome measurement tools (clinician-, patient-, and patient proxy-reported) and time points for measuring patient outcomes were established. Eighty-six independent reviews of the standard set were completed, and 34 (85%) of the 40 patients and patient representatives and 44 (96%) of the 46 health care professionals who participated in the reviews agreed that the standard set would capture the outcomes that matter most to children with facial palsy.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This international collaborative study produced a free standardized set of outcome measures for evaluating the quality of care provided to pediatric patients with facial palsy, allowing benchmarking of clinicians, comparison of treatment pathways, and introduction of value-based reimbursement strategies in the field of pediatric facial palsy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA.

摘要

重要性

采用以患者为中心的方法对儿科面瘫患者的结局进行标准化测量,可能有助于促进该人群的临床护理进展。

目的

通过国际多学科医疗保健专业人员、研究人员和患者及患者代表组成的工作组,为患有面瘫的儿科患者制定标准化的结局测量集。

设计、地点和参与者:21 名医疗保健专家和患者代表(n=21)以及外部审查员参加了这项研究。在国际健康结果测量联合会的指导下,于 2016 年 12 月 3 日至 2017 年 9 月 23 日期间进行了 7 次电话会议,随后进行了 2 轮 Delphi 流程以达成共识。该过程定义了范围、结局领域、测量工具、测量时间点以及被认为对标准化结局测量集至关重要的病例组合变量。每次电话会议都参考了文献的全面回顾,并通过与患者咨询小组进行沟通。对 1981 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 11 月 30 日期间发表的文献进行了 PubMed 文献综述。

主要结局和测量指标

该研究的目的是制定与面瘫儿童相关的结局和测量指标,而不是研究特定干预措施的效果。

结果

工作组的 21 名成员包括来自 9 个国家的儿科面瘫专家。文献综述共确定了 1628 篇论文,其中筛选了 395 篇(24.3%),并对 83 篇(5.1%)进行了定性评估。工作组设计了一套标准的测量方法,允许记录所有年龄段儿科患者接受各种手术和非手术面瘫治疗后的结局。单侧或双侧、先天性或后天性、永久性或暂时性、单部位或多部位面瘫均可使用该标准集进行评估。选择了功能、外观、心理社会和行政结局纳入标准。建立了临床计量和心理计量结局测量工具(临床医生、患者和患者代表报告)以及测量患者结局的时间点。完成了 86 次对标准集的独立评估,40 名患者和患者代表中的 34 名(85%)和 46 名参与评估的医疗保健专业人员中的 44 名(96%)同意该标准集将捕捉到面瘫儿童最重要的结局。

结论和相关性

这项国际合作研究产生了一套免费的标准化结局测量集,用于评估为面瘫儿科患者提供的护理质量,允许对临床医生进行基准测试、比较治疗途径,并在儿科面瘫领域引入基于价值的报销策略。

证据水平

无。