Suppr超能文献

胸部按压会降低失血性创伤性心脏骤停动物模型的存活率。

Closed chest compressions reduce survival in an animal model of haemorrhage-induced traumatic cardiac arrest.

机构信息

CBR Division, Dstl Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire, SP4 0JQ, UK.

Academic Department of Military Emergency Medicine, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Birmingham, UK; Emergency Department, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2019 Jul;140:37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.04.048. Epub 2019 May 9.

Abstract

Closed chest compressions (CCC) are recommended for medical cardiac arrest, but there is little evidence to support their inclusion for traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA). This laboratory study evaluated CCC following haemorrhage-induced TCA and whether resuscitation with blood improved survival compared to saline. The study was conducted with the authority of UK Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 (received institutional ethical approval and a Home Office Licence) using 39 terminally anesthetised, instrumented, juvenile Large White pigs. Following baseline measurements, animals underwent captive bolt injury to the right thigh and controlled haemorrhage (30% blood volume). Sixty minutes later there was a further haemorrhage to a MAP of 20 mmHg. The randomised resuscitation protocol was initiated within 5 min: CCC (Group 1); IV whole blood (Group 2); IV 0.9% saline (Group 3); IV whole blood + CCC (Group 4); and IV saline + CCC (Group 5). Fluid was administered as 3 × 10 ml/kg boluses using the Belmont® Rapid Infuser. The LUCAS™ II Chest Compression System delivered CCC. Primary Outcome was attainment of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC MAP ≥ 50 mmHg) at Study End (fifteen minutes post-resuscitation) and secondary outcomes included haemodynamics. Mortality (MAP≤10 mmHg) was significantly higher in Group 1 compared to Groups 2 and 3 (P < 0.0001). Resuscitation with whole blood was significantly better than saline (P = 0.0069), no animals in Group 3 attained ROSC. The addition of chest compressions to fluid resuscitation resulted in a significantly worse outcome with saline resuscitation (P = 0.0023) but not with whole blood (P = 0.4411). Cardiovascular variables at the end of the Resuscitation Phase and Study End were significantly worse for Group 5 compared to Group 3. Some significant differences were present at the end of the Resuscitation Phase for Group 4 versus Group 2 but these differences were no longer present by Study End. CCC were associated with increased mortality and compromised haemodynamics compared to intravenous fluid resuscitation. Whole blood resuscitation was better than saline.

摘要

胸外按压(CCC)被推荐用于医学心搏骤停,但很少有证据支持将其用于创伤性心搏骤停(TCA)。本实验室研究评估了出血性 TCA 后 CCC 的应用,并比较了血液复苏与生理盐水复苏的存活率。该研究是在英国动物(科学程序)法案 1986 年的授权下进行的(获得了机构伦理批准和内政部许可证),使用了 39 只终末期麻醉、仪器化的幼大白猪。在基线测量后,动物右大腿被捕获螺栓损伤并控制出血(30%血容量)。60 分钟后,MAP 进一步下降至 20mmHg,进行了进一步出血。随机复苏方案在 5 分钟内启动:CCC(第 1 组);静脉注射全血(第 2 组);静脉注射 0.9%生理盐水(第 3 组);静脉注射全血+CCC(第 4 组);静脉注射生理盐水+CCC(第 5 组)。使用 Belmont®快速输液器以 3×10ml/kg 推注的方式给予液体。LUCAS™ II 胸部按压系统进行 CCC。主要结果是在研究结束时(复苏后 15 分钟)达到自主循环恢复(ROSC MAP≥50mmHg),次要结果包括血流动力学。与第 2 组和第 3 组相比,第 1 组的死亡率(MAP≤10mmHg)明显更高(P<0.0001)。全血复苏明显优于生理盐水(P=0.0069),第 3 组没有动物达到 ROSC。与液体复苏相比,在胸部按压的基础上增加液体复苏的效果更差,生理盐水复苏(P=0.0023),但全血复苏则不然(P=0.4411)。与第 3 组相比,第 5 组在复苏阶段和研究结束时的心血管变量明显更差。与第 2 组相比,第 4 组在复苏阶段结束时存在一些显著差异,但这些差异在研究结束时不再存在。与静脉液体复苏相比,CCC 与死亡率增加和血液动力学受损有关。全血复苏优于生理盐水。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验