Potter Katherine
Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky, United States.
J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2017 Dec;6(4):245-247. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1604014. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
The definitions of death have changed throughout recorded history to include not just cardiac death but death by neurological criteria as well. Given the many cultures present in the world, it comes as no surprise that declaring death takes many forms. In the Western world, brain death has gained common acceptance (though not universal), while other cultures and religions have struggled with this issue, especially as it surrounds the controversy of donated organs. There is legal precedent to support death by neurological criteria, as well as support for hospital systems and physicians to terminate somatic support of the brain-dead patient; however, these laws differ greatly from country to country. When dealing with a controversial topic, differing laws, and grief-laden families, it becomes especially crucial that health care staffs are educated regarding varying cultural beliefs surrounding death. In the majority of cases, with kindness and compassion, common ground between science and social perspectives can be found, leading to resolution of care for this group of patients.
纵观有记录的历史,死亡的定义不断变化,不仅包括心脏死亡,还包括基于神经学标准的死亡。鉴于世界上存在众多文化,宣布死亡有多种形式也就不足为奇了。在西方世界,脑死亡已得到普遍认可(尽管并非完全如此),而其他文化和宗教在这个问题上则存在困扰,尤其是围绕捐赠器官的争议。有法律先例支持基于神经学标准的死亡,也支持医院系统和医生终止对脑死亡患者的躯体支持;然而,这些法律在不同国家差异很大。在处理一个有争议的话题、不同的法律以及悲痛的家庭时,医护人员接受关于围绕死亡的不同文化信仰的教育变得尤为关键。在大多数情况下,通过善意和同情,可以找到科学与社会观点之间的共同点,从而解决对这组患者的护理问题。