• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胎源通过 p21 赋予肝巨噬细胞放射抗性。

Fetal origin confers radioresistance on liver macrophages via p21.

机构信息

Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

J Hepatol. 2019 Sep;71(3):553-562. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.04.015. Epub 2019 May 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhep.2019.04.015
PMID:31077791
Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Cells of hematopoietic origin, including macrophages, are generally radiation sensitive, but a subset of Kupffer cells (KCs) is relatively radioresistant. Here, we focused on the identity of the radioresistant KCs in unmanipulated mice and the mechanism of radioresistance.

METHODS

We employed Emr1- and inducible CX3Cr1-based fate-mapping strategies combined with the RiboTag reporter to identify the total KCs and the embryo-derived KCs, respectively. The KC compartment was reconstituted with adult bone-marrow-derived KCs (bm-KCs) using clodronate depletion. Mice were lethally irradiated and transplanted with donor bone marrow, and the radioresistance of bone-marrow- or embryo-derived KCs was studied. Gene expression was analyzed using in situ mRNA isolation via RiboTag reporter mice, and the translatomes were compared among subsets.

RESULTS

Here, we identified the radioresistant KCs as the long-lived subset that is derived from CX3CR1-expressing progenitor cells in fetal life, while adult bm-KCs do not resist irradiation. While both subsets upregulated the Cdkn1a gene, encoding p21- protein, radioresistant embryo-derived KCs showed a greater increase in response to irradiation. In the absence of this molecule, the radioresistance of KCs was compromised. Replacement KCs, derived from adult hematopoietic stem cells, differed from radioresistant KCs in their expression of genes related to immunity and phagocytosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Here, we show that, in the murine liver, a subset of KCs of embryonic origin resists lethal irradiation through Cdkn1a upregulation and is maintained for a long period, while bm-KCs do not survive lethal irradiation.

LAY SUMMARY

Kupffer cells (KCs) are the tissue-resident macrophages of the liver. KCs can be originated from fetal precursors and from monocytes during the fetal stage and post-birth, respectively. Most immune cells in mice are sensitive to lethal-irradiation-induced death, while a subset of KCs resists radiation-induced death. These radioresistant KCs continue to live in the irradiated mice. We discovered that this relatively radioresistant KC subset are the fetal-derived KCs, and they achieve this through cell-cycle arrest. Understanding the radiobiology of KCs will provide valuable insights into the mechanisms that elicit radiation-induced liver disease.

摘要

背景与目的

造血细胞来源的细胞,包括巨噬细胞,通常对辐射敏感,但一部分库普弗细胞(KCs)具有相对的辐射抗性。在这里,我们专注于未受干预的小鼠中辐射抗性 KC 的特征及其辐射抗性的机制。

方法

我们采用 Emr1 和诱导型 CX3Cr1 为基础的命运映射策略,结合 RiboTag 报告基因分别鉴定总 KC 和胚胎衍生的 KC。用氯膦酸盐耗竭重建 KC 区室,使用成年骨髓来源的 KC(bm-KC)。用致死剂量照射小鼠并移植供体骨髓,研究骨髓或胚胎来源的 KC 的辐射抗性。使用 RiboTag 报告基因小鼠通过原位 mRNA 分离分析基因表达,并比较各亚群的翻译组。

结果

在这里,我们鉴定出辐射抗性 KC 为长寿命亚群,它来源于胎儿期表达 CX3CR1 的祖细胞,而成年 bm-KC 不能抵抗照射。虽然两个亚群均上调 Cdkn1a 基因,编码 p21-蛋白,但辐射抗性胚胎衍生的 KC 对照射的反应增加更大。在缺乏这种分子的情况下,KC 的辐射抗性受损。来自成年造血干细胞的替代 KC,在其与免疫和吞噬相关的基因表达方面与辐射抗性 KC 不同。

结论

在这里,我们表明,在小鼠肝脏中,一部分胚胎起源的 KC 通过 Cdkn1a 的上调抵抗致死性照射,并长期维持,而 bm-KC 不能在致死性照射下存活。

概要

库普弗细胞(KC)是肝脏的组织驻留巨噬细胞。KC 可以来源于胎儿前体,也可以来源于胎儿期和出生后的单核细胞。大多数免疫细胞在小鼠中对致死性辐射诱导的死亡敏感,而一部分 KC 抵抗辐射诱导的死亡。这些辐射抗性 KC 继续在照射的小鼠中存活。我们发现,这种相对辐射抗性的 KC 亚群是由胎儿衍生的 KC,它们通过细胞周期停滞来实现这一目的。了解 KC 的放射生物学将为辐射诱导的肝脏疾病的机制提供有价值的见解。

