Larsen Rasmus Tolstrup, Christensen Jan, Juhl Carsten Bogh, Andersen Henning Boje, Langberg Henning
1CopenRehab, Department of Public Health, Section of Social Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Gothersgade 160, 3rd floor, 1123 Copenhagen K, Denmark.
2Department of Occupational- and Physiotherapy, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2019 May 4;16:7. doi: 10.1186/s11556-019-0213-6. eCollection 2019.
The body of evidence related to the effect of physical activity monitor-based interventions has grown over the recent years. However, the effect of physical activity monitor-based interventions in older adults remains unclear and should be systematically reviewed.
The objective of this systematic review was to estimate the effect of physical activity monitor-based interventions on physical activity behavior in participants aged 65 and above. Subsequently we explored the effect on body mass index, physical capacity, and health-related quality of life and finally the impact of patient- and intervention characteristics.
Searches in MEDLINE, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, and CENTRAL were performed on April 26, 2018. No publication date filters were applied. References of eligible studies were scrutinized and relevant journals were hand-searched. Randomized controlled trials and randomized cross-over trials investigating the effect of a physical activity monitor-based intervention on physical activity were included. Studies were included if the mean age of the participants was above 65 years, and participants could walk independently with or without walking aids. The Cochrane handbook was used as a template for extracting data and the RoB 2.0 tool was used to assess risk of bias. Random-effects meta-analysis using Hedges g, were used to pool the study results. The main outcome of this study was physical activity.
Twenty-one studies with 2783 participants were included. The median participant age in the studies was 70.5 years, the median percentage of male participants was 42%, and the median baseline daily step count was 5268. Physical activity monitor-based interventions had a moderate effect (SMD = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.73) compared to control interventions, corresponding to an average increase of 1297 steps per day in the intervention groups. No impact of patient and intervention characteristics on the effect estimates were found.
Low quality of evidence was found for a moderate effect of physical activity monitor-based interventions on physical activity compared with control interventions. More studies with higher research methodology standards are required.
CRD42018083648.
近年来,与基于身体活动监测器的干预措施效果相关的证据越来越多。然而,基于身体活动监测器的干预措施对老年人的效果仍不明确,应进行系统评价。
本系统评价的目的是评估基于身体活动监测器的干预措施对65岁及以上参与者身体活动行为的影响。随后,我们探讨了其对体重指数、身体能力和健康相关生活质量的影响,最后分析了患者及干预特征的影响。
于2018年4月26日在MEDLINE、EMBASE、SPORTDiscus、CINAHL和CENTRAL数据库进行检索。未应用出版日期筛选条件。对符合条件的研究的参考文献进行了仔细审查,并对手检相关期刊。纳入调查基于身体活动监测器的干预措施对身体活动影响的随机对照试验和随机交叉试验。如果参与者的平均年龄在65岁以上,且参与者无论是否使用助行器都能独立行走,则纳入研究。采用Cochrane手册作为提取数据的模板,并使用RoB 2.0工具评估偏倚风险。使用Hedges g进行随机效应荟萃分析,以汇总研究结果。本研究的主要结局是身体活动。
纳入21项研究,共2783名参与者。研究中参与者的年龄中位数为70.5岁,男性参与者的百分比中位数为42%,基线每日步数中位数为5268步。与对照干预相比,基于身体活动监测器的干预措施有中等程度的效果(标准化均数差=0.54,95%可信区间:0.34至0.73),相当于干预组每天平均增加1297步。未发现患者和干预特征对效应估计有影响。
与对照干预相比,基于身体活动监测器的干预措施对身体活动有中等程度效果的证据质量较低。需要更多研究方法标准更高的研究。
PROSPERO注册号:CRD42018083648。