Department of Pediatrics, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles (J Maniscalco and AC Gay).
Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, The Children's Hospital of San Antonio, Tex (E Davis, SF Denniston).
Acad Pediatr. 2019 Aug;19(6):703-711. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2019.05.003. Epub 2019 May 9.
To identify factors that influence faculty to promote or reduce the expression of autonomy for pediatric hospital medicine (PHM) fellows and describe behaviors faculty employ to support fellow autonomy in the clinical setting.
This was a multicenter, qualitative study using semistructured interviews with core faculty in PHM fellowships. Data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using a phenomenological approach. Each transcript was coded independently by 2 trained reviewers who then met to reconcile differences. Codes were identified using an iterative approach and organized into themes. Investigators engaged in peer debriefing during data collection, and member checking confirmed the results.
Interviews were conducted December 2016 to January 2017 with 20 faculty from 5 PHM fellowships. Most participants were female (12, 60%) and assistant (13, 65%) or associate (6, 30%) professors. Data analysis yielded 6 themes. Themes reflect the importance of faculty experience, style, and approach to balancing patient care with education in the provision of autonomy for PHM fellows. Faculty appreciation for the role of autonomy in medical education, investment in their roles as educators, and investment in PHM fellowship training are also influential factors. Finally, fellow clinical, educational, leadership, and communication skills influence the provision of autonomy. Faculty employ various levels of supervision, scaffolding techniques, and direct observation with feedback to support fellow autonomy. Professional development was considered essential for developing these skills.
We identified 6 themes related to faculty provision of autonomy to PHM fellows, as well as strategies employed by faculty to support fellow autonomy.
确定影响教员促进或减少儿科医院医学(PHM)研究员自主性表达的因素,并描述教员在临床环境中支持研究员自主性的行为。
这是一项多中心、定性研究,采用 PHM 研究员核心教员的半结构式访谈。数据逐字转录并使用现象学方法进行分析。每个转录本由 2 名经过培训的评审员独立编码,然后开会解决差异。使用迭代方法识别代码,并将其组织成主题。调查员在数据收集过程中进行同行讨论,成员检查确认结果。
2016 年 12 月至 2017 年 1 月,对来自 5 个 PHM 研究员项目的 20 名教员进行了访谈。大多数参与者为女性(12 名,60%),为助理教授(13 名,65%)或副教授(6 名,30%)。数据分析产生了 6 个主题。这些主题反映了教员经验、风格和平衡患者护理与教育以提供 PHM 研究员自主性的方法的重要性。教员对自主性在医学教育中的作用的欣赏、对作为教育者的角色的投入以及对 PHM 研究员培训的投入也是影响因素。最后,研究员的临床、教育、领导和沟通技能影响自主性的提供。教员采用各种监督水平、支架技术和直接观察与反馈来支持研究员的自主性。专业发展被认为是发展这些技能的关键。
我们确定了 6 个与教员向 PHM 研究员提供自主性相关的主题,以及教员支持研究员自主性所采用的策略。