Post-Graduate Program in Restorative Dentistry (Prosthodontic), Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, São Paulo State University (Unesp/SJC), Brazil; Department of Dental Materials Science, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Universiteit van Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit, Gustav Mahlerlaan #3004, 1081, LA Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, the Netherlands.
Post-Graduate Program in Restorative Dentistry (Prosthodontic), Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, São Paulo State University (Unesp/SJC), Engenheiro Francisco José Longo Avenue, 777, 12245-000, São José Dos Campos/SP, Brazil.
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019 Aug;96:279-284. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 May 3.
The goal of this study was to compare the mechanical response of resin-bonded fixed dental prosthesis (RBFDP) made in zirconia, metal, lithium disilicate and composite resin cemented using resin cements with different elastic modulus. For the finite element analysis, a three-dimensional model of partial right maxilla was used to create a model with edentulous space in the second premolar and the cavity's preparation on the first pre-molar and first molar to receive a RBFDP. The model was imported to the analysis software in which they were divided into mesh composed by nodes (371,101) and tetrahedral elements (213,673). Each material was considered isotropic, elastic and homogeneous. No-separation contacts were considered between restoration/resin cement and resin cement/tooth. For all other structures the contacts were considered ideal. The model fixation occurred at the base of the bone and an axial load of 300 N was applied on the pontic occlusal surface. To simulate polymerization shrinkage effects on the cement, the thermal expansion approach was used. The displacement and maximum principal stress (in MPa) were selected as failure criteria. The prosthesis made in composite resin showed higher displacement, while in zirconia showed higher stress concentration. Tensile stress between restoration/cement, cement and cement/cavity was directly proportional to the restorative material's elastic modulus. The more rigid cement increases the tensile zones in the cement layer but decreases the stress between prosthesis and cement. The molar cavity showed higher stress concentration between restoration/cement than the preparation in the pre-molar tooth. The use of composite resin for the manufacturing of RBFDP increases the displacement of the set during the loading. However, it reduces the amount of stress concentration at the adhesive interface in comparison with the other materials.
本研究旨在比较不同弹性模量树脂水门汀粘结的氧化锆、金属、锂硅二酸盐和复合树脂基底全瓷固定修复体的力学响应。为进行有限元分析,使用三维上颌右侧模型,在第二前磨牙处形成无牙区,在第一前磨牙和第一磨牙处制备窝洞,以修复上颌右侧。将模型导入分析软件,将其划分为由节点(371,101)和四面体元素(213,673)组成的网格。所有材料均被视为各向同性、弹性和均匀的。修复体/树脂水门汀和树脂水门汀/牙体之间被认为存在无分离接触。对于所有其他结构,接触被认为是理想的。模型固定在牙槽骨底部,并在桥体咬合面施加 300N 的轴向载荷。为模拟聚合收缩对水门汀的影响,采用热膨胀法。选择位移和最大主应力(MPa)作为失效标准。复合树脂基底的修复体位移较大,而氧化锆基底的修复体则表现出更高的应力集中。修复体/水门汀、水门汀/牙体和水门汀/窝洞之间的拉伸应力与修复材料的弹性模量成正比。更刚性的水门汀会增加水门汀层中的拉伸区,但会降低修复体和水门汀之间的应力。与前磨牙预备体相比,磨牙窝洞处修复体/水门汀之间的应力集中更高。复合树脂基底全瓷固定修复体的使用会增加加载过程中的设定位移。然而,与其他材料相比,它会减少粘结界面的应力集中量。