相似文献

1
Fetal origin confers radioresistance on liver macrophages via p21.胎源通过 p21 赋予肝巨噬细胞放射抗性。
J Hepatol. 2019 Sep;71(3):553-562. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.04.015. Epub 2019 May 9.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
[Analysis of the number, type, and functional heterogeneity of senescent cells in the radiation-induced skin wounds in mice].[小鼠辐射诱导皮肤伤口中衰老细胞的数量、类型及功能异质性分析]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Yu Chuang Mian Xiu Fu Za Zhi. 2025 Jun 20;41(6):577-586. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20240604-00209.
4
Kupffer cell programming by maternal obesity triggers fatty liver disease.母体肥胖导致的库普弗细胞编程引发脂肪肝疾病。
Nature. 2025 Jun 18. doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09190-w.
5
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
6
Does Augmenting Irradiated Autografts With Free Vascularized Fibula Graft in Patients With Bone Loss From a Malignant Tumor Achieve Union, Function, and Complication Rate Comparably to Patients Without Bone Loss and Augmentation When Reconstructing Intercalary Resections in the Lower Extremity?对于因恶性肿瘤导致骨缺损的患者,在重建下肢节段性切除时,采用带血管游离腓骨移植来增强照射后的自体骨移植,其骨愈合、功能及并发症发生率与无骨缺损且未进行增强的患者相比是否相当?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003599.
7
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
8
Discrepant Phenotyping of Monocytes Based on CX3CR1 and CCR2 Using Fluorescent Reporters and Antibodies.基于荧光报告物和抗体的 CX3CR1 和 CCR2 对单核细胞进行差异表型分析。
Cells. 2024 May 10;13(10):819. doi: 10.3390/cells13100819.
9
CCR2 recruits monocytes to the lung, while CX3CR1 modulates positioning of CD11c cells in the lymph node during pulmonary tuberculosis.CCR2将单核细胞募集到肺部,而CX3CR1在肺结核期间调节CD11c细胞在淋巴结中的定位。
mBio. 2025 Jul 9;16(7):e0123725. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01237-25. Epub 2025 Jun 11.
10
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
A single dose of radiation elicits comparable acute salivary gland injury to fractionated radiation.单次剂量的辐射引发的急性唾液腺损伤与分次辐射相当。
Dis Model Mech. 2024 Aug 1;17(8). doi: 10.1242/dmm.050733. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
2
The roles of tissue resident macrophages in health and cancer.组织驻留巨噬细胞在健康和癌症中的作用。
Exp Hematol Oncol. 2024 Jan 16;13(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40164-023-00469-0.
3
Ontogeny, functions and reprogramming of Kupffer cells upon infectious disease.库普弗细胞在感染性疾病中的个体发生、功能和重编程。
Front Immunol. 2023 Aug 25;14:1238452. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1238452. eCollection 2023.
4
Responses of hepatic sinusoidal cells to liver ischemia-reperfusion injury.肝窦状细胞对肝脏缺血再灌注损伤的反应。
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023 Apr 4;11:1171317. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1171317. eCollection 2023.
5
Radiation-induced liver disease: beyond DNA damage.放射性肝损伤:超越 DNA 损伤。
Cell Cycle. 2023 Mar;22(5):506-526. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2022.2131163. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
6
The versatility of macrophage heterogeneity in liver fibrosis.巨噬细胞异质性在肝纤维化中的多功能性。
Front Immunol. 2022 Aug 5;13:968879. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.968879. eCollection 2022.
7
Heterogeneity and Function of Kupffer Cells in Liver Injury.肝损伤中库普弗细胞的异质性和功能。
Front Immunol. 2022 Jun 27;13:940867. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.940867. eCollection 2022.
8
Tumour-associated macrophages heterogeneity drives resistance to clinical therapy.肿瘤相关巨噬细胞异质性导致对临床治疗的抵抗。
Expert Rev Mol Med. 2022 Apr 11;24:e17. doi: 10.1017/erm.2022.8.
9
Fate-mapping mice: new tools and technology for immune discovery.命运映射小鼠:免疫发现的新工具和新技术。
Trends Immunol. 2022 Mar;43(3):195-209. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2022.01.004. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
10
COMMD10 is critical for Kupffer cell survival and controls Ly6C monocyte differentiation and inflammation in the injured liver.COMMD10 对于库普弗细胞的存活至关重要,并控制着损伤肝脏中 Ly6C 单核细胞的分化和炎症反应。
Cell Rep. 2021 Nov 16;37(7):110026. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110026.