Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
World Neurosurg. 2019 Aug;128:e719-e731. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.04.247. Epub 2019 May 8.
The National Cancer Database (NCDB) and the SEER (Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results) program are the 2 largest cancer registries in the United States. However, considerable differences exist between them regarding the sampling frame as well as the participating facility characteristics. In this study, NCDB and SEER are compared for primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors with the aims of discussing the implications for researchers and evaluating the generalizability of both databases.
Patients with primary CNS (brain and spinal cord) tumors from 2004 to 2013 were identified using the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition topographic codes. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment-related variables were compared between the 2 databases using standardized differences, with values >0.1 denoting statistical significance.
A total of 588,534 primary brain tumor (NCDB, 416,162; SEER, 172,372) and 34,827 primary spinal cord tumor (NCDB, 26,602; SEER, 8225) cases were identified. We found significant differences regarding age (sd. diff., 0.16 for brain; 0.13 for spinal cord), and Hispanic origin (sd. diff., 0.34 for brain; 0.61 for spinal cord). For NCDB and SEER patients, estimated 5-year overall survival was 59% and 64%, respectively.
Analysis of 623,361 patients with primary CNS tumors, which are identified using both the NCDB and SEER databases, showed significant differences in age, histopathologic classification of tumors, tumor behavior, and treatment of tumors between 2 databases. Overall, the differences observed between 2 databases provide helpful points for the researchers who would like to use NCDB or SEER. These observations should be taken into account when researchers design studies using these databases and discuss the generalizability of their findings.
国家癌症数据库(NCDB)和监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)计划是美国最大的两个癌症登记处。然而,它们在抽样框架以及参与机构特征方面存在相当大的差异。本研究旨在比较 NCDB 和 SEER 用于原发性中枢神经系统(CNS)肿瘤,讨论对研究人员的影响,并评估两个数据库的普遍性。
使用国际肿瘤疾病分类学第三版拓扑代码,从 2004 年至 2013 年确定原发性 CNS(脑和脊髓)肿瘤患者。使用标准化差异比较两个数据库中患者的人口统计学特征、肿瘤特征和治疗相关变量,差异值>0.1 表示具有统计学意义。
共确定了 588534 例原发性脑肿瘤(NCDB,416162 例;SEER,172372 例)和 34827 例原发性脊髓肿瘤(NCDB,26602 例;SEER,8225 例)。我们发现年龄(脑,0.16;脊髓,0.13)和西班牙裔起源(脑,0.34;脊髓,0.61)方面存在显著差异。对于 NCDB 和 SEER 患者,估计 5 年总生存率分别为 59%和 64%。
使用 NCDB 和 SEER 数据库分析 623361 例原发性 CNS 肿瘤患者,结果显示两个数据库之间在年龄、肿瘤组织病理学分类、肿瘤行为和肿瘤治疗方面存在显著差异。总体而言,两个数据库之间的差异为希望使用 NCDB 或 SEER 的研究人员提供了有益的信息。研究人员在使用这些数据库设计研究并讨论其发现的普遍性时,应考虑到这些观察结果。