Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Division of Cardiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Clin Transplant. 2019 Jul;33(7):e13585. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13585. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
Despite limitations in sensitivity and specificity, estimation of the pulmonary artery systolic pressure (ePASP) on echocardiography is used for portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) screening in liver transplant (LT) candidates. We proposed that alternative echocardiographic models, such as estimated pulmonary vascular resistance (ePVR), may provide improved testing characteristics in PoPH screening. In a retrospective analysis of 100 LT candidates, we found that the formula ePVR = ePASP/VTI + 3 if MSN (VTI = right ventricular outflow tract time velocity integral; MSN = mid-systolic notching of the VTI Doppler signal) significantly improves accuracy of PoPH screening compared to ePASP. We determined the optimal ePVR cutoff for PoPH screening to be 2.76 Wood units, as this cutoff provided 100% sensitivity and 73% specificity in screening for clinically significant PoPH. Comparatively, ePASP at a cutoff of 40 mm Hg provided 91% sensitivity and 48% specificity. We devised a new screening algorithm based on the use of ePVR at intermediate ePASP values (35-54 mm Hg), and we confirmed the testing characteristics of this algorithm in a separate validation cohort of 50 LT candidates. In screening LT candidates for PoPH, the ePASP lacks accuracy, leading to unnecessary RHCs and undiagnosed cases of PoPH. A screening algorithm which incorporates the ePVR may be more reliable.
尽管超声心动图估测肺动脉收缩压(ePASP)在诊断移植前肺动脉高压(PoPH)方面存在敏感性和特异性的局限性,但仍被用于肝移植(LT)患者的 PoPH 筛查。我们提出,替代超声心动图模型,如估测肺血管阻力(ePVR),可能会在 PoPH 筛查中提供更好的检测特性。在对 100 例 LT 候选者的回顾性分析中,我们发现公式 ePVR=ePASP/VTI+3(其中 VTI 为右心室流出道时间速度积分,MSN 为 VTI 多普勒信号的收缩中期切迹)如果与 ePASP 相比,能显著提高 PoPH 筛查的准确性。我们确定了用于 PoPH 筛查的最佳 ePVR 截断值为 2.76 伍德单位,因为该截断值在筛查有临床意义的 PoPH 时具有 100%的敏感性和 73%的特异性。相比之下,ePASP 截断值为 40mmHg 时,敏感性为 91%,特异性为 48%。我们设计了一种新的筛查算法,基于在中间 ePASP 值(35-54mmHg)使用 ePVR,我们在 50 例 LT 候选者的独立验证队列中证实了该算法的检测特性。在对 LT 候选者进行 PoPH 筛查时,ePASP 的准确性不足,导致不必要的 RHC 和未诊断的 PoPH 病例。一种纳入 ePVR 的筛查算法可能更可靠。