• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生对极早产儿复苏的态度:系统评价。

Physicians' Attitudes on Resuscitation of Extremely Premature Infants: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Interfaculty Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law,

Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, and.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2019 Jun;143(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-3972. Epub 2019 May 10.

DOI:10.1542/peds.2018-3972
PMID:31076541
Abstract

CONTEXT

Whether to resuscitate extremely premature infants (EPIs) is a clinically and ethically difficult decision to make. Indications and practices vary greatly across different countries and institutions, which suggests that resuscitation decisions may be influenced more by the attitudes of the individual treating physicians. Hence, gaining in-depth insight into physicians' attitudes improves our understanding of decision-making regarding resuscitation of EPIs.

OBJECTIVE

To better understand physicians' attitudes toward resuscitation of EPIs and factors that influence their attitudes through a systematic review of the empirical literature.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus.

STUDY SELECTION

We selected English-language articles in which researchers report on empirical studies of physicians' attitudes toward resuscitation of EPIs.

DATA EXTRACTION

The articles were repeatedly read, themes were identified, and data were tabulated, compared, and analyzed descriptively.

RESULTS

Thirty-four articles were included. In general, physicians were more willing to resuscitate, to accept parents' resuscitation requests, and to refuse parents' nonresuscitation requests as gestational age (GA) increased. However, attitudes vary greatly for infants at GA 23 to 24 weeks, known as the gray zone. Although GA is the primary factor that influences physicians' attitudes, a complex interplay of patient- and non-patient-related factors also influences their attitudes.

LIMITATIONS

Analysis of English-only articles may limit generalizability of the results. In addition, authors of only 1 study used a qualitative approach, which may have led to a biased reductionist approach to understanding physicians' attitudes.

CONCLUSIONS

Although correlations between GA and attitudes emerged, the results suggested a more complex interplay of factors influencing such attitudes.

摘要

背景

是否对极早产儿(EPIs)进行复苏是一个临床和伦理上都难以做出的决策。不同国家和机构之间的复苏指征和实践差异很大,这表明复苏决策可能更多地受到治疗医生个体态度的影响。因此,深入了解医生的态度可以提高我们对 EPIs 复苏决策的理解。

目的

通过系统回顾实证文献,更好地了解医生对 EPIs 复苏的态度以及影响这些态度的因素。

数据来源

Medline、Embase、Web of Science 和 Scopus。

研究选择

我们选择了报告医生对 EPIs 复苏态度的实证研究的英语文章。

数据提取

文章反复阅读,确定主题,并对数据进行制表、比较和描述性分析。

结果

共纳入 34 篇文章。一般来说,随着胎龄(GA)的增加,医生更愿意复苏,接受父母的复苏请求,拒绝父母的非复苏请求。然而,GA 为 23 至 24 周的婴儿(被称为灰色地带)的态度差异很大。尽管 GA 是影响医生态度的主要因素,但患者和非患者相关因素的复杂相互作用也会影响他们的态度。

