Bookstein J J, Lang E V
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987 May;148(5):883-8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.148.5.883.
To establish a base of normality against which state-of-the-art penile arteriograms can be assessed, we analyzed selective magnification penile pharmacoarteriograms from 23 men who were not believed to have arteriogenic impotence. The penile arteries showed no evidence of acquired obstructive disease, and all individuals had had normal sexual function in the recent past. The vascular patterns were highly variable and frequently differed from classic descriptions found in textbooks of anatomy. Normal variations that could be easily confused with arterial obstruction were unilateral origin of all cavernosal branches, unilateral hypoplasia of a dorsal penile artery, and aberrant origin of bulbar or cavernosal arteries. Multiple potential collateral routes were shown, including transverse collaterals at the root of the penis and communications between cavernosal and dorsal penile arteries. Appreciation of the type and frequency of anatomic variants and potential collateral routes is important in correctly interpreting penile angiograms and in evaluating the hemodynamic significance of suspected stenoses.
为建立一个正常标准的基线,以便据此评估最新的阴茎动脉造影,我们分析了23名被认为没有动脉源性阳痿的男性的选择性放大阴茎药物动脉造影。阴茎动脉未显示出后天性阻塞性疾病的迹象,且所有个体近期性功能均正常。血管模式高度可变,且常常与解剖学教科书中的经典描述不同。容易与动脉阻塞相混淆的正常变异包括所有海绵体分支的单侧起源、阴茎背动脉的单侧发育不全以及球部或海绵体动脉的异常起源。研究显示了多条潜在的侧支循环途径,包括阴茎根部的横向侧支以及海绵体动脉与阴茎背动脉之间的交通支。了解解剖变异的类型和频率以及潜在的侧支循环途径,对于正确解读阴茎血管造影以及评估疑似狭窄的血流动力学意义至关重要。