• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与猪宰前损失相关的风险因素。

Risk factors associated with pig pre-slaughtering losses.

机构信息

Embrapa Suínos e Aves, BR 153, Km 110, 89715-899 Concórdia, SC, Brazil.

Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, UNESP-FCAV, 14884-900 Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Meat Sci. 2019 Sep;155:61-68. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.04.020. Epub 2019 Apr 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.04.020
PMID:31077907
Abstract

The incidence of non-ambulatory non-injured (NANI), non-ambulatory injured (NAI) and dead pigs on-arrival at three Brazilian slaughterhouses were evaluated in 37,962 pigs to identify risk factors linked to them, besides carcass bruises and limb fractures. Total pre-slaughtering losses were 1.18%, in which NAI (0.39%) and NANI (0.37%) incidences contributed the most. A positive relation between on farm steeper ramp slope >20° and the incidence of NAI, NANI and dead pigs at unloading was found. Farm size, pigs/pen, enthalpy at loading, transportation time, truck loading order, muscle thickness and carcass weight, were identified as risk factors for pre-slaughtering losses. Loading procedures influenced the occurrence of limb fractures and bruises (which are a welfare issue and should be reduced). Therefore, personal training on pre-slaughter handling is essential to reduce the risk factors to improve animal welfare and avoid losses during the pre-slaughter process.

摘要

本研究评估了 37962 头猪在抵达巴西 3 家屠宰场时非卧床无损伤(NANI)、非卧床损伤(NAI)和死亡猪的发生率,以确定与它们相关的风险因素,除了胴体瘀伤和四肢骨折外。宰前总损失率为 1.18%,其中 NAI(0.39%)和 NANI(0.37%)的发生率最高。在卸载时,农场斜坡坡度>20°与 NAI、NANI 和死猪的发生率之间存在正相关关系。农场规模、每栏猪数量、装载时的焓值、运输时间、卡车装载顺序、肌肉厚度和胴体重量被确定为宰前损失的风险因素。装载程序影响四肢骨折和瘀伤的发生(这是一个福利问题,应予以减少)。因此,对宰前处理进行人员培训对于减少风险因素、提高动物福利和避免宰前过程中的损失至关重要。