局限性

仅分析英语文章可能会限制结果的普遍性。此外,只有 1 项研究的作者使用了定性方法,这可能导致对医生态度的理解存在有偏见的简化方法。

结论

尽管 GA 与态度之间存在相关性,但结果表明影响这些态度的因素之间存在更复杂的相互作用。

相似文献

1
Physicians' Attitudes on Resuscitation of Extremely Premature Infants: A Systematic Review.医生对极早产儿复苏的态度:系统评价。
Pediatrics. 2019 Jun;143(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-3972. Epub 2019 May 10.
2
Neonatologists' Resuscitation Decisions at Birth for Extremely Premature Infants. A Belgian Qualitative Study.新生儿科医生对极早产儿出生时的复苏决策:一项比利时的定性研究
Front Pediatr. 2022 Mar 24;10:852073. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.852073. eCollection 2022.
3
Obstetricians' Attitudes Toward the Treatment of Extremely Preterm Infants in China.中国产科医生对极早产儿治疗的态度。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2233511. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.33511.
4
Neonatologists' decision-making for resuscitation and non-resuscitation of extremely preterm infants: ethical principles, challenges, and strategies-a qualitative study.新生儿科医生对极早产儿复苏和非复苏决策:伦理原则、挑战和策略——一项定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Sep 25;22(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00702-7.
5
Thresholds for Resuscitation of Extremely Preterm Infants in the UK, Sweden, and Netherlands.英国、瑞典和荷兰极低出生体重儿复苏的阈值。
Pediatrics. 2018 Sep;142(Suppl 1):S574-S584. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-0478I.
6
Resident Attitudes on Ethical and Medical Decision-Making for Neonates at the Limit of Viability.住院医师对处于生存极限的新生儿的伦理与医疗决策的态度。
Am J Perinatol. 2016 Apr;33(5):449-55. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1565916. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
7
Delivery room resuscitation decisions for extremely premature infants.极早产儿产房复苏决策
Pediatrics. 1998 Sep;102(3 Pt 1):574-82. doi: 10.1542/peds.102.3.574.
8
Survival at the threshold of viability: a nationwide survey of the opinions and attitudes of physicians in a developing country.在生存能力的边缘:对一个发展中国家医生的意见和态度的全国性调查。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2014 May;28(3):227-34. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12118. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
9
Resuscitation of preterm infants in the Philippines: a national survey of resources and practice.菲律宾早产儿复苏:资源和实践的全国调查。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2020 Mar;105(2):209-214. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-316951. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
10
Neonatologists' opinions regarding resuscitation of extremely premature infants in Connecticut and Rhode Island.康涅狄格州和罗德岛州新生儿科医生关于极早产儿复苏的意见。
Conn Med. 2002 Dec;66(12):733-8.

引用本文的文献

1
The Ethics and Practice of Periviability Care.围生期可存活护理的伦理与实践
Children (Basel). 2024 Mar 23;11(4):386. doi: 10.3390/children11040386.
2
Differences in the attitudes towards resuscitation of extremely premature infants between neonatologists and obstetricians: a survey study in China.新生儿科医生与产科医生对极早产儿复苏态度的差异:一项中国的调查研究
Front Pediatr. 2023 Dec 13;11:1308770. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1308770. eCollection 2023.
3
Race and Ethnicity of Infants Enrolled in Neonatal Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review.
种族和民族的婴儿参加新生儿临床试验:系统评价。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Dec 1;6(12):e2348882. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.48882.
4
Opportunities and Challenges of Prognostic Models for Extremely Preterm Infants.极早产儿预后模型的机遇与挑战
Children (Basel). 2023 Oct 21;10(10):1712. doi: 10.3390/children10101712.
5
Extremely premature birth bioethical decision-making supported by dialogics and pragmatism.通过对话主义和实用主义支持的极早产出生的生物伦理决策。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Feb 11;24(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00887-z.
6
Parental Views of Facilitators and Barriers to Research Participation: Systematic Review.家长对参与研究的促进因素和障碍的看法:系统评价。
Pediatrics. 2023 Jan 1;151(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-058067.
7
Attitudes About Extremely Preterm Birth Among Obstetric and Neonatal Health Care Professionals in England: A Qualitative Study.英国产科和新生儿保健专业人员对超早产儿出生态度的定性研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2241802. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.41802.
8
Obstetricians' Attitudes Toward the Treatment of Extremely Preterm Infants in China.中国产科医生对极早产儿治疗的态度。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2233511. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.33511.
9
Active Treatment of Infants Born at 22-25 Weeks of Gestation in California, 2011-2018.加利福尼亚州 2011-2018 年 22-25 孕周出生婴儿的积极治疗。
J Pediatr. 2022 Oct;249:67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.06.013. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
10
Longitudinal medical needs for periviable NICU survivors.极早产儿新生儿重症监护病房幸存者的纵向医疗需求。
Early Hum Dev. 2022 Jun;169:105580. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2022.105580. Epub 2022 May 8.