Suppr超能文献

验证 Dental Practicality Index 预测根管再治疗效果的有效性。

Validation of the effectiveness of the Dental Practicality Index in predicting the outcome of root canal retreatments.

机构信息

Centre for Oral, Clinical & Translational Sciences, King's College London Dental Institute, London, UK.

Ministry of Health, Kuwait City, Kuwait.

出版信息

Int Endod J. 2019 Oct;52(10):1403-1409. doi: 10.1111/iej.13142. Epub 2019 Jun 17.

Abstract

AIM

To assess the effectiveness of the Dental Practicality Index (DPI) in predicting the outcome of root canal retreatment in posterior teeth.

METHODOLOGY

One hundred and thirty-seven posterior teeth with symptoms and/or signs of post-treatment endodontic disease requiring root canal retreatment and previously included in a clinical trial were selected. Clinical and radiographic examinations including digital periapical and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) were obtained pre-treatment and 1-year postoperatively from a previous study. Two calibrated and trained assessors who were unaware of the treatment outcome assessed the pre-treatment clinical records of these cases using the DPI. The DPI score was then compared to the outcome of the root canal retreatment. A Chi-square/Fisher's exact test was used to establish a relationship between categorical variables, the total score of DPI vs outcome.

RESULTS

Retreated teeth with DPI scores equal to 6 or above had an unfavourable outcome of 50% vs 14% of teeth with DPI below 6. Teeth with DPI score equal to 3 or above had an unfavourable outcome of 23% versus 2%, for teeth below 3. Molar teeth with a DPI score below 3 had a favourable outcome percentage of 96%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlighted that using the DPI gave a good outcome prediction for root canal retreatments. However, further research, including the prospective assessment of a wider range of cases undertaken by a larger group of examiners is needed to further validate the DPI.

摘要

目的

评估牙科操作性指数(DPI)在预测后牙根管再治疗效果的有效性。

方法

选择 137 颗因治疗后出现牙髓病或根尖周病的症状和/或体征,需要进行根管再治疗的后牙,这些牙齿之前都包含在一项临床试验中。从之前的研究中获取了临床和放射学检查,包括数字化根尖片和锥形束 CT(CBCT)。两名经过校准和培训的评估员在不知道治疗结果的情况下,使用 DPI 评估这些病例的治疗前临床记录。然后将 DPI 评分与根管再治疗的结果进行比较。使用卡方/Fisher 精确检验来确定分类变量之间的关系,即 DPI 总分与结果之间的关系。

结果

DPI 评分等于或大于 6 的再治疗牙齿的不良结局率为 50%,而 DPI 评分低于 6 的牙齿的不良结局率为 14%。DPI 评分等于或大于 3 的牙齿的不良结局率为 23%,而 DPI 评分低于 3 的牙齿的不良结局率为 2%。DPI 评分低于 3 的磨牙的良好结局率为 96%。

结论

本研究表明,使用 DPI 可以对根管再治疗的效果进行良好的预测。然而,需要进一步的研究,包括更广泛的病例的前瞻性评估和更多评估员的参与,以进一步验证 DPI。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验