相似文献

1
Risk factors associated with pig pre-slaughtering losses.与猪宰前损失相关的风险因素。
Meat Sci. 2019 Sep;155:61-68. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.04.020. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
2
Effect of distance and daily periods on heat-stressed pigs and pre-slaughter losses in a semiarid region.半干旱地区距离和每日时段对热应激猪和宰前损失的影响。
Int J Biometeorol. 2022 Aug;66(9):1853-1864. doi: 10.1007/s00484-022-02325-y. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
3
Factors associated with fatigued, injured, and dead pig frequency during transport and lairage at a commercial abattoir.在一家商业屠宰场运输和圈养期间与疲劳、受伤和死亡猪只频率相关的因素。
J Anim Sci. 2009 Mar;87(3):1156-66. doi: 10.2527/jas.2008-1270. Epub 2008 Nov 21.
4
Effects of distance moved during loading and floor space on the trailer during transport on losses of market weight pigs on arrival at the packing plant.装载过程中移动的距离以及运输期间拖车的占地面积对生猪抵达屠宰加工厂时市场重量损失的影响。
J Anim Sci. 2007 Dec;85(12):3454-61. doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0232. Epub 2007 Sep 4.
5
Effect of floor space during transport of market-weight pigs on the incidence of transport losses at the packing plant and the relationships between transport conditions and losses.出栏体重猪运输过程中的饲养密度对屠宰场运输损失发生率的影响以及运输条件与损失之间的关系。
J Anim Sci. 2006 Oct;84(10):2856-64. doi: 10.2527/jas.2005-577.
6
Transportation of market-weight pigs: I. effect of season, truck type, and location within truck on behavior with a two-hour transport.市场体重猪的运输:I. 季节、卡车类型和卡车内位置对两小时运输过程中行为的影响。
J Anim Sci. 2013 Jun;91(6):2863-71. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-6005. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
7
2011 and 2012 Early Careers Achievement Awards: farm and pig factors affecting welfare during the marketing process.2011 年和 2012 年早期职业成就奖:农场和猪在销售过程中影响福利的因素。
J Anim Sci. 2013 Jun;91(6):2481-91. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-6114. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
8
On-farm conditions that compromise animal welfare that can be monitored at the slaughter plant.在屠宰场可监测到的、会损害动物福利的农场条件。
Meat Sci. 2017 Oct;132:52-58. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 May 10.
9
The Effect of a Novel Transport System on the Welfare and Meat Quality of Slaughter Pigs.新型运输系统对屠宰猪福利和肉质的影响。
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2021 Jul-Sep;24(3):260-271. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2020.1790370. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
10
Can the monitoring of animal welfare parameters predict pork meat quality variation through the supply chain (from farm to slaughter)?对动物福利参数的监测能否预测猪肉在供应链(从农场到屠宰)中的肉质变化?
J Anim Sci. 2016 Jan;94(1):359-76. doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-9176.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Transportation Time on Weaner Pigs' Welfare and Productive Losses in a Semi-Arid Region.半干旱地区运输时间对断奶仔猪福利及生产损失的影响
Vet Sci. 2025 Mar 1;12(3):214. doi: 10.3390/vetsci12030214.
2
Effects of Stocking Density in the Pen and Lairage Time on Blood Stress Indicators, Skin Lesion Scores, and Pork Meat Quality.栏舍饲养密度和育肥时间对血液应激指标、皮肤损伤评分及猪肉品质的影响
Animals (Basel). 2025 Feb 21;15(5):634. doi: 10.3390/ani15050634.
3
Effect of loading density and weather conditions on animal welfare and meat quality of slaughter pigs.
装载密度和天气条件对屠宰猪的动物福利和肉质的影响。
J Anim Sci Technol. 2023 Nov;65(6):1323-1340. doi: 10.5187/jast.2023.e34. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
4
Animal Welfare Assessment and Meat Quality through Assessment of Stress Biomarkers in Fattening Pigs with and without Visible Damage during Slaughter.通过评估育肥猪屠宰时有无可见损伤情况下的应激生物标志物进行动物福利评估和肉质评估
Animals (Basel). 2024 Feb 23;14(5):700. doi: 10.3390/ani14050700.
5
Evaluation of environmental enrichment on thermophysical responses, carcass traits, and meat quality of finishing pigs.评价环境富集对育肥猪的温热反应、胴体特征和肉质的影响。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2023 Jun 10;55(4):235. doi: 10.1007/s11250-023-03634-z.
6
Road Transport: A Review of Its Effects on the Welfare of Piglets.公路运输:对仔猪福利影响的综述
Animals (Basel). 2023 May 11;13(10):1604. doi: 10.3390/ani13101604.
7
Associations between Pleurisy and the Main Bacterial Pathogens of the Porcine Respiratory Diseases Complex (PRDC).胸膜炎与猪呼吸道疾病综合征(PRDC)主要细菌病原体之间的关联。
Animals (Basel). 2023 Apr 27;13(9):1493. doi: 10.3390/ani13091493.
8
Welfare of pigs during transport.猪在运输过程中的福利。
EFSA J. 2022 Sep 7;20(9):e07445. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7445. eCollection 2022 Sep.
9
Field Trial of Factors Associated With the Presence of Dead and Non-ambulatory Pigs During Transport Across Three Colombian Slaughterhouses.哥伦比亚三家屠宰场生猪运输过程中与死亡和无法行走生猪存在相关因素的现场试验
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Jan 24;9:790570. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.790570. eCollection 2022.
10
Welfare of pigs at slaughter.屠宰时猪的福利。
EFSA J. 2020 Jun 17;18(6):e06148. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6148. eCollection 2020 Jun.