• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用在线视频进行牙科实用性指数培训对牙科本科生治疗计划决策和信心水平的影响。

Effect of Dental Practicality Index training using an online video on decision-making and confidence level in treatment planning by dental undergraduates.

作者信息

See Zhai Wei, Lee Ming Sern, Parolia Abhishek, Kanagasingam Shalini, Gunjal Shilpa, Patel Shanon

机构信息

School of Dentistry, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Department of Endodontics, University of Iowa College of Dentistry and Dental Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.

出版信息

Restor Dent Endod. 2024 Jan 24;49(1):e8. doi: 10.5395/rde.2024.49.e8. eCollection 2024 Feb.

DOI:10.5395/rde.2024.49.e8
PMID:38449491
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10912547/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of Dental Practicality Index (DPI) training using an online video on the treatment planning decisions and confidence level of dental undergraduates (DUs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety-four DUs were shown 15 clinical case scenarios and asked to decide on treatment plans based on 4 treatment options. The most appropriate treatment plan had been decided by a consensus panel of experienced dentists. DUs then underwent DPI training using an online video. In a post-DPI-training test, DUs were shown the same clinical case scenarios and asked to assign the best treatment option. After 6 weeks, DUs were retested to assess their knowledge retention. In all 3 tests, DUs completed the confidence level scale questionnaire. Data were analyzed using the related-samples Wilcoxon signed rank test and the independent-samples Mann-Whitney test with the level of significance set at < 0.05.

RESULTS

DPI training significantly improved the mean scores of the DUs from 7.53 in the pre-DPI-training test to 9.01 in the post-DPI-training test ( < 0.001). After 6 weeks, the mean scores decreased marginally to 8.87 in the retention test ( = 0.563). DPI training increased their confidence level from 5.68 pre-DPI training to 7.09 post-DPI training.

CONCLUSIONS

Training DUs using DPI with an online video improved their decision-making and confidence level in treatment planning.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估使用在线视频进行牙科实用性指数(DPI)培训对牙科本科生(DUs)治疗计划决策和信心水平的影响。

材料与方法

向94名牙科本科生展示15个临床病例场景,并要求他们根据4种治疗方案决定治疗计划。最合适的治疗方案由经验丰富的牙医组成的共识小组确定。然后,牙科本科生使用在线视频接受DPI培训。在DPI培训后的测试中,向牙科本科生展示相同的临床病例场景,并要求他们选择最佳治疗方案。6周后,对牙科本科生进行重新测试,以评估他们的知识保留情况。在所有3次测试中,牙科本科生都完成了信心水平量表问卷。使用相关样本Wilcoxon符号秩检验和独立样本Mann-Whitney检验对数据进行分析,显著性水平设定为<0.05。

结果

DPI培训显著提高了牙科本科生的平均分数,从DPI培训前测试中的7.53分提高到DPI培训后测试中的9.01分(<0.001)。6周后,在保留测试中平均分数略有下降,降至8.87分(=0.563)。DPI培训将他们的信心水平从DPI培训前的5.68提高到DPI培训后的7.09。

