1School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU UK.
2Department of Microbiology, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019 May 2;8:71. doi: 10.1186/s13756-019-0519-1. eCollection 2019.
Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of urinary tract infection (UTI) with antibiotics is a concern. In older adults, diagnosis of UTI using near-patient urine tests (reagent strip tests, dipsticks) is advised against because the age-related increase in asymptomatic bacteriuria can cause false-positive results. Instead, UTI diagnosis should be based on a full clinical assessment. Previous research lacks systematic information on urine dipstick use in hospitals. The aim of this study was to examine the use of urine dipstick tests and microbiology among older adult hospital admissions in relation to recommended UTI diagnostic criteria. A further aim was to assess factors associated with the use of dipsticks.
A case series review of patients aged ≥70 years admitted to two NHS Trust hospitals in England. Records from 312 patients admitted in 2015 meeting inclusion criteria were selected at random.
Of 298 complete patient records, 54% had at least one urine dipstick test recorded. 13% (21/161) of patients who received a urine dipstick test were diagnosed as having a UTI, only 2 out of these 21 cases had two or more clinical signs and symptoms. 60 patients received a second dipstick test, leading to 13 additional cases of UTI diagnosis. Dipstick tests were more likely to be performed on patients with a history of falls (OR 1.93, 95% CI:1.21, 3.07, < 0.01), and less likely on those with dementia (OR 0.44, 95% CI: 0.22, 0.87, < 0.05). The most common reason for testing was routine admissions policy (49.1% of cases), but these cases were predominantly in one hospital.
Use of urine dipstick tests was high among older adults admitted to hospitals. Most cases were asymptomatic and therefore received inappropriate antibiotic therapy. This paper highlights the need to implement new Public Health England diagnostic guidelines to hospital admission and emergency departments.
过度诊断和过度治疗尿路感染(UTI)并用抗生素是一个令人担忧的问题。对于老年人,建议避免使用床边尿液检测(试剂带检测、尿试纸)来诊断 UTI,因为与年龄相关的无症状菌尿会导致假阳性结果。相反,UTI 诊断应该基于完整的临床评估。以前的研究缺乏关于医院尿试纸使用的系统信息。本研究旨在检查与推荐的 UTI 诊断标准相关的老年住院患者中尿试纸检测和微生物学的使用情况。另一个目的是评估与使用尿试纸相关的因素。
对英格兰两家 NHS 信托医院≥70 岁住院患者的病例系列回顾。随机选择了 2015 年符合纳入标准的 312 名患者的完整病历。
在 298 份完整的患者记录中,有 54%记录了至少一次尿试纸检测。接受尿试纸检测的 298 名患者中有 13%(21/161)被诊断为患有 UTI,其中只有 2 例有 2 个或更多临床体征和症状。60 名患者接受了第二次尿试纸检测,导致额外 13 例 UTI 诊断。尿试纸检测更有可能在有跌倒史的患者中进行(OR 1.93,95%CI:1.21,3.07,<0.01),而在痴呆患者中则不太可能进行(OR 0.44,95%CI:0.22,0.87,<0.05)。检测的最常见原因是常规入院政策(49.1%的病例),但这些病例主要集中在一家医院。
在住院的老年患者中,尿试纸检测的使用非常普遍。大多数病例无症状,因此接受了不适当的抗生素治疗。本文强调了在医院入院和急诊科实施新的英格兰公共卫生署诊断指南的必要性。