Suppr超能文献

医疗保健专业人员的循证实践能力实践:系统评价概述。

Practicing Healthcare Professionals' Evidence-Based Practice Competencies: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.

机构信息

Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.

South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Science, Kuopio, Finland.

出版信息

Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2019 Jun;16(3):176-185. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12363. Epub 2019 May 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based practice (EBP) competencies are essential for all practicing healthcare professionals to provide evidence-based, quality care, and improved patient outcomes. The multistep EBP implementation process requires multifaceted competencies to successfully integrate best evidence into daily healthcare delivery.

AIMS

To summarize and synthesize the current research literature on practicing health professionals' EBP competencies (i.e., their knowledge, skills, attitudes, beliefs, and implementation) related to employing EBP in clinical decision-making.

DESIGN

An overview of systematic reviews.

METHODS

PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched on practicing healthcare professionals' EBP competencies published in January 2012-July 2017. A total of 3,947 publications were retrieved, of which 11 systematic reviews were eligible for a critical appraisal of methodological quality. Three independent reviewers conducted the critical appraisal using the Rapid Critical Appraisal tools developed by the Helene Fuld National Institute for Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Healthcare.

RESULTS

Practicing healthcare professionals' self-reported EBP knowledge, skills, attitudes, and beliefs were at a moderate to high level, but they did not translate into EBP implementation. Considerable overlap existed in the source studies across the included reviews. Few reviews reported any impact of EBP competencies on changes in care processes or patient outcomes. Most reviews were methodologically of moderate quality. Significant variation in study designs, settings, interventions, and outcome measures in the source studies precluded any comparisons of EBP competencies across healthcare disciplines.

LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION

As EBP is a shared competency, the development, adoption, and use of an EBP competency set for all healthcare professionals are a priority along with using actual (i.e., performance-based), validated outcome measures. The widespread misconceptions and misunderstandings that still exist among large proportions of practicing healthcare professionals about the basic concepts of EBP should urgently be addressed to increase engagement in EBP implementation and attain improved care quality and patient outcomes.

摘要

背景

循证实践(EBP)能力对于所有从事医疗保健的专业人员至关重要,有助于提供基于证据的优质护理,并改善患者的治疗效果。多步骤的 EBP 实施过程需要多方面的能力,以便成功地将最佳证据融入日常医疗保健服务中。

目的

总结和综合当前关于从事卫生保健专业人员 EBP 能力(即他们在运用 EBP 进行临床决策时的知识、技能、态度、信念和实施情况)的研究文献。

设计

系统综述概述。

方法

系统检索了 2012 年 1 月至 2017 年 7 月发表的关于从事医疗保健专业人员 EBP 能力的文献,检索数据库包括 PubMed/MEDLINE、CINAHL、Scopus 和 Cochrane Library。共检索到 3947 篇文献,其中 11 篇系统评价符合批判性评估方法学质量的标准。三名独立的评审员使用 Helene Fuld 国家护理和医疗保健循证实践研究所开发的快速批判性评估工具对这些系统评价进行了批判性评估。

结果

从事医疗保健的专业人员自我报告的 EBP 知识、技能、态度和信念处于中等至高水平,但这些能力并未转化为 EBP 的实际应用。纳入的综述中存在大量来源研究之间的重叠。很少有综述报告 EBP 能力对护理过程或患者治疗效果的任何影响。大多数综述的方法学质量为中等。来源研究在研究设计、设置、干预措施和结果测量方面存在显著差异,因此无法对不同医疗保健学科的 EBP 能力进行比较。

循证实践与行动的联系

由于 EBP 是一项共同的能力,因此应优先考虑为所有医疗保健专业人员制定、采用和使用 EBP 能力标准,并使用实际(即基于表现的)、经过验证的结果测量标准。目前,仍有很大一部分从事医疗保健的专业人员对 EBP 的基本概念存在广泛的误解和混淆,应紧急解决这些问题,以提高他们对 EBP 实施的参与度,并改善护理质量和患者的治疗效果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验