Kommer Maya, Campbell E, Canty M
Institute of Neurological Sciences, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital and Royal Hospital for Children, 1345 Govan Road, Glasgow, Lanarkshire, G51 4TF, UK.
Childs Nerv Syst. 2019 Jul;35(7):1159-1163. doi: 10.1007/s00381-019-04186-0. Epub 2019 May 9.
To determine whether prior endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) influences the failure rate of subsequently placed ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunts.
Our institution's operative database and patient records were reviewed retrospectively to identify all paediatric patients who had undergone a first VP shunt or ETV at our institution between January 2012 and December 2015. Data was analysed using the Microsoft Excel, GraphPad Prism v7 and SPSS statistics. The literature on this topic to date was also reviewed.
Eighty-six children were included in the study: 61 patients had a primary VP shunt inserted during the study period and 25 had a VP shunt inserted following failed ETV. There was no significant difference in the underlying aetiology or age of the patients in each group. In the primary VP shunt group, 47.5% (29 patients) required shunt removal at an average of 274 days post-insertion (range 7 days to 3.4 years). The 1-year revision rate was 34.4%. In the shunt post-ETV group, 48% (12 patients) required shunt removal at an average of 207 days post-insertion (range 2 days to 2.7 years). The 1-year revision rate was 36%. The most common reason for revision in both groups was blockage.
We found no significant difference in failure rate or pattern between primarily inserted VP shunts and those inserted following an endoscopic third ventriculostomy. On the basis of this study and the small number of previously reported studies, we would advocate a trial of ETV where feasible to allow a chance at shunt independence.
确定既往内镜下第三脑室造瘘术(ETV)是否会影响随后置入的脑室腹腔分流术(VP)的失败率。
回顾性分析本机构的手术数据库和患者记录,以确定2012年1月至2015年12月期间在本机构接受首次VP分流术或ETV的所有儿科患者。使用Microsoft Excel、GraphPad Prism v7和SPSS统计软件进行数据分析。同时也回顾了迄今为止关于该主题的文献。
86名儿童纳入研究:61例患者在研究期间首次置入VP分流管,25例在ETV失败后置入VP分流管。两组患者的潜在病因或年龄无显著差异。在原发性VP分流组中,47.5%(29例患者)在置入后平均274天(范围7天至3.4年)需要移除分流管。1年翻修率为34.4%。在ETV后置分流管组中,48%(12例患者)在置入后平均207天(范围2天至2.7年)需要移除分流管。1年翻修率为36%。两组翻修的最常见原因是堵塞。
我们发现原发性置入的VP分流管与内镜下第三脑室造瘘术后置入的分流管在失败率或模式上无显著差异。基于本研究以及此前少量已发表的研究,我们主张在可行的情况下尝试ETV,以便有机会实现分流独立。