结论

使用DPI和在线视频对牙科本科生进行培训可提高他们在治疗计划中的决策能力和信心水平。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/963c/10912547/2a5e2f61f8d8/rde-49-e8-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/963c/10912547/cba0cbe124c6/rde-49-e8-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/963c/10912547/af5539576804/rde-49-e8-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/963c/10912547/2a5e2f61f8d8/rde-49-e8-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/963c/10912547/cba0cbe124c6/rde-49-e8-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/963c/10912547/af5539576804/rde-49-e8-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/963c/10912547/2a5e2f61f8d8/rde-49-e8-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of Dental Practicality Index training using an online video on decision-making and confidence level in treatment planning by dental undergraduates.使用在线视频进行牙科实用性指数培训对牙科本科生治疗计划决策和信心水平的影响。
Restor Dent Endod. 2024 Jan 24;49(1):e8. doi: 10.5395/rde.2024.49.e8. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
The impact of the Dental Practicality Index on treatment planning.
Br Dent J. 2021 May 13. doi: 10.1038/s41415-021-2948-5.
3
The Dental Practicality Index - to treat or not to treat.口腔实用性指数 - 治疗还是不治疗。
Br Dent J. 2024 Jun;236(11):872-875. doi: 10.1038/s41415-024-7450-4. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
4
Treatment planning for peripheral arterial disease based on duplex ultrasonography and computed tomography angiography: consistency, confidence and the value of additional imaging.基于双功能超声和计算机断层血管造影的外周动脉疾病治疗计划:一致性、信心和额外成像的价值。
Surgery. 2014 Aug;156(2):492-502. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.03.035. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
5
Study to Investigate the Knowledge of Rare Diseases among Dentists, Orthodontists, Periodontists, Oral Surgeons and Craniomaxillofacial Surgeons.研究调查牙医、正畸医生、牙周医生、口腔颌面外科医生对罕见病的认知。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 28;18(1):139. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010139.
6
Validation of the effectiveness of the Dental Practicality Index in predicting the outcome of root canal retreatments.验证 Dental Practicality Index 预测根管再治疗效果的有效性。
Int Endod J. 2019 Oct;52(10):1403-1409. doi: 10.1111/iej.13142. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
7
A prospective study on the effect of coronal tooth structure loss on the 4-year clinical survival of root canal retreated teeth and retrospective validation of the Dental Practicality Index.根管再治疗牙 4 年临床保存率的前瞻性研究及牙实用指数的回顾性验证
Int Endod J. 2020 Aug;53(8):1040-1049. doi: 10.1111/iej.13322. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
8
Assessing dentist and dental student knowledge of and attitudes towards shared decision-making in the United Kingdom.评估英国牙医和牙科学生对共同决策的知识和态度。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2021 Nov;25(4):768-777. doi: 10.1111/eje.12656. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
9
Comparative Analysis of Manual Dexterity of Dental Students at Ajman University following One Academic Year of Preclinical Training Sessions: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.阿治曼大学牙科学生经过一学年临床前培训课程后手部灵巧度的比较分析:一项纵向队列研究
Eur J Dent. 2023 Oct;17(4):1179-1188. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1758793. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
10
Skill Retention of Light-Curing Technique Using Only Verbal Instructions versus Using an Instructional Video: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study of Dental Students.仅使用口头指导与使用教学视频进行光固化技术技能保留情况:牙科学生的一项为期2年的随访研究。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2023 Apr 21;14:391-405. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S400823. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical decision-making in complex endodontic cases between postgraduate students across dental specialties at a UK dental school: A pilot study.英国某牙科学校不同牙科专业研究生在复杂牙髓病例中的临床决策:一项试点研究。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2022 Nov;26(4):707-716. doi: 10.1111/eje.12751. Epub 2022 Jan 2.
2
The impact of the Dental Practicality Index on treatment planning.
Br Dent J. 2021 May 13. doi: 10.1038/s41415-021-2948-5.
3
The restoration of root filled teeth: a review of the clinical literature.根管治疗后的牙齿修复:临床文献回顾。
Int Endod J. 2021 Apr;54(4):509-535. doi: 10.1111/iej.13438. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
4
A prospective study on the effect of coronal tooth structure loss on the 4-year clinical survival of root canal retreated teeth and retrospective validation of the Dental Practicality Index.根管再治疗牙 4 年临床保存率的前瞻性研究及牙实用指数的回顾性验证
Int Endod J. 2020 Aug;53(8):1040-1049. doi: 10.1111/iej.13322. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
5
Herodontics - is there a place for maintaining the apparently hopeless tooth?颌学——是否有保留看似无望的牙齿的位置?
Aust Dent J. 2019 Jun;64 Suppl 1:S71-S79. doi: 10.1111/adj.12698.
6
Validation of the effectiveness of the Dental Practicality Index in predicting the outcome of root canal retreatments.验证 Dental Practicality Index 预测根管再治疗效果的有效性。
Int Endod J. 2019 Oct;52(10):1403-1409. doi: 10.1111/iej.13142. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
7
The Dental Practicality Index - assessing the restorability of teeth.牙科实用性指数——评估牙齿的可修复性。
Br Dent J. 2017 May 26;222(10):755-758. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.447.
8
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.
9
Preparedness of undergraduate dental students in the United Kingdom: a national study.英国本科牙科学生的准备情况:一项全国性研究。
Br Dent J. 2017 Mar 24;222(6):472-477. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.272.
10
Preparedness of dental graduates for foundation training: a qualitative study.牙科毕业生基础培训的准备情况:一项定性研究。
Br Dent J. 2014 Aug;217(3):145-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.648.