Berland Todd L, Clement Jason, Griffin Joseph, Westin Gregory G, Ebner Adrian
Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.
Department of Radiology, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2019 Oct;60:182-192. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.02.023. Epub 2019 May 8.
The use of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is hampered by long surgical wait times, slow maturation, and upwards of 60% that do not mature. We describe our clinical experience in using a system with a 4F catheter profile for endovascular AVF creation in patients on hemodialysis.
This was a multioperator, single-center, single-arm, prospective study intended to evaluate safety and efficacy of a 4 Fr endovascular AVF (endoAVF) system for the creation of vascular access in hemodialysis patients. The study was performed after institutional review board approval at Italian Hospital (Asuncion, Paraguay). Patients were followed up at regular intervals through 6 months to determine procedural, maturation, and cannulation success as well as intervention rate and patency.
From May to November 2016, 32 patients underwent the endoAVF procedure with no device-related adverse events. An endoAVF was successfully created in the proximal forearm for all 32 patients (20 between the radial artery and radial vein; 12 between the ulnar artery and ulnar vein). Wrist access was used for 72% (23/32) of the procedures for the arterial catheter and 59% (19/32) of the procedures for the venous catheter. The device successfully created an endoAVF in every patient for a technical success rate of 100% (32/32). The device- or procedure-related serious adverse event rate was 3% (1/32); one patient experienced a venous guidewire perforation successfully managed with a stent graft. Primary and cumulative patency rates through 6 months were 83% and 87%, respectively, with an intervention rate of 0.21 per patient-year. Physiological suitability, as defined by target flow rates ≥500 ml/min and cannulation vessel diameters ≥4 mm, was achieved in 91% (29/32) of patients by 90 days. Successful 2-needle cannulation was achieved in 78% (21/27) by 90 days, with mean time to cannulation of 43 ± 14 days. Functional cannulation, as defined by successful 2-needle cannulation for two-thirds of the dialysis sessions within 1 month, was achieved in 95% (20/21) of the patients who were successfully cannulated for an overall rate of 74% (20/27). All patients who achieved functional cannulation had their central venous catheters (CVCs) removed before the 90-day follow-up for a CVC removal rate of 74% (20/27).
The 4 Fr endoAVF system allowed for multiple access and fistula creation site options to tailor the procedure to individual patient anatomy. Furthermore, the outcomes are comparable to previous generation endoAVF technology, with a potentially improved safety profile because of the use of arteries at the wrist for access.
动静脉内瘘(AVF)的使用因手术等待时间长、成熟缓慢以及高达60%的内瘘未成熟而受到阻碍。我们描述了我们在使用一种4F导管轮廓系统为血液透析患者创建血管内AVF方面的临床经验。
这是一项多操作者、单中心、单臂前瞻性研究,旨在评估一种4Fr血管内AVF(endoAVF)系统在血液透析患者中创建血管通路的安全性和有效性。该研究在意大利医院(巴拉圭亚松森)获得机构审查委员会批准后进行。对患者进行定期随访,为期6个月,以确定手术、成熟和插管成功率以及干预率和通畅率。
2016年5月至11月,32例患者接受了endoAVF手术,未发生与器械相关的不良事件。所有32例患者均在前臂近端成功创建了endoAVF(20例在桡动脉和桡静脉之间;12例在尺动脉和尺静脉之间)。72%(23/32)的动脉导管手术和59%(19/32)的静脉导管手术采用了腕部入路。该器械在每位患者中均成功创建了endoAVF,技术成功率为100%(32/32)。器械或手术相关的严重不良事件发生率为3%(1/32);1例患者发生静脉导丝穿孔,通过覆膜支架成功处理。6个月时的初级通畅率和累积通畅率分别为83%和87%,每位患者每年的干预率为0.21。到90天时,91%(29/32)的患者达到了生理适宜性,即目标流速≥500 ml/min且插管血管直径≥4 mm。到90天时,78%(21/27)的患者成功实现了双针插管,平均插管时间为43±天。对于在1个月内三分之二的透析疗程中成功进行双针插管定义的功能性插管,在成功插管的患者中有95%(20/21)实现,总体发生率为74%(20/27)。所有实现功能性插管的患者在90天随访前均拔除了中心静脉导管(CVC),CVC拔除率为74%(20/27)。
4Fr endoAVF系统允许多种入路和内瘘创建部位选择,以根据个体患者解剖结构调整手术。此外,其结果与上一代endoAVF技术相当,由于使用腕部动脉进行入路,安全性可能有所提高。