Grovas A, Fremgen A, Rauck A, Ruymann F B, Hutchinson C L, Winchester D P, Menck H R
Children's Hospital, and Department of Pediatrics, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, USA.
Cancer. 1997 Dec 15;80(12):2321-32. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19971215)80:12<2321::aid-cncr14>3.0.co;2-w.
Patterns of and progress against childhood cancer have been reported on multi-institution, regional, national, and international bases by several sources in the past. These sources have included clinical cooperative group trials and population-based registries. In general, the population-based surveys have excluded brain tumors of either benign or uncertain behavior. The authors of this article investigated the patterns of data reported for the period 1985-1993, motivated by their interest in assessing the potential of National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) data to 1) facilitate individual institution review and 2) cover institutions that are not members of the Pediatric Oncology Group or the Children's Cancer Group, which are both national clinical cooperative groups.
Six annual calls for data, starting with a call for 1985 and 1988 cases, were issued to approximately 2100 hospitals with cancer programs (1340 programs approved by the Commission on Cancer of the American College of Surgeons and 760 other programs). The baseline data items of the NCDB included patient demography, tumor characteristics, initial treatment, and follow-up. The data for each patient were coded in the traditional manner by trained cancer registrars before being transmitted to the NCDB in standard format.
In the most recent year for which data were reported, the NCDB included 42% of all estimated U.S. childhood cancers. The cases were reported by institutions that were members of the Pediatric Oncology Group and the Children's Cancer Group as well as nonmember institutions. The distribution of diagnostic groups reported to the NCDB was generally similar to that reported to SEER, except for lymphomas and brain cancer (the NCDB series included benign as well as malignant brain tumors). The distribution of diagnostic groups reported to the NCDB did not change over the 9-year reporting period (1985-1993). With regard to ethnicity, the most varied distribution of diagnostic groups was found among African American patients. For many types of cancer, the survival of those patients reported to the NCDB was similar to that of patients included in the SEER population-based series. These cancers included Wilms' tumor (NCDB 89% vs. SEER 88%), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NCDB 74% vs. SEER 70%), soft tissue sarcomas (NCDB rhabdomyosarcomas 70% and sarcomas 79% vs. SEER soft tissue sarcomas 71%), and neuroblastoma (NCDB 58% vs. SEER 57%).
The authors concluded that the number of brain tumors of benign and uncertain behavior being diagnosed were significant enough in number that they should be included in regional and national cancer registries that report data for clinical purposes. They further concluded that for reasons of data inclusion and institutional coverage, the NCDB will be an important data base for pediatric cancers that will warrant increased use by pediatric investigators.
过去已有多个来源在多机构、地区、国家和国际层面报告了儿童癌症的发病模式及防治进展。这些来源包括临床合作组试验和基于人群的登记处。总体而言,基于人群的调查排除了行为良性或不确定的脑肿瘤。本文作者受评估国家癌症数据库(NCDB)数据的潜力所驱动,对1985 - 1993年期间报告的数据模式进行了调查,该潜力包括:1)便于各机构进行个体审查;2)涵盖不属于儿科肿瘤学组或儿童癌症组这两个国家临床合作组的机构。
从1985年和1988年病例的征集开始,向约2100个设有癌症项目的医院发出了6次年度数据征集通知(1340个项目获得美国外科医师学会癌症委员会批准,760个为其他项目)。NCDB的基线数据项包括患者人口统计学信息、肿瘤特征、初始治疗及随访情况。每个患者的数据由经过培训的癌症登记员以传统方式编码,然后以标准格式传输至NCDB。
在报告数据的最近一年,NCDB涵盖了美国所有估计儿童癌症病例的42%。这些病例由儿科肿瘤学组和儿童癌症组的成员机构以及非成员机构报告。向NCDB报告的诊断组分布与向监测、流行病学与最终结果(SEER)报告的总体相似,但淋巴瘤和脑癌除外(NCDB系列包括良性及恶性脑肿瘤)。在9年报告期(1985 - 1993年)内,向NCDB报告的诊断组分布未发生变化。在种族方面,非裔美国患者的诊断组分布差异最大。对于多种癌症类型,向NCDB报告的患者生存率与SEER基于人群系列中的患者相似。这些癌症包括肾母细胞瘤(NCDB为89%,SEER为88%)、非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NCDB为74%,SEER为70%))、软组织肉瘤(NCDB中横纹肌肉瘤为70%,肉瘤为79%,SEER软组织肉瘤为71%)以及神经母细胞瘤(NCDB为58%),SEER为57%)。
作者得出结论,被诊断出的行为良性和不确定的脑肿瘤数量足够多,应纳入为临床目的报告数据的地区和国家癌症登记处。他们进一步得出结论,出于数据纳入和机构覆盖范围的原因,NCDB将成为儿童癌症的重要数据库,值得儿科研究人员更多地使用。